Cargando…

An acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons

BACKGROUND: Recent analyses of prokaryotic genome sequences have demonstrated the important force horizontal gene transfer constitutes in genome evolution. Horizontally acquired sequences are detectable by, among others, their dinucleotide composition (genome signature) dissimilarity with the host g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Passel, MWJ, Bart, A, Thygesen, HH, Luyf, ACM, van Kampen, AHC, van der Ende, A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1310630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16297239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-163
_version_ 1782126319272722432
author van Passel, MWJ
Bart, A
Thygesen, HH
Luyf, ACM
van Kampen, AHC
van der Ende, A
author_facet van Passel, MWJ
Bart, A
Thygesen, HH
Luyf, ACM
van Kampen, AHC
van der Ende, A
author_sort van Passel, MWJ
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent analyses of prokaryotic genome sequences have demonstrated the important force horizontal gene transfer constitutes in genome evolution. Horizontally acquired sequences are detectable by, among others, their dinucleotide composition (genome signature) dissimilarity with the host genome. Genomic islands (GIs) comprise important and interesting horizontally transferred sequences, but information about acquisition events or relatedness between GIs is scarce. In Vibrio vulnificus CMCP6, 10 and 11 GIs have previously been identified in the sequenced chromosomes I and II, respectively. We assessed the compositional similarity and putative acquisition account of these GIs using the genome signature. For this analysis we developed a new algorithm, available as a web application. RESULTS: Of 21 GIs, VvI-1 and VvI-10 of chromosome I have similar genome signatures, and while artificially divided due to a linear annotation, they are adjacent on the circular chromosome and therefore comprise one GI. Similarly, GIs VvI-3 and VvI-4 of chromosome I together with the region between these two islands are compositionally similar, suggesting that they form one GI (making a total of 19 GIs in chromosome I + chromosome II). Cluster analysis assigned the 19 GIs to 11 different branches above our conservative threshold. This suggests a limited number of compositionally similar donors or intragenomic dispersion of ancestral acquisitions. Furthermore, 2 GIs of chromosome II cluster with chromosome I, while none of the 19 GIs group with chromosome II, suggesting an unidirectional dispersal of large anomalous gene clusters from chromosome I to chromosome II. CONCLUSION: From the results, we infer 10 compositionally dissimilar donors for 19 GIs in the V. vulnificus CMCP6 genome, including chromosome I donating to chromosome II. This suggests multiple transfer events from individual donor types or from donors with similar genome signatures. Applied to other prokaryotes, this approach may elucidate the acquisition account in their genome sequences, and facilitate donor identification of GIs.
format Text
id pubmed-1310630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13106302005-12-10 An acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons van Passel, MWJ Bart, A Thygesen, HH Luyf, ACM van Kampen, AHC van der Ende, A BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent analyses of prokaryotic genome sequences have demonstrated the important force horizontal gene transfer constitutes in genome evolution. Horizontally acquired sequences are detectable by, among others, their dinucleotide composition (genome signature) dissimilarity with the host genome. Genomic islands (GIs) comprise important and interesting horizontally transferred sequences, but information about acquisition events or relatedness between GIs is scarce. In Vibrio vulnificus CMCP6, 10 and 11 GIs have previously been identified in the sequenced chromosomes I and II, respectively. We assessed the compositional similarity and putative acquisition account of these GIs using the genome signature. For this analysis we developed a new algorithm, available as a web application. RESULTS: Of 21 GIs, VvI-1 and VvI-10 of chromosome I have similar genome signatures, and while artificially divided due to a linear annotation, they are adjacent on the circular chromosome and therefore comprise one GI. Similarly, GIs VvI-3 and VvI-4 of chromosome I together with the region between these two islands are compositionally similar, suggesting that they form one GI (making a total of 19 GIs in chromosome I + chromosome II). Cluster analysis assigned the 19 GIs to 11 different branches above our conservative threshold. This suggests a limited number of compositionally similar donors or intragenomic dispersion of ancestral acquisitions. Furthermore, 2 GIs of chromosome II cluster with chromosome I, while none of the 19 GIs group with chromosome II, suggesting an unidirectional dispersal of large anomalous gene clusters from chromosome I to chromosome II. CONCLUSION: From the results, we infer 10 compositionally dissimilar donors for 19 GIs in the V. vulnificus CMCP6 genome, including chromosome I donating to chromosome II. This suggests multiple transfer events from individual donor types or from donors with similar genome signatures. Applied to other prokaryotes, this approach may elucidate the acquisition account in their genome sequences, and facilitate donor identification of GIs. BioMed Central 2005-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1310630/ /pubmed/16297239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-163 Text en Copyright © 2005 van Passel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Passel, MWJ
Bart, A
Thygesen, HH
Luyf, ACM
van Kampen, AHC
van der Ende, A
An acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons
title An acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons
title_full An acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons
title_fullStr An acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons
title_full_unstemmed An acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons
title_short An acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons
title_sort acquisition account of genomic islands based on genome signature comparisons
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1310630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16297239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-163
work_keys_str_mv AT vanpasselmwj anacquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT barta anacquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT thygesenhh anacquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT luyfacm anacquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT vankampenahc anacquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT vanderendea anacquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT vanpasselmwj acquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT barta acquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT thygesenhh acquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT luyfacm acquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT vankampenahc acquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons
AT vanderendea acquisitionaccountofgenomicislandsbasedongenomesignaturecomparisons