Cargando…

Reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators

BACKGROUND: A pivotal component in automated external defibrillators (AEDs) is the detection of ventricular fibrillation by means of appropriate detection algorithms. In scientific literature there exists a wide variety of methods and ideas for handling this task. These algorithms should have a high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amann, Anton, Tratnig, Robert, Unterkofler, Karl
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1283146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16253134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-4-60
_version_ 1782126141992075264
author Amann, Anton
Tratnig, Robert
Unterkofler, Karl
author_facet Amann, Anton
Tratnig, Robert
Unterkofler, Karl
author_sort Amann, Anton
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A pivotal component in automated external defibrillators (AEDs) is the detection of ventricular fibrillation by means of appropriate detection algorithms. In scientific literature there exists a wide variety of methods and ideas for handling this task. These algorithms should have a high detection quality, be easily implementable, and work in real time in an AED. Testing of these algorithms should be done by using a large amount of annotated data under equal conditions. METHODS: For our investigation we simulated a continuous analysis by selecting the data in steps of one second without any preselection. We used the complete BIH-MIT arrhythmia database, the CU database, and the files 7001 – 8210 of the AHA database. All algorithms were tested under equal conditions. RESULTS: For 5 well-known standard and 5 new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and the area under their receiver operating characteristic. In addition, two QRS detection algorithms were included. These results are based on approximately 330 000 decisions (per algorithm). CONCLUSION: Our values for sensitivity and specificity differ from earlier investigations since we used no preselection. The best algorithm is a new one, presented here for the first time.
format Text
id pubmed-1283146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12831462005-11-15 Reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators Amann, Anton Tratnig, Robert Unterkofler, Karl Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: A pivotal component in automated external defibrillators (AEDs) is the detection of ventricular fibrillation by means of appropriate detection algorithms. In scientific literature there exists a wide variety of methods and ideas for handling this task. These algorithms should have a high detection quality, be easily implementable, and work in real time in an AED. Testing of these algorithms should be done by using a large amount of annotated data under equal conditions. METHODS: For our investigation we simulated a continuous analysis by selecting the data in steps of one second without any preselection. We used the complete BIH-MIT arrhythmia database, the CU database, and the files 7001 – 8210 of the AHA database. All algorithms were tested under equal conditions. RESULTS: For 5 well-known standard and 5 new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and the area under their receiver operating characteristic. In addition, two QRS detection algorithms were included. These results are based on approximately 330 000 decisions (per algorithm). CONCLUSION: Our values for sensitivity and specificity differ from earlier investigations since we used no preselection. The best algorithm is a new one, presented here for the first time. BioMed Central 2005-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1283146/ /pubmed/16253134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-4-60 Text en Copyright © 2005 Amann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Amann, Anton
Tratnig, Robert
Unterkofler, Karl
Reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators
title Reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators
title_full Reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators
title_fullStr Reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators
title_short Reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators
title_sort reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1283146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16253134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-4-60
work_keys_str_mv AT amannanton reliabilityofoldandnewventricularfibrillationdetectionalgorithmsforautomatedexternaldefibrillators
AT tratnigrobert reliabilityofoldandnewventricularfibrillationdetectionalgorithmsforautomatedexternaldefibrillators
AT unterkoflerkarl reliabilityofoldandnewventricularfibrillationdetectionalgorithmsforautomatedexternaldefibrillators