Cargando…
Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study
BACKGROUND: Undenutrition is known to be prevalent and largely unrecognised in older patients; however, aberrations in indicators of nutritional status may simply reflect effects of age and/or functional disability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the effect, if any of age on nutriti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1291398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16253135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-4-28 |
_version_ | 1782126199911219200 |
---|---|
author | Forster, Sarah Gariballa, Salah |
author_facet | Forster, Sarah Gariballa, Salah |
author_sort | Forster, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Undenutrition is known to be prevalent and largely unrecognised in older patients; however, aberrations in indicators of nutritional status may simply reflect effects of age and/or functional disability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the effect, if any of age on nutritional status in older patients. DESIGN: 445 randomly selected hospitalised patients consented to nutritional status assessment derived from anthropometric, haematological, and biochemical data within 72 hours of admission. Nutritional status was compared between those age < 75 years and those aged 75 years or more. Using multiple regression models, we measured the association between age and nutritional assessment variables after adjusting for disability, chronic illness, medications, smoking and tissue inflammation. RESULTS: Body weight, body mass index, mid-upper arm circumference, haemoglobin, serum albumin and plasma ascorbic acid were all significantly lower in people aged ≥ 75 years compared with those < 75 years of age. Although riboflavin (vitamin B2), 25OH VitD(3), red-cell folate and vitamin B(12 )concentrations were lower in those aged ≥ 75 years, differences were not statistically significant. After adjusting for disability and co-morbidity in a multivariate analysis, age alone had a significant and independent effect on important anthropometric and biochemical nutritional assessment variables. CONCLUSION: Increasing age is independently associated with poor nutritional status. This may partly explain the poor clinical outcome in older patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1291398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-12913982005-11-26 Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study Forster, Sarah Gariballa, Salah Nutr J Research BACKGROUND: Undenutrition is known to be prevalent and largely unrecognised in older patients; however, aberrations in indicators of nutritional status may simply reflect effects of age and/or functional disability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the effect, if any of age on nutritional status in older patients. DESIGN: 445 randomly selected hospitalised patients consented to nutritional status assessment derived from anthropometric, haematological, and biochemical data within 72 hours of admission. Nutritional status was compared between those age < 75 years and those aged 75 years or more. Using multiple regression models, we measured the association between age and nutritional assessment variables after adjusting for disability, chronic illness, medications, smoking and tissue inflammation. RESULTS: Body weight, body mass index, mid-upper arm circumference, haemoglobin, serum albumin and plasma ascorbic acid were all significantly lower in people aged ≥ 75 years compared with those < 75 years of age. Although riboflavin (vitamin B2), 25OH VitD(3), red-cell folate and vitamin B(12 )concentrations were lower in those aged ≥ 75 years, differences were not statistically significant. After adjusting for disability and co-morbidity in a multivariate analysis, age alone had a significant and independent effect on important anthropometric and biochemical nutritional assessment variables. CONCLUSION: Increasing age is independently associated with poor nutritional status. This may partly explain the poor clinical outcome in older patients. BioMed Central 2005-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1291398/ /pubmed/16253135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-4-28 Text en Copyright © 2005 Forster and Gariballa; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Forster, Sarah Gariballa, Salah Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study |
title | Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study |
title_full | Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study |
title_fullStr | Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study |
title_short | Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study |
title_sort | age as a determinant of nutritional status: a cross sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1291398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16253135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-4-28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forstersarah ageasadeterminantofnutritionalstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT gariballasalah ageasadeterminantofnutritionalstatusacrosssectionalstudy |