Cargando…
SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description
OBJECTIVE: Risk adjustment systems now in use were developed more than a decade ago and lack prognostic performance. Objective of the SAPS 3 study was to collect data about risk factors and outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in order to develop a new, improved...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1315314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16132893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6 |
_version_ | 1782126375345324032 |
---|---|
author | Metnitz, Philipp G. H. Moreno, Rui P. Almeida, Eduardo Jordan, Barbara Bauer, Peter Campos, Ricardo Abizanda Iapichino, Gaetano Edbrooke, David Capuzzo, Maurizia Le Gall, Jean-Roger |
author_facet | Metnitz, Philipp G. H. Moreno, Rui P. Almeida, Eduardo Jordan, Barbara Bauer, Peter Campos, Ricardo Abizanda Iapichino, Gaetano Edbrooke, David Capuzzo, Maurizia Le Gall, Jean-Roger |
author_sort | Metnitz, Philipp G. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Risk adjustment systems now in use were developed more than a decade ago and lack prognostic performance. Objective of the SAPS 3 study was to collect data about risk factors and outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in order to develop a new, improved model for risk adjustment. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 19,577 patients consecutively admitted to 307 ICUs from 14 October to 15 December 2002. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Data were collected at ICU admission, on days 1, 2 and 3, and the last day of the ICU stay. Data included sociodemographics, chronic conditions, diagnostic information, physiological derangement at ICU admission, number and severity of organ dysfunctions, length of ICU and hospital stay, and vital status at ICU and hospital discharge. Data reliability was tested with use of kappa statistics and intraclass-correlation coefficients, which were >0.85 for the majority of variables. Completeness of the data was also satisfactory, with 1 [0–3] SAPS II parameter missing per patient. Prognostic performance of the SAPS II was poor, with significant differences between observed and expected mortality rates for the overall cohort and four (of seven) defined regions, and poor calibration for most tested subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS 3 study was able to provide a high-quality multinational database, reflecting heterogeneity of current ICU case-mix and typology. The poor performance of SAPS II in this cohort underscores the need for development of a new risk adjustment system for critically ill patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: Electronic supplementary material is included in the online fulltext version of this article and accessible for authorised users: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1315314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-13153142006-02-08 SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description Metnitz, Philipp G. H. Moreno, Rui P. Almeida, Eduardo Jordan, Barbara Bauer, Peter Campos, Ricardo Abizanda Iapichino, Gaetano Edbrooke, David Capuzzo, Maurizia Le Gall, Jean-Roger Intensive Care Med Original OBJECTIVE: Risk adjustment systems now in use were developed more than a decade ago and lack prognostic performance. Objective of the SAPS 3 study was to collect data about risk factors and outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in order to develop a new, improved model for risk adjustment. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 19,577 patients consecutively admitted to 307 ICUs from 14 October to 15 December 2002. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Data were collected at ICU admission, on days 1, 2 and 3, and the last day of the ICU stay. Data included sociodemographics, chronic conditions, diagnostic information, physiological derangement at ICU admission, number and severity of organ dysfunctions, length of ICU and hospital stay, and vital status at ICU and hospital discharge. Data reliability was tested with use of kappa statistics and intraclass-correlation coefficients, which were >0.85 for the majority of variables. Completeness of the data was also satisfactory, with 1 [0–3] SAPS II parameter missing per patient. Prognostic performance of the SAPS II was poor, with significant differences between observed and expected mortality rates for the overall cohort and four (of seven) defined regions, and poor calibration for most tested subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS 3 study was able to provide a high-quality multinational database, reflecting heterogeneity of current ICU case-mix and typology. The poor performance of SAPS II in this cohort underscores the need for development of a new risk adjustment system for critically ill patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: Electronic supplementary material is included in the online fulltext version of this article and accessible for authorised users: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6 Springer-Verlag 2005-08-17 2005-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1315314/ /pubmed/16132893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2005 |
spellingShingle | Original Metnitz, Philipp G. H. Moreno, Rui P. Almeida, Eduardo Jordan, Barbara Bauer, Peter Campos, Ricardo Abizanda Iapichino, Gaetano Edbrooke, David Capuzzo, Maurizia Le Gall, Jean-Roger SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description |
title | SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description |
title_full | SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description |
title_fullStr | SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description |
title_full_unstemmed | SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description |
title_short | SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description |
title_sort | saps 3—from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. part 1: objectives, methods and cohort description |
topic | Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1315314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16132893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metnitzphilippgh saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT morenoruip saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT almeidaeduardo saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT jordanbarbara saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT bauerpeter saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT camposricardoabizanda saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT iapichinogaetano saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT edbrookedavid saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT capuzzomaurizia saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT legalljeanroger saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription AT saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart1objectivesmethodsandcohortdescription |