Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) platform

INTRODUCTION: The Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT™) is a self-contained, stretcher-based miniature intensive care unit designed by the United States Army to provide care for critically injured patients during transport and in remote settings where resources are limited. The LSTAT contai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Ken, Pearce, Frederick, Westenskow, Dwayne, Ogden, L Lazarre, Farnsworth, Steven, Peterson, Shane, White, Julia, Slade, Travis
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1538
_version_ 1782120386116190208
author Johnson, Ken
Pearce, Frederick
Westenskow, Dwayne
Ogden, L Lazarre
Farnsworth, Steven
Peterson, Shane
White, Julia
Slade, Travis
author_facet Johnson, Ken
Pearce, Frederick
Westenskow, Dwayne
Ogden, L Lazarre
Farnsworth, Steven
Peterson, Shane
White, Julia
Slade, Travis
author_sort Johnson, Ken
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT™) is a self-contained, stretcher-based miniature intensive care unit designed by the United States Army to provide care for critically injured patients during transport and in remote settings where resources are limited. The LSTAT contains conventional medical equipment that has been integrated into one platform and reduced in size to fit within the dimensional envelope of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) stretcher. This study evaluated the clinical utility of the LSTAT in simulated and real clinical environments. Our hypothesis was that the LSTAT would be equivalent to conventional equipment in detecting and treating life-threatening problems. METHODS: Thirty-one anesthesiologists and recovery room nurses compared the LSTAT with conventional monitors while managing four simulated critical events. The time required to reach a diagnosis and treatment was recorded for each simulation. Subsequently, 10 consenting adult patients were placed on the LSTAT after surgery for postoperative care in the recovery room. Questionnaires about aspects of LSTAT functionality were completed by nine nurses who cared for the patients placed on the LSTAT. RESULTS: In all of the simulations, there was no clinically significant difference in the time to diagnosis or treatment between the LSTAT and conventional equipment. All clinicians reported that they were able to manage the simulated patients properly with the LSTAT. Nursing staff reported that the LSTAT provided adequate equipment to care for the patients monitored during recovery from surgery and were able to detect critical changes in vital signs in a timely manner. DISCUSSION: Preliminary evaluation of the LSTAT in simulated and postoperative environments demonstrated that the LSTAT provided appropriate equipment to detect and manage critical events in patient care. Further work in assessing LSTAT functionality in a higher-acuity environment is warranted.
format Text
id pubmed-130145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1301452002-11-14 Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) platform Johnson, Ken Pearce, Frederick Westenskow, Dwayne Ogden, L Lazarre Farnsworth, Steven Peterson, Shane White, Julia Slade, Travis Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT™) is a self-contained, stretcher-based miniature intensive care unit designed by the United States Army to provide care for critically injured patients during transport and in remote settings where resources are limited. The LSTAT contains conventional medical equipment that has been integrated into one platform and reduced in size to fit within the dimensional envelope of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) stretcher. This study evaluated the clinical utility of the LSTAT in simulated and real clinical environments. Our hypothesis was that the LSTAT would be equivalent to conventional equipment in detecting and treating life-threatening problems. METHODS: Thirty-one anesthesiologists and recovery room nurses compared the LSTAT with conventional monitors while managing four simulated critical events. The time required to reach a diagnosis and treatment was recorded for each simulation. Subsequently, 10 consenting adult patients were placed on the LSTAT after surgery for postoperative care in the recovery room. Questionnaires about aspects of LSTAT functionality were completed by nine nurses who cared for the patients placed on the LSTAT. RESULTS: In all of the simulations, there was no clinically significant difference in the time to diagnosis or treatment between the LSTAT and conventional equipment. All clinicians reported that they were able to manage the simulated patients properly with the LSTAT. Nursing staff reported that the LSTAT provided adequate equipment to care for the patients monitored during recovery from surgery and were able to detect critical changes in vital signs in a timely manner. DISCUSSION: Preliminary evaluation of the LSTAT in simulated and postoperative environments demonstrated that the LSTAT provided appropriate equipment to detect and manage critical events in patient care. Further work in assessing LSTAT functionality in a higher-acuity environment is warranted. BioMed Central 2002 2002-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC130145/ /pubmed/12398785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1538 Text en Copyright © 2002 Johnson et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Research
Johnson, Ken
Pearce, Frederick
Westenskow, Dwayne
Ogden, L Lazarre
Farnsworth, Steven
Peterson, Shane
White, Julia
Slade, Travis
Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) platform
title Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) platform
title_full Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) platform
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) platform
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) platform
title_short Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) platform
title_sort clinical evaluation of the life support for trauma and transport (lstat) platform
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1538
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonken clinicalevaluationofthelifesupportfortraumaandtransportlstatplatform
AT pearcefrederick clinicalevaluationofthelifesupportfortraumaandtransportlstatplatform
AT westenskowdwayne clinicalevaluationofthelifesupportfortraumaandtransportlstatplatform
AT ogdenllazarre clinicalevaluationofthelifesupportfortraumaandtransportlstatplatform
AT farnsworthsteven clinicalevaluationofthelifesupportfortraumaandtransportlstatplatform
AT petersonshane clinicalevaluationofthelifesupportfortraumaandtransportlstatplatform
AT whitejulia clinicalevaluationofthelifesupportfortraumaandtransportlstatplatform
AT sladetravis clinicalevaluationofthelifesupportfortraumaandtransportlstatplatform