Cargando…

A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries

BACKGROUND: Balloon injury (BI) of the rat carotid artery (CCA) is widely used to study intimal hyperplasia (IH) and decrease in lumen diameter (LD), but CCA's small diameter impedes the evaluation of endovascular therapies. Therefore, we validated BI in the aorta (AA) and iliac artery (CIA) to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabeler, Edward EE, van Hillegersberg, Richard, Statius van Eps, Randolph G, Sluiter, Wim, Gussenhoven, Elma J, Mulder, Paul, van Urk, Hero
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12350231
_version_ 1782120380883795968
author Gabeler, Edward EE
van Hillegersberg, Richard
Statius van Eps, Randolph G
Sluiter, Wim
Gussenhoven, Elma J
Mulder, Paul
van Urk, Hero
author_facet Gabeler, Edward EE
van Hillegersberg, Richard
Statius van Eps, Randolph G
Sluiter, Wim
Gussenhoven, Elma J
Mulder, Paul
van Urk, Hero
author_sort Gabeler, Edward EE
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Balloon injury (BI) of the rat carotid artery (CCA) is widely used to study intimal hyperplasia (IH) and decrease in lumen diameter (LD), but CCA's small diameter impedes the evaluation of endovascular therapies. Therefore, we validated BI in the aorta (AA) and iliac artery (CIA) to compare it with CCA. METHODS: Rats underwent BI or a sham procedure (control). Light microscopic evaluation was performed either directly or at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 16 weeks follow-up. The area of IH and the change in LD (LD at 16 weeks minus LD post BI) were compared. RESULTS: In the BI-groups the area of IH increased to 0.14 ± 0.08 mm(2) (CCA), 0.14 ± 0.03 mm(2) (CIA) and 0.12 ± 0.04 mm(2) (AA) at 16 weeks (NS). The LD decreased with 0.49 ± 0.07 mm (CCA), compared to 0.22 ± 0.07 mm (CIA) and 0.07 ± 0.10 mm (AA) at 16 weeks (p < 0.05). The constrictive vascular remodelling (CVR = wall circumference loss combined with a decrease in LD) was -0.17 ± 0.05 mm in CIA but absent in CCA and AA. No IH, no decrease in LD and no CVR was seen in the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: BI resulted in: (1.) a decrease in LD in CCA due to IH, (2.) a decrease in LD in CIA due to IH and CVR, (3.) no change in LD in AA, (4.) Comparable IH development in all arteries, (5.) CCA has no vasa vasorum compared to CIA and AA, (6.) The CIA model combines good access for 2 F endovascular catheters with a decrease in LD due to IH and CVR after BI.
format Text
id pubmed-130046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1300462002-10-25 A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries Gabeler, Edward EE van Hillegersberg, Richard Statius van Eps, Randolph G Sluiter, Wim Gussenhoven, Elma J Mulder, Paul van Urk, Hero BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Balloon injury (BI) of the rat carotid artery (CCA) is widely used to study intimal hyperplasia (IH) and decrease in lumen diameter (LD), but CCA's small diameter impedes the evaluation of endovascular therapies. Therefore, we validated BI in the aorta (AA) and iliac artery (CIA) to compare it with CCA. METHODS: Rats underwent BI or a sham procedure (control). Light microscopic evaluation was performed either directly or at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 16 weeks follow-up. The area of IH and the change in LD (LD at 16 weeks minus LD post BI) were compared. RESULTS: In the BI-groups the area of IH increased to 0.14 ± 0.08 mm(2) (CCA), 0.14 ± 0.03 mm(2) (CIA) and 0.12 ± 0.04 mm(2) (AA) at 16 weeks (NS). The LD decreased with 0.49 ± 0.07 mm (CCA), compared to 0.22 ± 0.07 mm (CIA) and 0.07 ± 0.10 mm (AA) at 16 weeks (p < 0.05). The constrictive vascular remodelling (CVR = wall circumference loss combined with a decrease in LD) was -0.17 ± 0.05 mm in CIA but absent in CCA and AA. No IH, no decrease in LD and no CVR was seen in the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: BI resulted in: (1.) a decrease in LD in CCA due to IH, (2.) a decrease in LD in CIA due to IH and CVR, (3.) no change in LD in AA, (4.) Comparable IH development in all arteries, (5.) CCA has no vasa vasorum compared to CIA and AA, (6.) The CIA model combines good access for 2 F endovascular catheters with a decrease in LD due to IH and CVR after BI. BioMed Central 2002-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC130046/ /pubmed/12350231 Text en Copyright © 2002 Gabeler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This article is published in Open Access: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gabeler, Edward EE
van Hillegersberg, Richard
Statius van Eps, Randolph G
Sluiter, Wim
Gussenhoven, Elma J
Mulder, Paul
van Urk, Hero
A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries
title A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries
title_full A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries
title_fullStr A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries
title_short A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries
title_sort comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12350231
work_keys_str_mv AT gabeleredwardee acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT vanhillegersbergrichard acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT statiusvanepsrandolphg acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT sluiterwim acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT gussenhovenelmaj acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT mulderpaul acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT vanurkhero acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT gabeleredwardee comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT vanhillegersbergrichard comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT statiusvanepsrandolphg comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT sluiterwim comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT gussenhovenelmaj comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT mulderpaul comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries
AT vanurkhero comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries