Cargando…
Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
BACKGROUND: Cochrane systematic reviews aim to provide readers with the most up-to-date evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions. The policy of updating Cochrane reviews every two years consumes valuable time and resources and may not be appropriate for all reviews. The objective of this...
Autores principales: | French, Simon D, McDonald, Steve, McKenzie, Joanne E, Green, Sally E |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1274326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16225692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-33 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews
por: Piehl, Janet H, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews
por: Mimouni, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
por: Zhu, Linlin, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
por: Tomlinson, Eve, et al.
Publicado: (2023)