Cargando…
The prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Stillbirth rate is an important indicator of access to and quality of antenatal and delivery care. Obtaining overall estimates across various regions of the world is not straightforward due to variation in definitions, data collection methods and reporting. METHODS: We conducted a system...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1360064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16401351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-3-1 |
_version_ | 1782126683150614528 |
---|---|
author | Say, Lale Donner, Allan Gülmezoglu, A Metin Taljaard, Monica Piaggio, Gilda |
author_facet | Say, Lale Donner, Allan Gülmezoglu, A Metin Taljaard, Monica Piaggio, Gilda |
author_sort | Say, Lale |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stillbirth rate is an important indicator of access to and quality of antenatal and delivery care. Obtaining overall estimates across various regions of the world is not straightforward due to variation in definitions, data collection methods and reporting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of a range of pregnancy-related conditions including stillbirths and performed meta-analysis of the subset of studies reporting stillbirth rates. We examined variation across rates and used meta-regression techniques to explain observed variation. RESULTS: We identified 389 articles on stillbirth prevalence among the 2580 included in the systematic review. We included 70 providing 80 data sets from 50 countries in the meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence rates show variation across various subgroup categories. Rates per 100 births are higher in studies conducted in less developed country settings as compared to more developed (1.17 versus 0.50), of inadequate quality as compared to adequate (1.12 versus 0.66), using sub-national sample as compared to national (1.38 versus 0.68), reporting all stillbirths as compared to late stillbirths (0.95 versus 0.63), published in non-English as compared to English (0.91 versus 0.59) and as journal articles as compared to non-journal (1.37 versus 0.67). The results of the meta-regression show the significance of two predictor variables – development status of the setting and study quality – on stillbirth prevalence. CONCLUSION: Stillbirth prevalence at the community level is typically less than 1% in more developed parts of the world and could exceed 3% in less developed regions. Regular reviews of stillbirth rates in appropriately designed and reported studies are useful in monitoring the adequacy of care. Systematic reviews of prevalence studies are helpful in explaining sources of variation across rates. Exploring these methodological issues will lead to improved standards for assessing the burden of reproductive ill-health. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1360064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-13600642006-02-02 The prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review Say, Lale Donner, Allan Gülmezoglu, A Metin Taljaard, Monica Piaggio, Gilda Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Stillbirth rate is an important indicator of access to and quality of antenatal and delivery care. Obtaining overall estimates across various regions of the world is not straightforward due to variation in definitions, data collection methods and reporting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of a range of pregnancy-related conditions including stillbirths and performed meta-analysis of the subset of studies reporting stillbirth rates. We examined variation across rates and used meta-regression techniques to explain observed variation. RESULTS: We identified 389 articles on stillbirth prevalence among the 2580 included in the systematic review. We included 70 providing 80 data sets from 50 countries in the meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence rates show variation across various subgroup categories. Rates per 100 births are higher in studies conducted in less developed country settings as compared to more developed (1.17 versus 0.50), of inadequate quality as compared to adequate (1.12 versus 0.66), using sub-national sample as compared to national (1.38 versus 0.68), reporting all stillbirths as compared to late stillbirths (0.95 versus 0.63), published in non-English as compared to English (0.91 versus 0.59) and as journal articles as compared to non-journal (1.37 versus 0.67). The results of the meta-regression show the significance of two predictor variables – development status of the setting and study quality – on stillbirth prevalence. CONCLUSION: Stillbirth prevalence at the community level is typically less than 1% in more developed parts of the world and could exceed 3% in less developed regions. Regular reviews of stillbirth rates in appropriately designed and reported studies are useful in monitoring the adequacy of care. Systematic reviews of prevalence studies are helpful in explaining sources of variation across rates. Exploring these methodological issues will lead to improved standards for assessing the burden of reproductive ill-health. BioMed Central 2006-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1360064/ /pubmed/16401351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-3-1 Text en Copyright © 2006 Say et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Say, Lale Donner, Allan Gülmezoglu, A Metin Taljaard, Monica Piaggio, Gilda The prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review |
title | The prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review |
title_full | The prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review |
title_short | The prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review |
title_sort | prevalence of stillbirths: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1360064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16401351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-3-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saylale theprevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview AT donnerallan theprevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview AT gulmezogluametin theprevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview AT taljaardmonica theprevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview AT piaggiogilda theprevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview AT saylale prevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview AT donnerallan prevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview AT gulmezogluametin prevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview AT taljaardmonica prevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview AT piaggiogilda prevalenceofstillbirthsasystematicreview |