Cargando…
Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward
Human biomonitoring investigations have provided data on a wide array of chemicals in blood and urine and in other tissues and fluids such as hair and human milk. These data have prompted questions such as a) What is the relationship between levels of environmental chemicals in humans and external e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1310927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16263520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8197 |
_version_ | 1782126331559936000 |
---|---|
author | Bates, Michael N. Hamilton, Joshua W. LaKind, Judy S. Langenberg, Patricia O’Malley, Michael Snodgrass, Wayne |
author_facet | Bates, Michael N. Hamilton, Joshua W. LaKind, Judy S. Langenberg, Patricia O’Malley, Michael Snodgrass, Wayne |
author_sort | Bates, Michael N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human biomonitoring investigations have provided data on a wide array of chemicals in blood and urine and in other tissues and fluids such as hair and human milk. These data have prompted questions such as a) What is the relationship between levels of environmental chemicals in humans and external exposures? b) What is the baseline or “background” level against which individual levels should be compared? and c) How can internal levels be used to draw conclusions about individual and/or population health? An interdisciplinary panel was convened for a 1-day workshop in November 2004 with the charge of focusing on three specific aspects of biomonitoring: characteristics of scientifically robust biomonitoring studies, interpretation of human biomonitoring data for potential risks to human health, and communication of results, uncertainties, and limitations of biomonitoring studies. In this report we describe the recommendations of the panel. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1310927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-13109272005-12-12 Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward Bates, Michael N. Hamilton, Joshua W. LaKind, Judy S. Langenberg, Patricia O’Malley, Michael Snodgrass, Wayne Environ Health Perspect Research Human biomonitoring investigations have provided data on a wide array of chemicals in blood and urine and in other tissues and fluids such as hair and human milk. These data have prompted questions such as a) What is the relationship between levels of environmental chemicals in humans and external exposures? b) What is the baseline or “background” level against which individual levels should be compared? and c) How can internal levels be used to draw conclusions about individual and/or population health? An interdisciplinary panel was convened for a 1-day workshop in November 2004 with the charge of focusing on three specific aspects of biomonitoring: characteristics of scientifically robust biomonitoring studies, interpretation of human biomonitoring data for potential risks to human health, and communication of results, uncertainties, and limitations of biomonitoring studies. In this report we describe the recommendations of the panel. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2005-11 2005-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1310927/ /pubmed/16263520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8197 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Research Bates, Michael N. Hamilton, Joshua W. LaKind, Judy S. Langenberg, Patricia O’Malley, Michael Snodgrass, Wayne Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward |
title | Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward |
title_full | Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward |
title_fullStr | Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward |
title_full_unstemmed | Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward |
title_short | Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward |
title_sort | workgroup report: biomonitoring study design, interpretation, and communication—lessons learned and path forward |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1310927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16263520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT batesmichaeln workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward AT hamiltonjoshuaw workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward AT lakindjudys workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward AT langenbergpatricia workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward AT omalleymichael workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward AT snodgrasswayne workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward |