Cargando…
Evaluating our end-of-life practice
Ferrand et al's recent study of witholding and withdrawing life support in intensive care units in France reminds us that reporting end-of-life practices is an important step towards enhancing end-of-life care. The study highlights differences between the parentalistic approach to decision maki...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11511329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1020 |
_version_ | 1782120420654186496 |
---|---|
author | Levy, Mitchell M |
author_facet | Levy, Mitchell M |
author_sort | Levy, Mitchell M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ferrand et al's recent study of witholding and withdrawing life support in intensive care units in France reminds us that reporting end-of-life practices is an important step towards enhancing end-of-life care. The study highlights differences between the parentalistic approach to decision making in Europe, and the patient autonomy model in the USA. However, the reasons intensivists report for witholding or withdrawing life support are similar in both cultures. Intensivists in France make decisions despite a lack of formal guidelines in their country. This study should serve as a stimulus for educating the public and motivating more groups to monitor their end-of-life practices. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-137276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1372762003-02-27 Evaluating our end-of-life practice Levy, Mitchell M Crit Care Commentary Ferrand et al's recent study of witholding and withdrawing life support in intensive care units in France reminds us that reporting end-of-life practices is an important step towards enhancing end-of-life care. The study highlights differences between the parentalistic approach to decision making in Europe, and the patient autonomy model in the USA. However, the reasons intensivists report for witholding or withdrawing life support are similar in both cultures. Intensivists in France make decisions despite a lack of formal guidelines in their country. This study should serve as a stimulus for educating the public and motivating more groups to monitor their end-of-life practices. BioMed Central 2001 2001-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC137276/ /pubmed/11511329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1020 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Levy, Mitchell M Evaluating our end-of-life practice |
title | Evaluating our end-of-life practice |
title_full | Evaluating our end-of-life practice |
title_fullStr | Evaluating our end-of-life practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating our end-of-life practice |
title_short | Evaluating our end-of-life practice |
title_sort | evaluating our end-of-life practice |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11511329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levymitchellm evaluatingourendoflifepractice |