Cargando…

Effects of type and level of training on variation in physician knowledge in the use and acquisition of blood cultures: a cross sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Blood culture (BCX) use is often sub-optimal, and is a user-dependent diagnostic test. Little is known about physician training and BCX-related knowledge. We sought to assess variations in caregiver BCX-related knowledge, and their relation to medical training. METHODS: We developed and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parada, Jorge P, Schwartz, David N, Schiff, Gordon D, Weiss, Kevin B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1261264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16164757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-71
_version_ 1782125869824737280
author Parada, Jorge P
Schwartz, David N
Schiff, Gordon D
Weiss, Kevin B
author_facet Parada, Jorge P
Schwartz, David N
Schiff, Gordon D
Weiss, Kevin B
author_sort Parada, Jorge P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood culture (BCX) use is often sub-optimal, and is a user-dependent diagnostic test. Little is known about physician training and BCX-related knowledge. We sought to assess variations in caregiver BCX-related knowledge, and their relation to medical training. METHODS: We developed and piloted a self-administered BCX-related knowledge survey instrument. Expert opinion, literature review, focus groups, and mini-pilots reduced > 100 questions in multiple formats to a final questionnaire with 15 scored content items and 4 covariate identifiers. This questionnaire was used in a cross-sectional survey of physicians, fellows, residents and medical students at a large urban public teaching hospital. The responses were stratified by years/level of training, type of specialty training, self-reported practical and theoretical BCX-related instruction. Summary scores were derived from participant responses compared to a 95% consensus opinion of infectious diseases specialists that matched an evidence based reference standard. RESULTS: There were 291 respondents (Attendings = 72, Post-Graduate Year (PGY) = 3 = 84, PGY2 = 42, PGY1 = 41, medical students = 52). Mean scores differed by training level (Attending = 85.0, PGY3 = 81.1, PGY2 = 78.4, PGY1 = 75.4, students = 67.7) [p ≤ 0.001], and training type (Infectious Diseases = 96.1, Medicine = 81.7, Emergency Medicine = 79.6, Surgery = 78.5, Family Practice = 76.5, Obstetrics-Gynecology = 74.4, Pediatrics = 74.0) [p ≤ 0.001]. Higher summary scores were associated with self-reported theoretical [p ≤ 0.001] and practical [p = 0.001] BCX-related training. Linear regression showed level and type of training accounted for most of the score variation. CONCLUSION: Higher mean scores were associated with advancing level of training and greater subject-related training. Notably, house staff and medical students, who are most likely to order and/or obtain BCXs, lack key BCX-related knowledge. Targeted education may improve utilization of this important diagnostic tool.
format Text
id pubmed-1261264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12612642005-10-22 Effects of type and level of training on variation in physician knowledge in the use and acquisition of blood cultures: a cross sectional survey Parada, Jorge P Schwartz, David N Schiff, Gordon D Weiss, Kevin B BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Blood culture (BCX) use is often sub-optimal, and is a user-dependent diagnostic test. Little is known about physician training and BCX-related knowledge. We sought to assess variations in caregiver BCX-related knowledge, and their relation to medical training. METHODS: We developed and piloted a self-administered BCX-related knowledge survey instrument. Expert opinion, literature review, focus groups, and mini-pilots reduced > 100 questions in multiple formats to a final questionnaire with 15 scored content items and 4 covariate identifiers. This questionnaire was used in a cross-sectional survey of physicians, fellows, residents and medical students at a large urban public teaching hospital. The responses were stratified by years/level of training, type of specialty training, self-reported practical and theoretical BCX-related instruction. Summary scores were derived from participant responses compared to a 95% consensus opinion of infectious diseases specialists that matched an evidence based reference standard. RESULTS: There were 291 respondents (Attendings = 72, Post-Graduate Year (PGY) = 3 = 84, PGY2 = 42, PGY1 = 41, medical students = 52). Mean scores differed by training level (Attending = 85.0, PGY3 = 81.1, PGY2 = 78.4, PGY1 = 75.4, students = 67.7) [p ≤ 0.001], and training type (Infectious Diseases = 96.1, Medicine = 81.7, Emergency Medicine = 79.6, Surgery = 78.5, Family Practice = 76.5, Obstetrics-Gynecology = 74.4, Pediatrics = 74.0) [p ≤ 0.001]. Higher summary scores were associated with self-reported theoretical [p ≤ 0.001] and practical [p = 0.001] BCX-related training. Linear regression showed level and type of training accounted for most of the score variation. CONCLUSION: Higher mean scores were associated with advancing level of training and greater subject-related training. Notably, house staff and medical students, who are most likely to order and/or obtain BCXs, lack key BCX-related knowledge. Targeted education may improve utilization of this important diagnostic tool. BioMed Central 2005-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1261264/ /pubmed/16164757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-71 Text en Copyright © 2005 Parada et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parada, Jorge P
Schwartz, David N
Schiff, Gordon D
Weiss, Kevin B
Effects of type and level of training on variation in physician knowledge in the use and acquisition of blood cultures: a cross sectional survey
title Effects of type and level of training on variation in physician knowledge in the use and acquisition of blood cultures: a cross sectional survey
title_full Effects of type and level of training on variation in physician knowledge in the use and acquisition of blood cultures: a cross sectional survey
title_fullStr Effects of type and level of training on variation in physician knowledge in the use and acquisition of blood cultures: a cross sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Effects of type and level of training on variation in physician knowledge in the use and acquisition of blood cultures: a cross sectional survey
title_short Effects of type and level of training on variation in physician knowledge in the use and acquisition of blood cultures: a cross sectional survey
title_sort effects of type and level of training on variation in physician knowledge in the use and acquisition of blood cultures: a cross sectional survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1261264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16164757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-71
work_keys_str_mv AT paradajorgep effectsoftypeandleveloftrainingonvariationinphysicianknowledgeintheuseandacquisitionofbloodculturesacrosssectionalsurvey
AT schwartzdavidn effectsoftypeandleveloftrainingonvariationinphysicianknowledgeintheuseandacquisitionofbloodculturesacrosssectionalsurvey
AT schiffgordond effectsoftypeandleveloftrainingonvariationinphysicianknowledgeintheuseandacquisitionofbloodculturesacrosssectionalsurvey
AT weisskevinb effectsoftypeandleveloftrainingonvariationinphysicianknowledgeintheuseandacquisitionofbloodculturesacrosssectionalsurvey