Cargando…

Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey

BACKGROUND: In the backdrop of conflicting reports (some studies reported adverse outcomes of biomass fuel use whereas few studies reported absence of any association between adverse health effect and fuel use, may be due to presence of large number of confounding variables) on the respiratory healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Asim, Mohan Rao, N, Kulkarni, PK, Majumdar, PK, Saiyed, HN
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1291405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16255784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-127
_version_ 1782126201674924032
author Saha, Asim
Mohan Rao, N
Kulkarni, PK
Majumdar, PK
Saiyed, HN
author_facet Saha, Asim
Mohan Rao, N
Kulkarni, PK
Majumdar, PK
Saiyed, HN
author_sort Saha, Asim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the backdrop of conflicting reports (some studies reported adverse outcomes of biomass fuel use whereas few studies reported absence of any association between adverse health effect and fuel use, may be due to presence of large number of confounding variables) on the respiratory health effects of biomass fuel use, this cross sectional survey was undertaken to understand the role of fuel use on pulmonary function. METHOD: This study was conducted in a village of western India involving 369 randomly selected adult subjects (165 male and 204 female). All the subjects were interviewed and were subjected to pulmonary function test. Analysis of covariance was performed to compare the levels of different pulmonary function test parameters in relation to different fuel use taking care of the role of possible confounding factors. RESULTS: This study showed that biomass fuel use (especially wood) is an important factor for deterioration of pulmonary function (particularly in female). FEV(1 )(p < .05), FEV(1 )% (p < .01), PEFR (p < .05) and FEF(25–75 )(p < .01) values were significantly lower in biomass fuel using females than nonusers. Comparison of only biomass fuel use vs. only LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) use and only wood vs. only LPG use has showed that LPG is a safer fuel so far as deterioration of pulmonary function is concerned. This study observes some deterioration of pulmonary function in the male subjects also, who came from biomass fuel using families. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that traditional biomass fuels like wood have adverse effects on pulmonary function.
format Text
id pubmed-1291405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-12914052005-11-26 Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey Saha, Asim Mohan Rao, N Kulkarni, PK Majumdar, PK Saiyed, HN Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: In the backdrop of conflicting reports (some studies reported adverse outcomes of biomass fuel use whereas few studies reported absence of any association between adverse health effect and fuel use, may be due to presence of large number of confounding variables) on the respiratory health effects of biomass fuel use, this cross sectional survey was undertaken to understand the role of fuel use on pulmonary function. METHOD: This study was conducted in a village of western India involving 369 randomly selected adult subjects (165 male and 204 female). All the subjects were interviewed and were subjected to pulmonary function test. Analysis of covariance was performed to compare the levels of different pulmonary function test parameters in relation to different fuel use taking care of the role of possible confounding factors. RESULTS: This study showed that biomass fuel use (especially wood) is an important factor for deterioration of pulmonary function (particularly in female). FEV(1 )(p < .05), FEV(1 )% (p < .01), PEFR (p < .05) and FEF(25–75 )(p < .01) values were significantly lower in biomass fuel using females than nonusers. Comparison of only biomass fuel use vs. only LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) use and only wood vs. only LPG use has showed that LPG is a safer fuel so far as deterioration of pulmonary function is concerned. This study observes some deterioration of pulmonary function in the male subjects also, who came from biomass fuel using families. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that traditional biomass fuels like wood have adverse effects on pulmonary function. BioMed Central 2005 2005-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1291405/ /pubmed/16255784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-127 Text en Copyright © 2005 Saha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Saha, Asim
Mohan Rao, N
Kulkarni, PK
Majumdar, PK
Saiyed, HN
Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_full Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_fullStr Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_full_unstemmed Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_short Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_sort pulmonary function and fuel use: a population survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1291405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16255784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-127
work_keys_str_mv AT sahaasim pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey
AT mohanraon pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey
AT kulkarnipk pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey
AT majumdarpk pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey
AT saiyedhn pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey