Cargando…

A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common problem and its most common etiology is peptic ulcer disease. Ulcer rebleeding is considered a perilous complication for patients. To reduce the rate of rebleeding and to fasten the improvement of patients' general conditions, most emergency dep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoshbaten, Manouchehr, Fattahi, Ebrahim, Naderi, Nosratollah, Khaleghian, Farzaneh, Rezailashkajani, Mohammadreza
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1360671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16403233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-6-2
_version_ 1782126704567779328
author Khoshbaten, Manouchehr
Fattahi, Ebrahim
Naderi, Nosratollah
Khaleghian, Farzaneh
Rezailashkajani, Mohammadreza
author_facet Khoshbaten, Manouchehr
Fattahi, Ebrahim
Naderi, Nosratollah
Khaleghian, Farzaneh
Rezailashkajani, Mohammadreza
author_sort Khoshbaten, Manouchehr
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common problem and its most common etiology is peptic ulcer disease. Ulcer rebleeding is considered a perilous complication for patients. To reduce the rate of rebleeding and to fasten the improvement of patients' general conditions, most emergency departments in Iran use H2-blockers before endoscopic procedures (i.e. intravenous omeprazole is not available in Iran). The aim of this study was to compare therapeutic effects of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine on reducing rebleeding rates, duration of hospitalization, and the need for blood transfusion in duodenal ulcer patients. METHODS: In this clinical trial, 80 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to duodenal peptic ulcer and endoscopic evidence of rebleeding referring to emergency departments of Imam and Sina hospitals in Tabriz, Iran were randomly assigned to two equal groups; one was treated with intravenous cimetidine 800 mg per day and the other, with 40 mg oral omeprazole per day. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between cimetidine and omeprazole groups in regards to sex, age, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, NSAID consumption, endoscopic evidence of rebleeding, mean hemoglobin and mean BUN levels on admission, duration of hospitalization and the mean time of rebleeding. However, the need for blood transfusion was much lower in omeprazole than in cimetidine group (mean: 1.68 versus 3.58 units, respectively; p < 0.003). Moreover, rebleeding rate was significantly lower in omeprazole group (15%) than in cimetidine group (50%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that oral omeprazole significantly excels intravenous cimetidine in reducing the need for blood transfusion and lowering rebleeding rates in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Though not statistically significant (p = 0.074), shorter periods of hospitalization were found for omeprazole group which merits consideration for cost minimization.
format Text
id pubmed-1360671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13606712006-02-04 A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer Khoshbaten, Manouchehr Fattahi, Ebrahim Naderi, Nosratollah Khaleghian, Farzaneh Rezailashkajani, Mohammadreza BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common problem and its most common etiology is peptic ulcer disease. Ulcer rebleeding is considered a perilous complication for patients. To reduce the rate of rebleeding and to fasten the improvement of patients' general conditions, most emergency departments in Iran use H2-blockers before endoscopic procedures (i.e. intravenous omeprazole is not available in Iran). The aim of this study was to compare therapeutic effects of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine on reducing rebleeding rates, duration of hospitalization, and the need for blood transfusion in duodenal ulcer patients. METHODS: In this clinical trial, 80 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to duodenal peptic ulcer and endoscopic evidence of rebleeding referring to emergency departments of Imam and Sina hospitals in Tabriz, Iran were randomly assigned to two equal groups; one was treated with intravenous cimetidine 800 mg per day and the other, with 40 mg oral omeprazole per day. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between cimetidine and omeprazole groups in regards to sex, age, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, NSAID consumption, endoscopic evidence of rebleeding, mean hemoglobin and mean BUN levels on admission, duration of hospitalization and the mean time of rebleeding. However, the need for blood transfusion was much lower in omeprazole than in cimetidine group (mean: 1.68 versus 3.58 units, respectively; p < 0.003). Moreover, rebleeding rate was significantly lower in omeprazole group (15%) than in cimetidine group (50%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that oral omeprazole significantly excels intravenous cimetidine in reducing the need for blood transfusion and lowering rebleeding rates in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Though not statistically significant (p = 0.074), shorter periods of hospitalization were found for omeprazole group which merits consideration for cost minimization. BioMed Central 2006-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1360671/ /pubmed/16403233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-6-2 Text en Copyright © 2006 Khoshbaten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khoshbaten, Manouchehr
Fattahi, Ebrahim
Naderi, Nosratollah
Khaleghian, Farzaneh
Rezailashkajani, Mohammadreza
A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer
title A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer
title_full A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer
title_fullStr A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer
title_short A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer
title_sort comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1360671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16403233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-6-2
work_keys_str_mv AT khoshbatenmanouchehr acomparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer
AT fattahiebrahim acomparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer
AT naderinosratollah acomparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer
AT khaleghianfarzaneh acomparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer
AT rezailashkajanimohammadreza acomparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer
AT khoshbatenmanouchehr comparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer
AT fattahiebrahim comparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer
AT naderinosratollah comparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer
AT khaleghianfarzaneh comparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer
AT rezailashkajanimohammadreza comparisonoforalomeprazoleandintravenouscimetidineinreducingcomplicationsofduodenalpepticulcer