Cargando…

Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward

Human biomonitoring investigations have provided data on a wide array of chemicals in blood and urine and in other tissues and fluids such as hair and human milk. These data have prompted questions such as a) What is the relationship between levels of environmental chemicals in humans and external e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bates, Michael N., Hamilton, Joshua W., LaKind, Judy S., Langenberg, Patricia, O’Malley, Michael, Snodgrass, Wayne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1310927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16263520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8197
_version_ 1782126331559936000
author Bates, Michael N.
Hamilton, Joshua W.
LaKind, Judy S.
Langenberg, Patricia
O’Malley, Michael
Snodgrass, Wayne
author_facet Bates, Michael N.
Hamilton, Joshua W.
LaKind, Judy S.
Langenberg, Patricia
O’Malley, Michael
Snodgrass, Wayne
author_sort Bates, Michael N.
collection PubMed
description Human biomonitoring investigations have provided data on a wide array of chemicals in blood and urine and in other tissues and fluids such as hair and human milk. These data have prompted questions such as a) What is the relationship between levels of environmental chemicals in humans and external exposures? b) What is the baseline or “background” level against which individual levels should be compared? and c) How can internal levels be used to draw conclusions about individual and/or population health? An interdisciplinary panel was convened for a 1-day workshop in November 2004 with the charge of focusing on three specific aspects of biomonitoring: characteristics of scientifically robust biomonitoring studies, interpretation of human biomonitoring data for potential risks to human health, and communication of results, uncertainties, and limitations of biomonitoring studies. In this report we describe the recommendations of the panel.
format Text
id pubmed-1310927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13109272005-12-12 Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward Bates, Michael N. Hamilton, Joshua W. LaKind, Judy S. Langenberg, Patricia O’Malley, Michael Snodgrass, Wayne Environ Health Perspect Research Human biomonitoring investigations have provided data on a wide array of chemicals in blood and urine and in other tissues and fluids such as hair and human milk. These data have prompted questions such as a) What is the relationship between levels of environmental chemicals in humans and external exposures? b) What is the baseline or “background” level against which individual levels should be compared? and c) How can internal levels be used to draw conclusions about individual and/or population health? An interdisciplinary panel was convened for a 1-day workshop in November 2004 with the charge of focusing on three specific aspects of biomonitoring: characteristics of scientifically robust biomonitoring studies, interpretation of human biomonitoring data for potential risks to human health, and communication of results, uncertainties, and limitations of biomonitoring studies. In this report we describe the recommendations of the panel. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2005-11 2005-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1310927/ /pubmed/16263520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8197 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Bates, Michael N.
Hamilton, Joshua W.
LaKind, Judy S.
Langenberg, Patricia
O’Malley, Michael
Snodgrass, Wayne
Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward
title Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward
title_full Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward
title_fullStr Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward
title_full_unstemmed Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward
title_short Workgroup Report: Biomonitoring Study Design, Interpretation, and Communication—Lessons Learned and Path Forward
title_sort workgroup report: biomonitoring study design, interpretation, and communication—lessons learned and path forward
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1310927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16263520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8197
work_keys_str_mv AT batesmichaeln workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward
AT hamiltonjoshuaw workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward
AT lakindjudys workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward
AT langenbergpatricia workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward
AT omalleymichael workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward
AT snodgrasswayne workgroupreportbiomonitoringstudydesigninterpretationandcommunicationlessonslearnedandpathforward