Cargando…
Prominent medical journals often provide insufficient information to assess the validity of studies with negative results
BACKGROUND: Physicians reading the medical literature attempt to determine whether research studies are valid. However, articles with negative results may not provide sufficient information to allow physicians to properly assess validity. METHODS: We analyzed all original research articles with nega...
Autores principales: | Hebert, Randy S, Wright, Scott M, Dittus, Robert S, Elasy, Tom A |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC131026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12437785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-1-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Consolidation of Two Prominent Journals
Publicado: (1903) -
The reporting of studies using routinely collected health data was often insufficient
por: Hemkens, Lars G., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
How Often Do the Iranian Medical Journal Editors-in-Chief Publish in Their Own Journals?
por: REAEE-ZAVAREH, Mohammad Saeid, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm
por: Bernal-Delgado, Enrique, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey
por: Hardwicke, Tom E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)