Cargando…

Percutaneous tracheostomy

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) has gained an increasing acceptance as an alternative to the conventional surgical tracheostomy (ST). In experienced hands, and with proper patient selection, it is safe, easy and quick. COMPLICATIONS: Perioperative complications are comparable with those o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Petros, Sirak
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11094476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc340
_version_ 1782120408901746688
author Petros, Sirak
author_facet Petros, Sirak
author_sort Petros, Sirak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) has gained an increasing acceptance as an alternative to the conventional surgical tracheostomy (ST). In experienced hands, and with proper patient selection, it is safe, easy and quick. COMPLICATIONS: Perioperative complications are comparable with those of ST and these are mostly minor. An important advantage of PT over ST is that there is no need to move a critically ill patient to the operating room and the rate of stomal infection is very low. Although data on late complications of PT are not yet sufficient, available reports show a favourable result. TECHNIQUES: Ciaglia's method is the most commonly applied, but no study has shown superiority of any of the percutaneous techniques described. The decision on which method to use should solely be made depending on the clinical situation and the experience of the operator. The learning curve demands caution, attention to detail and adequate experience on the part of the intensive care physician. Although PT is unfortunately declared 'easy', it must be left in the hands of experienced physicians to avoid unnecessary complications, and the risk of overimplementation should be kept in mind.
format Text
id pubmed-137226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1372262003-02-27 Percutaneous tracheostomy Petros, Sirak Crit Care Review BACKGROUND: Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) has gained an increasing acceptance as an alternative to the conventional surgical tracheostomy (ST). In experienced hands, and with proper patient selection, it is safe, easy and quick. COMPLICATIONS: Perioperative complications are comparable with those of ST and these are mostly minor. An important advantage of PT over ST is that there is no need to move a critically ill patient to the operating room and the rate of stomal infection is very low. Although data on late complications of PT are not yet sufficient, available reports show a favourable result. TECHNIQUES: Ciaglia's method is the most commonly applied, but no study has shown superiority of any of the percutaneous techniques described. The decision on which method to use should solely be made depending on the clinical situation and the experience of the operator. The learning curve demands caution, attention to detail and adequate experience on the part of the intensive care physician. Although PT is unfortunately declared 'easy', it must be left in the hands of experienced physicians to avoid unnecessary complications, and the risk of overimplementation should be kept in mind. BioMed Central 1999 1999-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC137226/ /pubmed/11094476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc340 Text en Copyright © 1999 Current Science Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Petros, Sirak
Percutaneous tracheostomy
title Percutaneous tracheostomy
title_full Percutaneous tracheostomy
title_fullStr Percutaneous tracheostomy
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous tracheostomy
title_short Percutaneous tracheostomy
title_sort percutaneous tracheostomy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11094476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc340
work_keys_str_mv AT petrossirak percutaneoustracheostomy