Cargando…

Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice

BACKGROUND: This study seeks to compare the ability of repeatable invasive and noninvasive lung function methods to assess allergen-specific and cholinergic airway responsiveness (AR) in intact, spontaneously breathing BALB/c mice. METHODS: Using noninvasive head-out body plethysmography and the dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glaab, Thomas, Ziegert, Michaela, Baelder, Ralf, Korolewitz, Regina, Braun, Armin, Hohlfeld, Jens M, Mitzner, Wayne, Krug, Norbert, Hoymann, Heinz G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1316879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16309547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-139
_version_ 1782126401482129408
author Glaab, Thomas
Ziegert, Michaela
Baelder, Ralf
Korolewitz, Regina
Braun, Armin
Hohlfeld, Jens M
Mitzner, Wayne
Krug, Norbert
Hoymann, Heinz G
author_facet Glaab, Thomas
Ziegert, Michaela
Baelder, Ralf
Korolewitz, Regina
Braun, Armin
Hohlfeld, Jens M
Mitzner, Wayne
Krug, Norbert
Hoymann, Heinz G
author_sort Glaab, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study seeks to compare the ability of repeatable invasive and noninvasive lung function methods to assess allergen-specific and cholinergic airway responsiveness (AR) in intact, spontaneously breathing BALB/c mice. METHODS: Using noninvasive head-out body plethysmography and the decrease in tidal midexpiratory flow (EF(50)), we determined early AR (EAR) to inhaled Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in conscious mice. These measurements were paralleled by invasive determination of pulmonary conductance (GL), dynamic compliance (Cdyn) and EF(50 )in another group of anesthetized, orotracheally intubated mice. RESULTS: With both methods, allergic mice, sensitized and boosted with A. fumigatus, elicited allergen-specific EAR to A. fumigatus (p < 0.05 versus controls). Dose-response studies to aerosolized methacholine (MCh) were performed in the same animals 48 h later, showing that allergic mice relative to controls were distinctly more responsive (p < 0.05) and revealed acute airway inflammation as evidenced from increased eosinophils and lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage. CONCLUSION: We conclude that invasive and noninvasive pulmonary function tests are capable of detecting both allergen-specific and cholinergic AR in intact, allergic mice. The invasive determination of GL and Cdyn is superior in sensitivity, whereas the noninvasive EF(50 )method is particularly appropriate for quick and repeatable screening of respiratory function in large numbers of conscious mice.
format Text
id pubmed-1316879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13168792006-11-24 Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice Glaab, Thomas Ziegert, Michaela Baelder, Ralf Korolewitz, Regina Braun, Armin Hohlfeld, Jens M Mitzner, Wayne Krug, Norbert Hoymann, Heinz G Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: This study seeks to compare the ability of repeatable invasive and noninvasive lung function methods to assess allergen-specific and cholinergic airway responsiveness (AR) in intact, spontaneously breathing BALB/c mice. METHODS: Using noninvasive head-out body plethysmography and the decrease in tidal midexpiratory flow (EF(50)), we determined early AR (EAR) to inhaled Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in conscious mice. These measurements were paralleled by invasive determination of pulmonary conductance (GL), dynamic compliance (Cdyn) and EF(50 )in another group of anesthetized, orotracheally intubated mice. RESULTS: With both methods, allergic mice, sensitized and boosted with A. fumigatus, elicited allergen-specific EAR to A. fumigatus (p < 0.05 versus controls). Dose-response studies to aerosolized methacholine (MCh) were performed in the same animals 48 h later, showing that allergic mice relative to controls were distinctly more responsive (p < 0.05) and revealed acute airway inflammation as evidenced from increased eosinophils and lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage. CONCLUSION: We conclude that invasive and noninvasive pulmonary function tests are capable of detecting both allergen-specific and cholinergic AR in intact, allergic mice. The invasive determination of GL and Cdyn is superior in sensitivity, whereas the noninvasive EF(50 )method is particularly appropriate for quick and repeatable screening of respiratory function in large numbers of conscious mice. BioMed Central 2005 2005-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1316879/ /pubmed/16309547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-139 Text en Copyright © 2005 Glaab et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Glaab, Thomas
Ziegert, Michaela
Baelder, Ralf
Korolewitz, Regina
Braun, Armin
Hohlfeld, Jens M
Mitzner, Wayne
Krug, Norbert
Hoymann, Heinz G
Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice
title Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice
title_full Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice
title_fullStr Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice
title_full_unstemmed Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice
title_short Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice
title_sort invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1316879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16309547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-139
work_keys_str_mv AT glaabthomas invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice
AT ziegertmichaela invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice
AT baelderralf invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice
AT korolewitzregina invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice
AT braunarmin invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice
AT hohlfeldjensm invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice
AT mitznerwayne invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice
AT krugnorbert invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice
AT hoymannheinzg invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice