Cargando…
Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design?
The haplodiploid sex determining mechanism in Hymenoptera (males are haploid, females are diploid) has played an important role in the evolution of this insect order. In Hymenoptera sex is usually determined by a single locus, heterozygotes are female and hemizygotes are male. Under inbreeding, homo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1360072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16393347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-3-1 |
_version_ | 1782126685329555456 |
---|---|
author | van Wilgenburg, Ellen Driessen, Gerard Beukeboom, Leo W |
author_facet | van Wilgenburg, Ellen Driessen, Gerard Beukeboom, Leo W |
author_sort | van Wilgenburg, Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The haplodiploid sex determining mechanism in Hymenoptera (males are haploid, females are diploid) has played an important role in the evolution of this insect order. In Hymenoptera sex is usually determined by a single locus, heterozygotes are female and hemizygotes are male. Under inbreeding, homozygous diploid and sterile males occur which form a genetic burden for a population. We review life history and genetical traits that may overcome the disadvantages of single locus complementary sex determination (sl-CSD). Behavioural adaptations to avoid matings between relatives include active dispersal from natal patches and mating preferences for non-relatives. In non-social species, temporal and spatial segregation of male and female offspring reduces the burden of sl-CSD. In social species, diploid males are produced at the expense of workers and female reproductives. In some social species, diploid males and diploid male producing queens are killed by workers. Diploid male production may have played a role in the evolution or maintenance of polygyny (multiple queens) and polyandry (multiple mating). Some forms of thelytoky (parthenogenetic female production) increase homozygosity and are therefore incompatible with sl-CSD. We discuss a number of hypothetical adaptations to sl-CSD which should be considered in future studies of this insect order. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1360072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-13600722006-02-02 Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design? van Wilgenburg, Ellen Driessen, Gerard Beukeboom, Leo W Front Zool Review The haplodiploid sex determining mechanism in Hymenoptera (males are haploid, females are diploid) has played an important role in the evolution of this insect order. In Hymenoptera sex is usually determined by a single locus, heterozygotes are female and hemizygotes are male. Under inbreeding, homozygous diploid and sterile males occur which form a genetic burden for a population. We review life history and genetical traits that may overcome the disadvantages of single locus complementary sex determination (sl-CSD). Behavioural adaptations to avoid matings between relatives include active dispersal from natal patches and mating preferences for non-relatives. In non-social species, temporal and spatial segregation of male and female offspring reduces the burden of sl-CSD. In social species, diploid males are produced at the expense of workers and female reproductives. In some social species, diploid males and diploid male producing queens are killed by workers. Diploid male production may have played a role in the evolution or maintenance of polygyny (multiple queens) and polyandry (multiple mating). Some forms of thelytoky (parthenogenetic female production) increase homozygosity and are therefore incompatible with sl-CSD. We discuss a number of hypothetical adaptations to sl-CSD which should be considered in future studies of this insect order. BioMed Central 2006-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1360072/ /pubmed/16393347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-3-1 Text en Copyright © 2006 van Wilgenburg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review van Wilgenburg, Ellen Driessen, Gerard Beukeboom, Leo W Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design? |
title | Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design? |
title_full | Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design? |
title_fullStr | Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design? |
title_full_unstemmed | Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design? |
title_short | Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design? |
title_sort | single locus complementary sex determination in hymenoptera: an "unintelligent" design? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1360072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16393347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-3-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanwilgenburgellen singlelocuscomplementarysexdeterminationinhymenopteraanunintelligentdesign AT driessengerard singlelocuscomplementarysexdeterminationinhymenopteraanunintelligentdesign AT beukeboomleow singlelocuscomplementarysexdeterminationinhymenopteraanunintelligentdesign |