Cargando…

Testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in ADHD: Reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample

BACKGROUND: Advances in both genetic and cognitive-experimental studies on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have opened new opportunities for cognitive endophenotype research. In such genetic designs the focus is on individual differences in characteristics, associated with ADHD, that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuntsi, Jonna, Andreou, Penny, Ma, Jonathan, Börger, Norbert A, van der Meere, Jaap J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1291376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16262903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-5-40
_version_ 1782126194324406272
author Kuntsi, Jonna
Andreou, Penny
Ma, Jonathan
Börger, Norbert A
van der Meere, Jaap J
author_facet Kuntsi, Jonna
Andreou, Penny
Ma, Jonathan
Börger, Norbert A
van der Meere, Jaap J
author_sort Kuntsi, Jonna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advances in both genetic and cognitive-experimental studies on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have opened new opportunities for cognitive endophenotype research. In such genetic designs the focus is on individual differences in characteristics, associated with ADHD, that can be measured reliably over time. Genetic studies that take a 'quantitative trait loci' approach hypothesise that multiple susceptibility genes contribute to a continuous dimension of ADHD symptoms. As an important initial step, we aimed to investigate the underlying assumptions that (1) key cognitive-experimental tasks indicate adequate test-retest reliability and (2) ADHD symptom scores in a general population sample are associated with performance on these tasks. METHODS: Forty-nine children were assessed on a go/no-go task and a reaction time task (the 'fast task') that included manipulations with event rate and incentives. The children were assessed twice, with a test-retest interval of two weeks. RESULTS: The majority of the task variables demonstrated moderate-to-good test-retest reliability. The correlations between teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms and key task variables were .4–.6: ADHD symptoms were associated with poor performance (especially high reaction time variability) in a slow baseline condition, whereas there was low or no association in conditions with a faster event rate or incentives. In contrast, no clear pattern of findings emerged based on parent ratings of ADHD symptoms. CONCLUSION: The data support the usefulness of the go/no-go and fast tasks for genetic studies, which require reliable and valid indices of individual differences. The overall pattern of associations between teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms and task variables is consistent with effects of event rate and incentives on performance, as predicted by the model of activation and arousal regulation. The lack of a clear pattern of findings with parent ratings of ADHD symptoms warrants further study.
format Text
id pubmed-1291376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12913762005-11-26 Testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in ADHD: Reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample Kuntsi, Jonna Andreou, Penny Ma, Jonathan Börger, Norbert A van der Meere, Jaap J BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Advances in both genetic and cognitive-experimental studies on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have opened new opportunities for cognitive endophenotype research. In such genetic designs the focus is on individual differences in characteristics, associated with ADHD, that can be measured reliably over time. Genetic studies that take a 'quantitative trait loci' approach hypothesise that multiple susceptibility genes contribute to a continuous dimension of ADHD symptoms. As an important initial step, we aimed to investigate the underlying assumptions that (1) key cognitive-experimental tasks indicate adequate test-retest reliability and (2) ADHD symptom scores in a general population sample are associated with performance on these tasks. METHODS: Forty-nine children were assessed on a go/no-go task and a reaction time task (the 'fast task') that included manipulations with event rate and incentives. The children were assessed twice, with a test-retest interval of two weeks. RESULTS: The majority of the task variables demonstrated moderate-to-good test-retest reliability. The correlations between teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms and key task variables were .4–.6: ADHD symptoms were associated with poor performance (especially high reaction time variability) in a slow baseline condition, whereas there was low or no association in conditions with a faster event rate or incentives. In contrast, no clear pattern of findings emerged based on parent ratings of ADHD symptoms. CONCLUSION: The data support the usefulness of the go/no-go and fast tasks for genetic studies, which require reliable and valid indices of individual differences. The overall pattern of associations between teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms and task variables is consistent with effects of event rate and incentives on performance, as predicted by the model of activation and arousal regulation. The lack of a clear pattern of findings with parent ratings of ADHD symptoms warrants further study. BioMed Central 2005-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1291376/ /pubmed/16262903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-5-40 Text en Copyright © 2005 Kuntsi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kuntsi, Jonna
Andreou, Penny
Ma, Jonathan
Börger, Norbert A
van der Meere, Jaap J
Testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in ADHD: Reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample
title Testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in ADHD: Reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample
title_full Testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in ADHD: Reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample
title_fullStr Testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in ADHD: Reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample
title_full_unstemmed Testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in ADHD: Reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample
title_short Testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in ADHD: Reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample
title_sort testing assumptions for endophenotype studies in adhd: reliability and validity of tasks in a general population sample
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1291376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16262903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-5-40
work_keys_str_mv AT kuntsijonna testingassumptionsforendophenotypestudiesinadhdreliabilityandvalidityoftasksinageneralpopulationsample
AT andreoupenny testingassumptionsforendophenotypestudiesinadhdreliabilityandvalidityoftasksinageneralpopulationsample
AT majonathan testingassumptionsforendophenotypestudiesinadhdreliabilityandvalidityoftasksinageneralpopulationsample
AT borgernorberta testingassumptionsforendophenotypestudiesinadhdreliabilityandvalidityoftasksinageneralpopulationsample
AT vandermeerejaapj testingassumptionsforendophenotypestudiesinadhdreliabilityandvalidityoftasksinageneralpopulationsample