Cargando…

Evaluating our end-of-life practice

Ferrand et al's recent study of witholding and withdrawing life support in intensive care units in France reminds us that reporting end-of-life practices is an important step towards enhancing end-of-life care. The study highlights differences between the parentalistic approach to decision maki...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Levy, Mitchell M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11511329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1020
_version_ 1782120420654186496
author Levy, Mitchell M
author_facet Levy, Mitchell M
author_sort Levy, Mitchell M
collection PubMed
description Ferrand et al's recent study of witholding and withdrawing life support in intensive care units in France reminds us that reporting end-of-life practices is an important step towards enhancing end-of-life care. The study highlights differences between the parentalistic approach to decision making in Europe, and the patient autonomy model in the USA. However, the reasons intensivists report for witholding or withdrawing life support are similar in both cultures. Intensivists in France make decisions despite a lack of formal guidelines in their country. This study should serve as a stimulus for educating the public and motivating more groups to monitor their end-of-life practices.
format Text
id pubmed-137276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1372762003-02-27 Evaluating our end-of-life practice Levy, Mitchell M Crit Care Commentary Ferrand et al's recent study of witholding and withdrawing life support in intensive care units in France reminds us that reporting end-of-life practices is an important step towards enhancing end-of-life care. The study highlights differences between the parentalistic approach to decision making in Europe, and the patient autonomy model in the USA. However, the reasons intensivists report for witholding or withdrawing life support are similar in both cultures. Intensivists in France make decisions despite a lack of formal guidelines in their country. This study should serve as a stimulus for educating the public and motivating more groups to monitor their end-of-life practices. BioMed Central 2001 2001-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC137276/ /pubmed/11511329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1020 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Levy, Mitchell M
Evaluating our end-of-life practice
title Evaluating our end-of-life practice
title_full Evaluating our end-of-life practice
title_fullStr Evaluating our end-of-life practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating our end-of-life practice
title_short Evaluating our end-of-life practice
title_sort evaluating our end-of-life practice
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11511329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1020
work_keys_str_mv AT levymitchellm evaluatingourendoflifepractice