Cargando…

Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: Undenutrition is known to be prevalent and largely unrecognised in older patients; however, aberrations in indicators of nutritional status may simply reflect effects of age and/or functional disability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the effect, if any of age on nutriti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forster, Sarah, Gariballa, Salah
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1291398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16253135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-4-28
_version_ 1782126199911219200
author Forster, Sarah
Gariballa, Salah
author_facet Forster, Sarah
Gariballa, Salah
author_sort Forster, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Undenutrition is known to be prevalent and largely unrecognised in older patients; however, aberrations in indicators of nutritional status may simply reflect effects of age and/or functional disability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the effect, if any of age on nutritional status in older patients. DESIGN: 445 randomly selected hospitalised patients consented to nutritional status assessment derived from anthropometric, haematological, and biochemical data within 72 hours of admission. Nutritional status was compared between those age < 75 years and those aged 75 years or more. Using multiple regression models, we measured the association between age and nutritional assessment variables after adjusting for disability, chronic illness, medications, smoking and tissue inflammation. RESULTS: Body weight, body mass index, mid-upper arm circumference, haemoglobin, serum albumin and plasma ascorbic acid were all significantly lower in people aged ≥ 75 years compared with those < 75 years of age. Although riboflavin (vitamin B2), 25OH VitD(3), red-cell folate and vitamin B(12 )concentrations were lower in those aged ≥ 75 years, differences were not statistically significant. After adjusting for disability and co-morbidity in a multivariate analysis, age alone had a significant and independent effect on important anthropometric and biochemical nutritional assessment variables. CONCLUSION: Increasing age is independently associated with poor nutritional status. This may partly explain the poor clinical outcome in older patients.
format Text
id pubmed-1291398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12913982005-11-26 Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study Forster, Sarah Gariballa, Salah Nutr J Research BACKGROUND: Undenutrition is known to be prevalent and largely unrecognised in older patients; however, aberrations in indicators of nutritional status may simply reflect effects of age and/or functional disability. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the effect, if any of age on nutritional status in older patients. DESIGN: 445 randomly selected hospitalised patients consented to nutritional status assessment derived from anthropometric, haematological, and biochemical data within 72 hours of admission. Nutritional status was compared between those age < 75 years and those aged 75 years or more. Using multiple regression models, we measured the association between age and nutritional assessment variables after adjusting for disability, chronic illness, medications, smoking and tissue inflammation. RESULTS: Body weight, body mass index, mid-upper arm circumference, haemoglobin, serum albumin and plasma ascorbic acid were all significantly lower in people aged ≥ 75 years compared with those < 75 years of age. Although riboflavin (vitamin B2), 25OH VitD(3), red-cell folate and vitamin B(12 )concentrations were lower in those aged ≥ 75 years, differences were not statistically significant. After adjusting for disability and co-morbidity in a multivariate analysis, age alone had a significant and independent effect on important anthropometric and biochemical nutritional assessment variables. CONCLUSION: Increasing age is independently associated with poor nutritional status. This may partly explain the poor clinical outcome in older patients. BioMed Central 2005-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1291398/ /pubmed/16253135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-4-28 Text en Copyright © 2005 Forster and Gariballa; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Forster, Sarah
Gariballa, Salah
Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study
title Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study
title_full Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study
title_fullStr Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study
title_short Age as a determinant of nutritional status: A cross sectional study
title_sort age as a determinant of nutritional status: a cross sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1291398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16253135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-4-28
work_keys_str_mv AT forstersarah ageasadeterminantofnutritionalstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT gariballasalah ageasadeterminantofnutritionalstatusacrosssectionalstudy