Cargando…
A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries
BACKGROUND: Balloon injury (BI) of the rat carotid artery (CCA) is widely used to study intimal hyperplasia (IH) and decrease in lumen diameter (LD), but CCA's small diameter impedes the evaluation of endovascular therapies. Therefore, we validated BI in the aorta (AA) and iliac artery (CIA) to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12350231 |
_version_ | 1782120380883795968 |
---|---|
author | Gabeler, Edward EE van Hillegersberg, Richard Statius van Eps, Randolph G Sluiter, Wim Gussenhoven, Elma J Mulder, Paul van Urk, Hero |
author_facet | Gabeler, Edward EE van Hillegersberg, Richard Statius van Eps, Randolph G Sluiter, Wim Gussenhoven, Elma J Mulder, Paul van Urk, Hero |
author_sort | Gabeler, Edward EE |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Balloon injury (BI) of the rat carotid artery (CCA) is widely used to study intimal hyperplasia (IH) and decrease in lumen diameter (LD), but CCA's small diameter impedes the evaluation of endovascular therapies. Therefore, we validated BI in the aorta (AA) and iliac artery (CIA) to compare it with CCA. METHODS: Rats underwent BI or a sham procedure (control). Light microscopic evaluation was performed either directly or at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 16 weeks follow-up. The area of IH and the change in LD (LD at 16 weeks minus LD post BI) were compared. RESULTS: In the BI-groups the area of IH increased to 0.14 ± 0.08 mm(2) (CCA), 0.14 ± 0.03 mm(2) (CIA) and 0.12 ± 0.04 mm(2) (AA) at 16 weeks (NS). The LD decreased with 0.49 ± 0.07 mm (CCA), compared to 0.22 ± 0.07 mm (CIA) and 0.07 ± 0.10 mm (AA) at 16 weeks (p < 0.05). The constrictive vascular remodelling (CVR = wall circumference loss combined with a decrease in LD) was -0.17 ± 0.05 mm in CIA but absent in CCA and AA. No IH, no decrease in LD and no CVR was seen in the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: BI resulted in: (1.) a decrease in LD in CCA due to IH, (2.) a decrease in LD in CIA due to IH and CVR, (3.) no change in LD in AA, (4.) Comparable IH development in all arteries, (5.) CCA has no vasa vasorum compared to CIA and AA, (6.) The CIA model combines good access for 2 F endovascular catheters with a decrease in LD due to IH and CVR after BI. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-130046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1300462002-10-25 A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries Gabeler, Edward EE van Hillegersberg, Richard Statius van Eps, Randolph G Sluiter, Wim Gussenhoven, Elma J Mulder, Paul van Urk, Hero BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Balloon injury (BI) of the rat carotid artery (CCA) is widely used to study intimal hyperplasia (IH) and decrease in lumen diameter (LD), but CCA's small diameter impedes the evaluation of endovascular therapies. Therefore, we validated BI in the aorta (AA) and iliac artery (CIA) to compare it with CCA. METHODS: Rats underwent BI or a sham procedure (control). Light microscopic evaluation was performed either directly or at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 16 weeks follow-up. The area of IH and the change in LD (LD at 16 weeks minus LD post BI) were compared. RESULTS: In the BI-groups the area of IH increased to 0.14 ± 0.08 mm(2) (CCA), 0.14 ± 0.03 mm(2) (CIA) and 0.12 ± 0.04 mm(2) (AA) at 16 weeks (NS). The LD decreased with 0.49 ± 0.07 mm (CCA), compared to 0.22 ± 0.07 mm (CIA) and 0.07 ± 0.10 mm (AA) at 16 weeks (p < 0.05). The constrictive vascular remodelling (CVR = wall circumference loss combined with a decrease in LD) was -0.17 ± 0.05 mm in CIA but absent in CCA and AA. No IH, no decrease in LD and no CVR was seen in the control groups. CONCLUSIONS: BI resulted in: (1.) a decrease in LD in CCA due to IH, (2.) a decrease in LD in CIA due to IH and CVR, (3.) no change in LD in AA, (4.) Comparable IH development in all arteries, (5.) CCA has no vasa vasorum compared to CIA and AA, (6.) The CIA model combines good access for 2 F endovascular catheters with a decrease in LD due to IH and CVR after BI. BioMed Central 2002-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC130046/ /pubmed/12350231 Text en Copyright © 2002 Gabeler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This article is published in Open Access: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gabeler, Edward EE van Hillegersberg, Richard Statius van Eps, Randolph G Sluiter, Wim Gussenhoven, Elma J Mulder, Paul van Urk, Hero A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries |
title | A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries |
title_full | A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries |
title_fullStr | A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries |
title_short | A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries |
title_sort | comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12350231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gabeleredwardee acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT vanhillegersbergrichard acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT statiusvanepsrandolphg acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT sluiterwim acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT gussenhovenelmaj acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT mulderpaul acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT vanurkhero acomparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT gabeleredwardee comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT vanhillegersbergrichard comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT statiusvanepsrandolphg comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT sluiterwim comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT gussenhovenelmaj comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT mulderpaul comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries AT vanurkhero comparisonofballooninjurymodelsofendovascularlesionsinratarteries |