Cargando…
Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain
BACKGROUND: Reproducibility measurements of the range of motion are an important prerequisite for the interpretation of study results. The aim of the study is to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility of the measurement of active Range of Motion (ROM) in patients with neck pain using...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1343553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16351719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-59 |
_version_ | 1782126579870072832 |
---|---|
author | Hoving, Jan Lucas Pool, Jan JM van Mameren, Henk Devillé, Walter JLM Assendelft, Willem JJ de Vet, Henrica CW de Winter, Andrea F Koes, Bart W Bouter, Lex M |
author_facet | Hoving, Jan Lucas Pool, Jan JM van Mameren, Henk Devillé, Walter JLM Assendelft, Willem JJ de Vet, Henrica CW de Winter, Andrea F Koes, Bart W Bouter, Lex M |
author_sort | Hoving, Jan Lucas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reproducibility measurements of the range of motion are an important prerequisite for the interpretation of study results. The aim of the study is to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility of the measurement of active Range of Motion (ROM) in patients with neck pain using the Cybex Electronic Digital Inclinometer-320 (EDI-320). METHODS: In an outpatient clinic in a primary care setting 32 patients with at least 2 weeks of pain and/or stiffness in the neck were randomly assessed, in a test- retest design with blinded raters using a standardized measurement protocol. Cervical flexion-extension, lateral flexion and rotation were assessed. RESULTS: Reliability expressed by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was 0.93 (lateral flexion) or higher for intra-rater reliability and 0.89 (lateral flexion) or higher for inter-rater reliability. The 95% limits of agreement for intra-rater agreement, expressing the range of the differences between two ratings were -2.5 ± 11.1° for flexion-extension, -0.1 ± 10.4° for lateral flexion and -5.9 ± 13.5° for rotation. For inter-rater agreement the limits of agreement were 3.3 ± 17.0° for flexion-extension, 0.5 ± 17.0° for lateral flexion and -1.3 ± 24.6° for rotation. CONCLUSION: In general, the intra-rater reproducibility and the inter-rater reproducibility were good. We recommend to compare the reproducibility and clinical applicability of the EDI-320 inclinometer with other cervical ROM measures in symptomatic patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1343553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-13435532006-01-21 Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain Hoving, Jan Lucas Pool, Jan JM van Mameren, Henk Devillé, Walter JLM Assendelft, Willem JJ de Vet, Henrica CW de Winter, Andrea F Koes, Bart W Bouter, Lex M BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Reproducibility measurements of the range of motion are an important prerequisite for the interpretation of study results. The aim of the study is to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility of the measurement of active Range of Motion (ROM) in patients with neck pain using the Cybex Electronic Digital Inclinometer-320 (EDI-320). METHODS: In an outpatient clinic in a primary care setting 32 patients with at least 2 weeks of pain and/or stiffness in the neck were randomly assessed, in a test- retest design with blinded raters using a standardized measurement protocol. Cervical flexion-extension, lateral flexion and rotation were assessed. RESULTS: Reliability expressed by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was 0.93 (lateral flexion) or higher for intra-rater reliability and 0.89 (lateral flexion) or higher for inter-rater reliability. The 95% limits of agreement for intra-rater agreement, expressing the range of the differences between two ratings were -2.5 ± 11.1° for flexion-extension, -0.1 ± 10.4° for lateral flexion and -5.9 ± 13.5° for rotation. For inter-rater agreement the limits of agreement were 3.3 ± 17.0° for flexion-extension, 0.5 ± 17.0° for lateral flexion and -1.3 ± 24.6° for rotation. CONCLUSION: In general, the intra-rater reproducibility and the inter-rater reproducibility were good. We recommend to compare the reproducibility and clinical applicability of the EDI-320 inclinometer with other cervical ROM measures in symptomatic patients. BioMed Central 2005-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1343553/ /pubmed/16351719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-59 Text en Copyright © 2005 Hoving et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hoving, Jan Lucas Pool, Jan JM van Mameren, Henk Devillé, Walter JLM Assendelft, Willem JJ de Vet, Henrica CW de Winter, Andrea F Koes, Bart W Bouter, Lex M Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain |
title | Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain |
title_full | Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain |
title_short | Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain |
title_sort | reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1343553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16351719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-59 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hovingjanlucas reproducibilityofcervicalrangeofmotioninpatientswithneckpain AT pooljanjm reproducibilityofcervicalrangeofmotioninpatientswithneckpain AT vanmamerenhenk reproducibilityofcervicalrangeofmotioninpatientswithneckpain AT devillewalterjlm reproducibilityofcervicalrangeofmotioninpatientswithneckpain AT assendelftwillemjj reproducibilityofcervicalrangeofmotioninpatientswithneckpain AT devethenricacw reproducibilityofcervicalrangeofmotioninpatientswithneckpain AT dewinterandreaf reproducibilityofcervicalrangeofmotioninpatientswithneckpain AT koesbartw reproducibilityofcervicalrangeofmotioninpatientswithneckpain AT bouterlexm reproducibilityofcervicalrangeofmotioninpatientswithneckpain |