Cargando…

Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have indicated that the human genome could be divided into regions with low haplotype diversity interspersed with regions of high haplotype diversity. In regions of low haplotype diversity, a small fraction of SNPs (tag SNPs) are sufficient to account for most of the haplo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Kui, Sun, Fengzhu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1274312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16236175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-51
_version_ 1782125989213503488
author Zhang, Kui
Sun, Fengzhu
author_facet Zhang, Kui
Sun, Fengzhu
author_sort Zhang, Kui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies have indicated that the human genome could be divided into regions with low haplotype diversity interspersed with regions of high haplotype diversity. In regions of low haplotype diversity, a small fraction of SNPs (tag SNPs) are sufficient to account for most of the haplotype diversity of the human genome. These tag SNPs can be extremely useful for testing the association of a marker locus with a qualitative or quantitative trait locus in that it may not be necessary to genotype all the SNPs. When tag SNPs are used to reduce the genotyping effort in association studies, it is important to know how much power is lost. It is also important to know how much power is gained when tag SNPs instead of the same number of randomly chosen SNPs are used. RESULTS: We design a simulation study to tackle these problems for a variety of quantitative association tests using either case-parent samples or unrelated population samples. First, the samples are generated based on the quantitative trait model with the assumption of either an extremal sampling scheme or a random sampling scheme. Second, a small number of samples are selected to determine the haplotype blocks and the tag SNPs. Third, the statistical power of the tests is evaluated using four kinds of data: (1) all the SNPs and the corresponding haplotypes, (2) the tag SNPs and the corresponding haplotypes, (3) the same number of evenly spaced SNPs with minor allele frequency greater than a threshold and the corresponding haplotypes, (4) the same number of randomly chosen SNPs and their corresponding haplotypes. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in most situations genotyping efforts can be significantly reduced by using tag SNPs for mapping the QTL in association studies without much loss of power, which is consistent with previous studies on association mapping of qualitative traits. For all situations considered, two-locus haplotype analysis using tag SNPs are more powerful than those using the same number of randomly selected SNPs, but the degree of such power differences depends upon the sampling scheme and the population history.
format Text
id pubmed-1274312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12743122005-10-29 Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples Zhang, Kui Sun, Fengzhu BMC Genet Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent studies have indicated that the human genome could be divided into regions with low haplotype diversity interspersed with regions of high haplotype diversity. In regions of low haplotype diversity, a small fraction of SNPs (tag SNPs) are sufficient to account for most of the haplotype diversity of the human genome. These tag SNPs can be extremely useful for testing the association of a marker locus with a qualitative or quantitative trait locus in that it may not be necessary to genotype all the SNPs. When tag SNPs are used to reduce the genotyping effort in association studies, it is important to know how much power is lost. It is also important to know how much power is gained when tag SNPs instead of the same number of randomly chosen SNPs are used. RESULTS: We design a simulation study to tackle these problems for a variety of quantitative association tests using either case-parent samples or unrelated population samples. First, the samples are generated based on the quantitative trait model with the assumption of either an extremal sampling scheme or a random sampling scheme. Second, a small number of samples are selected to determine the haplotype blocks and the tag SNPs. Third, the statistical power of the tests is evaluated using four kinds of data: (1) all the SNPs and the corresponding haplotypes, (2) the tag SNPs and the corresponding haplotypes, (3) the same number of evenly spaced SNPs with minor allele frequency greater than a threshold and the corresponding haplotypes, (4) the same number of randomly chosen SNPs and their corresponding haplotypes. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in most situations genotyping efforts can be significantly reduced by using tag SNPs for mapping the QTL in association studies without much loss of power, which is consistent with previous studies on association mapping of qualitative traits. For all situations considered, two-locus haplotype analysis using tag SNPs are more powerful than those using the same number of randomly selected SNPs, but the degree of such power differences depends upon the sampling scheme and the population history. BioMed Central 2005-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1274312/ /pubmed/16236175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-51 Text en Copyright © 2005 Zhang and Sun; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Kui
Sun, Fengzhu
Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples
title Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples
title_full Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples
title_fullStr Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples
title_short Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples
title_sort assessing the power of tag snps in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (qtl) with extremal and random samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1274312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16236175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-51
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangkui assessingthepoweroftagsnpsinthemappingofquantitativetraitlociqtlwithextremalandrandomsamples
AT sunfengzhu assessingthepoweroftagsnpsinthemappingofquantitativetraitlociqtlwithextremalandrandomsamples