Cargando…

The measurement of lung water

INTRODUCTION: In this review, we compare the spectrum of currently available methods for quantifying pulmonary edema in patients. REVIEW: Imaging and indicator dilution techniques comprise the most common strategies for measuring lung water at the bedside. The most accurate (within 10% of the gravim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lange, Neale R, Schuster, Daniel P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11094478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc342
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: In this review, we compare the spectrum of currently available methods for quantifying pulmonary edema in patients. REVIEW: Imaging and indicator dilution techniques comprise the most common strategies for measuring lung water at the bedside. The most accurate (within 10% of the gravimetric gold standard) and most reproducible (< 5% between-test variation) are also, unfortunately, the most expensive and most difficult to implement for purposes of large-scale clinical trials or for routine clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The standard chest radiograph remains the best screening test for the detection of pulmonary edema. Indicator-dilution techniques are probably the best available method at present for quantitation in patient groups.