Cargando…

The "impact factor" revisited

The number of scientific journals has become so large that individuals, institutions and institutional libraries cannot completely store their physical content. In order to prioritize the choice of quality information sources, librarians and scientists are in need of reliable decision aids. The &quo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Peng, Loh, Marie, Mondry, Adrian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1315333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16324222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-2-7
_version_ 1782126380705644544
author Dong, Peng
Loh, Marie
Mondry, Adrian
author_facet Dong, Peng
Loh, Marie
Mondry, Adrian
author_sort Dong, Peng
collection PubMed
description The number of scientific journals has become so large that individuals, institutions and institutional libraries cannot completely store their physical content. In order to prioritize the choice of quality information sources, librarians and scientists are in need of reliable decision aids. The "impact factor" (IF) is the most commonly used assessment aid for deciding which journals should receive a scholarly submission or attention from research readership. It is also an often misunderstood tool. This narrative review explains how the IF is calculated, how bias is introduced into the calculation, which questions the IF can or cannot answer, and how different professional groups can benefit from IF use.
format Text
id pubmed-1315333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13153332005-12-16 The "impact factor" revisited Dong, Peng Loh, Marie Mondry, Adrian Biomed Digit Libr Review The number of scientific journals has become so large that individuals, institutions and institutional libraries cannot completely store their physical content. In order to prioritize the choice of quality information sources, librarians and scientists are in need of reliable decision aids. The "impact factor" (IF) is the most commonly used assessment aid for deciding which journals should receive a scholarly submission or attention from research readership. It is also an often misunderstood tool. This narrative review explains how the IF is calculated, how bias is introduced into the calculation, which questions the IF can or cannot answer, and how different professional groups can benefit from IF use. BioMed Central 2005-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1315333/ /pubmed/16324222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-2-7 Text en Copyright © 2005 Dong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Dong, Peng
Loh, Marie
Mondry, Adrian
The "impact factor" revisited
title The "impact factor" revisited
title_full The "impact factor" revisited
title_fullStr The "impact factor" revisited
title_full_unstemmed The "impact factor" revisited
title_short The "impact factor" revisited
title_sort "impact factor" revisited
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1315333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16324222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-2-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dongpeng theimpactfactorrevisited
AT lohmarie theimpactfactorrevisited
AT mondryadrian theimpactfactorrevisited
AT dongpeng impactfactorrevisited
AT lohmarie impactfactorrevisited
AT mondryadrian impactfactorrevisited