Cargando…

Postoperative IOP prophylaxis practice following uncomplicated cataract surgery: a UK-wide consultant survey

BACKGROUND: In order to minimise postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) rise, after routine uncomplicated cataract surgery, prophylaxis may be adopted. Currently, there are no specific guidelines in this regard resulting in wide variation in practice across the UK. We sought to document these vari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zamvar, Usha, Dhillon, Baljean
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1260022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16212667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-5-24
_version_ 1782125858280964096
author Zamvar, Usha
Dhillon, Baljean
author_facet Zamvar, Usha
Dhillon, Baljean
author_sort Zamvar, Usha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to minimise postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) rise, after routine uncomplicated cataract surgery, prophylaxis may be adopted. Currently, there are no specific guidelines in this regard resulting in wide variation in practice across the UK. We sought to document these variations through a questionnaire survey. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all consultant ophthalmic surgeons in the UK. RESULTS: 62.6% of surgeons did not use any IOP lowering agents. 37.4% surgeons routinely prescribed some form of medication. The majority (86.8%) used oral diamox. 20.6% of surgeons said they based their practice on evidence, 43.3% on personal experience, and 17.6% on unit policy. Surprisingly, among the two groups of surgeons (those who gave routine prophylaxis, and those who did not) the percentages of surgeons quoting personal experience, unit policy, or presence of evidence was strikingly similar. The timing of the first postoperative IOP check varied from the same day to beyond 2 weeks. Only 20.2% of surgeons had ever seen an adverse event related to IOP rise; this complication is thus very rare. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights a wide variation in the practice and postoperative management of phacoemulsification cataract surgery. What is very striking is that there is a similar proportion of surgeons in the diametrically opposite groups (those who give or do not give routine IOP lowering prophylaxis) who believe that there practice is evidence based. The merits of this study suggests that consideration must be given to drafting a uniform guideline in this area of practice.
format Text
id pubmed-1260022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12600222005-10-21 Postoperative IOP prophylaxis practice following uncomplicated cataract surgery: a UK-wide consultant survey Zamvar, Usha Dhillon, Baljean BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: In order to minimise postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) rise, after routine uncomplicated cataract surgery, prophylaxis may be adopted. Currently, there are no specific guidelines in this regard resulting in wide variation in practice across the UK. We sought to document these variations through a questionnaire survey. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all consultant ophthalmic surgeons in the UK. RESULTS: 62.6% of surgeons did not use any IOP lowering agents. 37.4% surgeons routinely prescribed some form of medication. The majority (86.8%) used oral diamox. 20.6% of surgeons said they based their practice on evidence, 43.3% on personal experience, and 17.6% on unit policy. Surprisingly, among the two groups of surgeons (those who gave routine prophylaxis, and those who did not) the percentages of surgeons quoting personal experience, unit policy, or presence of evidence was strikingly similar. The timing of the first postoperative IOP check varied from the same day to beyond 2 weeks. Only 20.2% of surgeons had ever seen an adverse event related to IOP rise; this complication is thus very rare. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights a wide variation in the practice and postoperative management of phacoemulsification cataract surgery. What is very striking is that there is a similar proportion of surgeons in the diametrically opposite groups (those who give or do not give routine IOP lowering prophylaxis) who believe that there practice is evidence based. The merits of this study suggests that consideration must be given to drafting a uniform guideline in this area of practice. BioMed Central 2005-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1260022/ /pubmed/16212667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-5-24 Text en Copyright © 2005 Zamvar and Dhillon; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zamvar, Usha
Dhillon, Baljean
Postoperative IOP prophylaxis practice following uncomplicated cataract surgery: a UK-wide consultant survey
title Postoperative IOP prophylaxis practice following uncomplicated cataract surgery: a UK-wide consultant survey
title_full Postoperative IOP prophylaxis practice following uncomplicated cataract surgery: a UK-wide consultant survey
title_fullStr Postoperative IOP prophylaxis practice following uncomplicated cataract surgery: a UK-wide consultant survey
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative IOP prophylaxis practice following uncomplicated cataract surgery: a UK-wide consultant survey
title_short Postoperative IOP prophylaxis practice following uncomplicated cataract surgery: a UK-wide consultant survey
title_sort postoperative iop prophylaxis practice following uncomplicated cataract surgery: a uk-wide consultant survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1260022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16212667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-5-24
work_keys_str_mv AT zamvarusha postoperativeiopprophylaxispracticefollowinguncomplicatedcataractsurgeryaukwideconsultantsurvey
AT dhillonbaljean postoperativeiopprophylaxispracticefollowinguncomplicatedcataractsurgeryaukwideconsultantsurvey