Cargando…

Unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: A prospective, longitudinal study

BACKGROUND: Personal statements and referees' reports are widely used on medical school application forms, particularly in the UK, to assess the suitability of candidates for a career in medicine. However there are few studies which assess the validity of such information for predicting unhappi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McManus, IC, Iqbal, Sheeraz, Chandrarajan, Amuthan, Ferguson, E, Leaviss, Joanna
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1325230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16351718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-38
_version_ 1782126474384375808
author McManus, IC
Iqbal, Sheeraz
Chandrarajan, Amuthan
Ferguson, E
Leaviss, Joanna
author_facet McManus, IC
Iqbal, Sheeraz
Chandrarajan, Amuthan
Ferguson, E
Leaviss, Joanna
author_sort McManus, IC
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Personal statements and referees' reports are widely used on medical school application forms, particularly in the UK, to assess the suitability of candidates for a career in medicine. However there are few studies which assess the validity of such information for predicting unhappiness or dissatisfaction with a career in medicine. Here we combine data from a long-term prospective study of medical student selection and training, with an experimental approach in which a large number of assessors used a paired comparison technique to predict outcome. METHODS: Data from a large-scale prospective study of students applying to UK medical schools in 1990 were used to identify 40 pairs of doctors, matched by sex, for whom personal statements and referees' reports were available, and who in a 2002/3 follow-up study, one pair member was very satisfied and the other very dissatisfied with medicine as a career. In 2005, 96 assessors, who were experienced medical school selectors, doctors, medical students or psychology students, used information from the doctors' original applications to judge which member of each pair of doctors was the happier, more satisfied doctor. RESULTS: None of the groups of assessors were significantly different from chance expectations in using applicants' personal statements and the referees' reports to predict actual future satisfaction or dissatisfaction, the distribution being similar to binomial expectations. However judgements of pairs of application forms from pairs of doctors showed a non-binomial distribution, indicating consensus among assessors as to which doctor would be the happy doctor (although the consensus was wrong in half the cases). Assessors taking longer to do the task concurred more. Consensus judgements seem mainly to be based on referees' predictions of academic achievement (even though academic achievement is not actually a valid predictor of happiness or satisfaction). CONCLUSION: Although widely used in medical student selection to assess motivation, interest and commitment to a medical career, the personal statement and the referee's report cannot validly be used by assessors, including experienced medical school selectors, to identify doctors who will subsequently be dissatisfied with a medical career.
format Text
id pubmed-1325230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13252302006-01-07 Unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: A prospective, longitudinal study McManus, IC Iqbal, Sheeraz Chandrarajan, Amuthan Ferguson, E Leaviss, Joanna BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Personal statements and referees' reports are widely used on medical school application forms, particularly in the UK, to assess the suitability of candidates for a career in medicine. However there are few studies which assess the validity of such information for predicting unhappiness or dissatisfaction with a career in medicine. Here we combine data from a long-term prospective study of medical student selection and training, with an experimental approach in which a large number of assessors used a paired comparison technique to predict outcome. METHODS: Data from a large-scale prospective study of students applying to UK medical schools in 1990 were used to identify 40 pairs of doctors, matched by sex, for whom personal statements and referees' reports were available, and who in a 2002/3 follow-up study, one pair member was very satisfied and the other very dissatisfied with medicine as a career. In 2005, 96 assessors, who were experienced medical school selectors, doctors, medical students or psychology students, used information from the doctors' original applications to judge which member of each pair of doctors was the happier, more satisfied doctor. RESULTS: None of the groups of assessors were significantly different from chance expectations in using applicants' personal statements and the referees' reports to predict actual future satisfaction or dissatisfaction, the distribution being similar to binomial expectations. However judgements of pairs of application forms from pairs of doctors showed a non-binomial distribution, indicating consensus among assessors as to which doctor would be the happy doctor (although the consensus was wrong in half the cases). Assessors taking longer to do the task concurred more. Consensus judgements seem mainly to be based on referees' predictions of academic achievement (even though academic achievement is not actually a valid predictor of happiness or satisfaction). CONCLUSION: Although widely used in medical student selection to assess motivation, interest and commitment to a medical career, the personal statement and the referee's report cannot validly be used by assessors, including experienced medical school selectors, to identify doctors who will subsequently be dissatisfied with a medical career. BioMed Central 2005-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1325230/ /pubmed/16351718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-38 Text en Copyright © 2005 McManus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McManus, IC
Iqbal, Sheeraz
Chandrarajan, Amuthan
Ferguson, E
Leaviss, Joanna
Unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: A prospective, longitudinal study
title Unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: A prospective, longitudinal study
title_full Unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: A prospective, longitudinal study
title_fullStr Unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: A prospective, longitudinal study
title_full_unstemmed Unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: A prospective, longitudinal study
title_short Unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: A prospective, longitudinal study
title_sort unhappiness and dissatisfaction in doctors cannot be predicted by selectors from medical school application forms: a prospective, longitudinal study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1325230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16351718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-38
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmanusic unhappinessanddissatisfactionindoctorscannotbepredictedbyselectorsfrommedicalschoolapplicationformsaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT iqbalsheeraz unhappinessanddissatisfactionindoctorscannotbepredictedbyselectorsfrommedicalschoolapplicationformsaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT chandrarajanamuthan unhappinessanddissatisfactionindoctorscannotbepredictedbyselectorsfrommedicalschoolapplicationformsaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT fergusone unhappinessanddissatisfactionindoctorscannotbepredictedbyselectorsfrommedicalschoolapplicationformsaprospectivelongitudinalstudy
AT leavissjoanna unhappinessanddissatisfactionindoctorscannotbepredictedbyselectorsfrommedicalschoolapplicationformsaprospectivelongitudinalstudy