Cargando…
Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice
BACKGROUND: This study seeks to compare the ability of repeatable invasive and noninvasive lung function methods to assess allergen-specific and cholinergic airway responsiveness (AR) in intact, spontaneously breathing BALB/c mice. METHODS: Using noninvasive head-out body plethysmography and the dec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1316879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16309547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-139 |
_version_ | 1782126401482129408 |
---|---|
author | Glaab, Thomas Ziegert, Michaela Baelder, Ralf Korolewitz, Regina Braun, Armin Hohlfeld, Jens M Mitzner, Wayne Krug, Norbert Hoymann, Heinz G |
author_facet | Glaab, Thomas Ziegert, Michaela Baelder, Ralf Korolewitz, Regina Braun, Armin Hohlfeld, Jens M Mitzner, Wayne Krug, Norbert Hoymann, Heinz G |
author_sort | Glaab, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study seeks to compare the ability of repeatable invasive and noninvasive lung function methods to assess allergen-specific and cholinergic airway responsiveness (AR) in intact, spontaneously breathing BALB/c mice. METHODS: Using noninvasive head-out body plethysmography and the decrease in tidal midexpiratory flow (EF(50)), we determined early AR (EAR) to inhaled Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in conscious mice. These measurements were paralleled by invasive determination of pulmonary conductance (GL), dynamic compliance (Cdyn) and EF(50 )in another group of anesthetized, orotracheally intubated mice. RESULTS: With both methods, allergic mice, sensitized and boosted with A. fumigatus, elicited allergen-specific EAR to A. fumigatus (p < 0.05 versus controls). Dose-response studies to aerosolized methacholine (MCh) were performed in the same animals 48 h later, showing that allergic mice relative to controls were distinctly more responsive (p < 0.05) and revealed acute airway inflammation as evidenced from increased eosinophils and lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage. CONCLUSION: We conclude that invasive and noninvasive pulmonary function tests are capable of detecting both allergen-specific and cholinergic AR in intact, allergic mice. The invasive determination of GL and Cdyn is superior in sensitivity, whereas the noninvasive EF(50 )method is particularly appropriate for quick and repeatable screening of respiratory function in large numbers of conscious mice. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1316879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-13168792006-11-24 Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice Glaab, Thomas Ziegert, Michaela Baelder, Ralf Korolewitz, Regina Braun, Armin Hohlfeld, Jens M Mitzner, Wayne Krug, Norbert Hoymann, Heinz G Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: This study seeks to compare the ability of repeatable invasive and noninvasive lung function methods to assess allergen-specific and cholinergic airway responsiveness (AR) in intact, spontaneously breathing BALB/c mice. METHODS: Using noninvasive head-out body plethysmography and the decrease in tidal midexpiratory flow (EF(50)), we determined early AR (EAR) to inhaled Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in conscious mice. These measurements were paralleled by invasive determination of pulmonary conductance (GL), dynamic compliance (Cdyn) and EF(50 )in another group of anesthetized, orotracheally intubated mice. RESULTS: With both methods, allergic mice, sensitized and boosted with A. fumigatus, elicited allergen-specific EAR to A. fumigatus (p < 0.05 versus controls). Dose-response studies to aerosolized methacholine (MCh) were performed in the same animals 48 h later, showing that allergic mice relative to controls were distinctly more responsive (p < 0.05) and revealed acute airway inflammation as evidenced from increased eosinophils and lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage. CONCLUSION: We conclude that invasive and noninvasive pulmonary function tests are capable of detecting both allergen-specific and cholinergic AR in intact, allergic mice. The invasive determination of GL and Cdyn is superior in sensitivity, whereas the noninvasive EF(50 )method is particularly appropriate for quick and repeatable screening of respiratory function in large numbers of conscious mice. BioMed Central 2005 2005-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1316879/ /pubmed/16309547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-139 Text en Copyright © 2005 Glaab et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Glaab, Thomas Ziegert, Michaela Baelder, Ralf Korolewitz, Regina Braun, Armin Hohlfeld, Jens M Mitzner, Wayne Krug, Norbert Hoymann, Heinz G Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice |
title | Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice |
title_full | Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice |
title_fullStr | Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice |
title_short | Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice |
title_sort | invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1316879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16309547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glaabthomas invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice AT ziegertmichaela invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice AT baelderralf invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice AT korolewitzregina invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice AT braunarmin invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice AT hohlfeldjensm invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice AT mitznerwayne invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice AT krugnorbert invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice AT hoymannheinzg invasiveversusnoninvasivemeasurementofallergicandcholinergicairwayresponsivenessinmice |