Cargando…

The MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN23494848]

BACKGROUND: The benefit of regular multidimensional assessment of older people remains controversial. The majority of trials have been too small to produce adequate evidence to inform policy. Despite the lack of a firm evidence base, UK primary care practitioners (general practitioners) are required...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fletcher, AE, Jones, DA, Bulpitt, CJ, Tulloch, AJ
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC134467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-2-21
_version_ 1782120398618361856
author Fletcher, AE
Jones, DA
Bulpitt, CJ
Tulloch, AJ
author_facet Fletcher, AE
Jones, DA
Bulpitt, CJ
Tulloch, AJ
author_sort Fletcher, AE
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The benefit of regular multidimensional assessment of older people remains controversial. The majority of trials have been too small to produce adequate evidence to inform policy. Despite the lack of a firm evidence base, UK primary care practitioners (general practitioners) are required to offer an annual health check to patients aged 75 years and over. DESIGN: Cluster-randomised factorial trial in primary care comparing a package of assessments (i) universal versus targeted assessment and (ii) management by the primary care team (PC) or a multidisciplinary geriatric assessment team (GM). The unit of randomization is the general practice. METHODS: Older people aged 75 and over eligible for the over 75s health check and excluding those in nursing homes or terminally ill were invited to participate. All participants receive a brief assessment covering all areas of the over 75s check. In the universal arm all participants also receive a detailed health and social assessment by a study nurse while in the targeted arm only participants with a pre-determined number and range of problems at the brief assessment go on to have the detailed assessment. The study nurse follows a standard protocol based on results and responses in the detailed assessment to make referrals to (i) the randomised management team (PC or GM) (ii) other medical services, health care workers or agencies (iii) emergency referrals to the GP. The main outcomes are mortality, hospital and institutional admissions and quality of life. 106 practices and 33,000 older people have been recruited to the trial.
format Text
id pubmed-134467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1344672002-11-20 The MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN23494848] Fletcher, AE Jones, DA Bulpitt, CJ Tulloch, AJ BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The benefit of regular multidimensional assessment of older people remains controversial. The majority of trials have been too small to produce adequate evidence to inform policy. Despite the lack of a firm evidence base, UK primary care practitioners (general practitioners) are required to offer an annual health check to patients aged 75 years and over. DESIGN: Cluster-randomised factorial trial in primary care comparing a package of assessments (i) universal versus targeted assessment and (ii) management by the primary care team (PC) or a multidisciplinary geriatric assessment team (GM). The unit of randomization is the general practice. METHODS: Older people aged 75 and over eligible for the over 75s health check and excluding those in nursing homes or terminally ill were invited to participate. All participants receive a brief assessment covering all areas of the over 75s check. In the universal arm all participants also receive a detailed health and social assessment by a study nurse while in the targeted arm only participants with a pre-determined number and range of problems at the brief assessment go on to have the detailed assessment. The study nurse follows a standard protocol based on results and responses in the detailed assessment to make referrals to (i) the randomised management team (PC or GM) (ii) other medical services, health care workers or agencies (iii) emergency referrals to the GP. The main outcomes are mortality, hospital and institutional admissions and quality of life. 106 practices and 33,000 older people have been recruited to the trial. BioMed Central 2002-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC134467/ /pubmed/12398790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-2-21 Text en Copyright © 2002 Fletcher et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Fletcher, AE
Jones, DA
Bulpitt, CJ
Tulloch, AJ
The MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN23494848]
title The MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN23494848]
title_full The MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN23494848]
title_fullStr The MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN23494848]
title_full_unstemmed The MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN23494848]
title_short The MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [ISRCTN23494848]
title_sort mrc trial of assessment and management of older people in the community: objectives, design and interventions [isrctn23494848]
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC134467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-2-21
work_keys_str_mv AT fletcherae themrctrialofassessmentandmanagementofolderpeopleinthecommunityobjectivesdesignandinterventionsisrctn23494848
AT jonesda themrctrialofassessmentandmanagementofolderpeopleinthecommunityobjectivesdesignandinterventionsisrctn23494848
AT bulpittcj themrctrialofassessmentandmanagementofolderpeopleinthecommunityobjectivesdesignandinterventionsisrctn23494848
AT tullochaj themrctrialofassessmentandmanagementofolderpeopleinthecommunityobjectivesdesignandinterventionsisrctn23494848
AT fletcherae mrctrialofassessmentandmanagementofolderpeopleinthecommunityobjectivesdesignandinterventionsisrctn23494848
AT jonesda mrctrialofassessmentandmanagementofolderpeopleinthecommunityobjectivesdesignandinterventionsisrctn23494848
AT bulpittcj mrctrialofassessmentandmanagementofolderpeopleinthecommunityobjectivesdesignandinterventionsisrctn23494848
AT tullochaj mrctrialofassessmentandmanagementofolderpeopleinthecommunityobjectivesdesignandinterventionsisrctn23494848