Cargando…

The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Adherence with medication taking is a major barrier to physiologic control in diabetes and many strategies for improving adherence are in use. We sought to describe the use of mnemonic devices and other adherence aids by adults with diabetes and to investigate their association with cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Littenberg, Benjamin, MacLean, Charles D, Hurowitz, Laurie
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1334208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16396688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-1
_version_ 1782126564761141248
author Littenberg, Benjamin
MacLean, Charles D
Hurowitz, Laurie
author_facet Littenberg, Benjamin
MacLean, Charles D
Hurowitz, Laurie
author_sort Littenberg, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adherence with medication taking is a major barrier to physiologic control in diabetes and many strategies for improving adherence are in use. We sought to describe the use of mnemonic devices and other adherence aids by adults with diabetes and to investigate their association with control of hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. METHODS: Cross sectional survey of diabetic adults randomly selected from Primary Care practices in the Vermont Diabetes Information System. We used linear regression to examine the associations between the use of various aids and physiologic control among subjects who used oral agents for hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension. RESULTS: 289 subjects (mean age 65.4 years; 51% female) used medications for all three conditions. Adherence aids were reported by 80%. The most popular were day-of-the-week pill boxes (50%), putting the pills in a special place (41%), and associating pill taking with a daily event such as a meal, TV show, or bedtime (11%). After adjusting for age, sex, marital status, income, and education, those who used a special place had better glycemic control (A1C -0.36%; P = .04) and systolic blood pressure (-5.9 mm Hg; P = .05) than those who used no aids. Those who used a daily event had better A1C (-0.56%; P = .01) than patients who used no aids. CONCLUSION: Although adherence aids are in common use among adults with diabetes, there is little evidence that they are efficacious. In this study, we found a few statistically significant associations with adherence aids and better diabetes control. However, these findings could be attributed to multiple comparisons or unmeasured confounders. Until more rigorous evaluations are available, it seems reasonable to recommend keeping medicines in a special place for diabetic adults prescribed multiple medications.
format Text
id pubmed-1334208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13342082006-01-19 The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional survey Littenberg, Benjamin MacLean, Charles D Hurowitz, Laurie BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Adherence with medication taking is a major barrier to physiologic control in diabetes and many strategies for improving adherence are in use. We sought to describe the use of mnemonic devices and other adherence aids by adults with diabetes and to investigate their association with control of hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. METHODS: Cross sectional survey of diabetic adults randomly selected from Primary Care practices in the Vermont Diabetes Information System. We used linear regression to examine the associations between the use of various aids and physiologic control among subjects who used oral agents for hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension. RESULTS: 289 subjects (mean age 65.4 years; 51% female) used medications for all three conditions. Adherence aids were reported by 80%. The most popular were day-of-the-week pill boxes (50%), putting the pills in a special place (41%), and associating pill taking with a daily event such as a meal, TV show, or bedtime (11%). After adjusting for age, sex, marital status, income, and education, those who used a special place had better glycemic control (A1C -0.36%; P = .04) and systolic blood pressure (-5.9 mm Hg; P = .05) than those who used no aids. Those who used a daily event had better A1C (-0.56%; P = .01) than patients who used no aids. CONCLUSION: Although adherence aids are in common use among adults with diabetes, there is little evidence that they are efficacious. In this study, we found a few statistically significant associations with adherence aids and better diabetes control. However, these findings could be attributed to multiple comparisons or unmeasured confounders. Until more rigorous evaluations are available, it seems reasonable to recommend keeping medicines in a special place for diabetic adults prescribed multiple medications. BioMed Central 2006-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1334208/ /pubmed/16396688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-1 Text en Copyright © 2006 Littenberg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Littenberg, Benjamin
MacLean, Charles D
Hurowitz, Laurie
The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional survey
title The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional survey
title_full The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional survey
title_short The use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional survey
title_sort use of adherence aids by adults with diabetes: a cross-sectional survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1334208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16396688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-1
work_keys_str_mv AT littenbergbenjamin theuseofadherenceaidsbyadultswithdiabetesacrosssectionalsurvey
AT macleancharlesd theuseofadherenceaidsbyadultswithdiabetesacrosssectionalsurvey
AT hurowitzlaurie theuseofadherenceaidsbyadultswithdiabetesacrosssectionalsurvey
AT littenbergbenjamin useofadherenceaidsbyadultswithdiabetesacrosssectionalsurvey
AT macleancharlesd useofadherenceaidsbyadultswithdiabetesacrosssectionalsurvey
AT hurowitzlaurie useofadherenceaidsbyadultswithdiabetesacrosssectionalsurvey