Cargando…

SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model to assess severity of illness and predict vital status at hospital discharge based on ICU admission data. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 16,784 patients consecutively admitted to 303 intensive care units fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreno, Rui P., Metnitz, Philipp G. H., Almeida, Eduardo, Jordan, Barbara, Bauer, Peter, Campos, Ricardo Abizanda, Iapichino, Gaetano, Edbrooke, David, Capuzzo, Maurizia, Le Gall, Jean-Roger
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1315315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16132892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5
_version_ 1782126375572865024
author Moreno, Rui P.
Metnitz, Philipp G. H.
Almeida, Eduardo
Jordan, Barbara
Bauer, Peter
Campos, Ricardo Abizanda
Iapichino, Gaetano
Edbrooke, David
Capuzzo, Maurizia
Le Gall, Jean-Roger
author_facet Moreno, Rui P.
Metnitz, Philipp G. H.
Almeida, Eduardo
Jordan, Barbara
Bauer, Peter
Campos, Ricardo Abizanda
Iapichino, Gaetano
Edbrooke, David
Capuzzo, Maurizia
Le Gall, Jean-Roger
author_sort Moreno, Rui P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a model to assess severity of illness and predict vital status at hospital discharge based on ICU admission data. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 16,784 patients consecutively admitted to 303 intensive care units from 14 October to 15 December 2002. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: ICU admission data (recorded within ±1 h) were used, describing: prior chronic conditions and diseases; circumstances related to and physiologic derangement at ICU admission. Selection of variables for inclusion into the model used different complementary strategies. For cross-validation, the model-building procedure was run five times, using randomly selected four fifths of the sample as a development- and the remaining fifth as validation-set. Logistic regression methods were then used to reduce complexity of the model. Final estimates of regression coefficients were determined by use of multilevel logistic regression. Variables selection and weighting were further checked by bootstraping (at patient level and at ICU level). Twenty variables were selected for the final model, which exhibited good discrimination (aROC curve 0.848), without major differences across patient typologies. Calibration was also satisfactory (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test Ĥ=10.56, p=0.39, Ĉ=14.29, p=0.16). Customised equations for major areas of the world were computed and demonstrate a good overall goodness-of-fit. CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS 3 admission score is able to predict vital status at hospital discharge with use of data recorded at ICU admission. Furthermore, SAPS 3 conceptually dissociates evaluation of the individual patient from evaluation of the ICU and thus allows them to be assessed at their respective reference levels. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: Electronic supplementary material is included in the online fulltext version of this article and accessible for authorised users: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5
format Text
id pubmed-1315315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13153152006-02-08 SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission Moreno, Rui P. Metnitz, Philipp G. H. Almeida, Eduardo Jordan, Barbara Bauer, Peter Campos, Ricardo Abizanda Iapichino, Gaetano Edbrooke, David Capuzzo, Maurizia Le Gall, Jean-Roger Intensive Care Med Original OBJECTIVE: To develop a model to assess severity of illness and predict vital status at hospital discharge based on ICU admission data. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A total of 16,784 patients consecutively admitted to 303 intensive care units from 14 October to 15 December 2002. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: ICU admission data (recorded within ±1 h) were used, describing: prior chronic conditions and diseases; circumstances related to and physiologic derangement at ICU admission. Selection of variables for inclusion into the model used different complementary strategies. For cross-validation, the model-building procedure was run five times, using randomly selected four fifths of the sample as a development- and the remaining fifth as validation-set. Logistic regression methods were then used to reduce complexity of the model. Final estimates of regression coefficients were determined by use of multilevel logistic regression. Variables selection and weighting were further checked by bootstraping (at patient level and at ICU level). Twenty variables were selected for the final model, which exhibited good discrimination (aROC curve 0.848), without major differences across patient typologies. Calibration was also satisfactory (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test Ĥ=10.56, p=0.39, Ĉ=14.29, p=0.16). Customised equations for major areas of the world were computed and demonstrate a good overall goodness-of-fit. CONCLUSIONS: The SAPS 3 admission score is able to predict vital status at hospital discharge with use of data recorded at ICU admission. Furthermore, SAPS 3 conceptually dissociates evaluation of the individual patient from evaluation of the ICU and thus allows them to be assessed at their respective reference levels. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: Electronic supplementary material is included in the online fulltext version of this article and accessible for authorised users: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5 Springer-Verlag 2005-08-17 2005-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1315315/ /pubmed/16132892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5 Text en © Springer-Verlag 2005
spellingShingle Original
Moreno, Rui P.
Metnitz, Philipp G. H.
Almeida, Eduardo
Jordan, Barbara
Bauer, Peter
Campos, Ricardo Abizanda
Iapichino, Gaetano
Edbrooke, David
Capuzzo, Maurizia
Le Gall, Jean-Roger
SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission
title SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission
title_full SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission
title_fullStr SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission
title_full_unstemmed SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission
title_short SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission
title_sort saps 3—from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. part 2: development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at icu admission
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1315315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16132892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5
work_keys_str_mv AT morenoruip saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT metnitzphilippgh saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT almeidaeduardo saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT jordanbarbara saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT bauerpeter saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT camposricardoabizanda saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT iapichinogaetano saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT edbrookedavid saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT capuzzomaurizia saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT legalljeanroger saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission
AT saps3fromevaluationofthepatienttoevaluationoftheintensivecareunitpart2developmentofaprognosticmodelforhospitalmortalityaticuadmission