Cargando…
Pro/con clinical debate: Are steroids useful in the management of patients with septic shock?
Decision-making in the intensive care unit is often very difficult. Although we are encouraged to make evidence-based decisions, this may be difficult for a number of reasons. To begin with, evidence may not exist to answer the clinical question. Second, when there is evidence it may not be applicab...
Autores principales: | Ritacca, Frank V, Simone, Carmine, Wax, Randy, Craig, Katherine G, Walley, Keith R |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11983034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1467 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Pro/con clinical debate: Is high-volume hemofiltration beneficial in the treatment of septic shock?
por: Reiter, Karl, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
Pro/con clinical debate: Hydroxyethylstarches should be avoided in septic patients
por: Schortgen, Frédérique, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Pro-Con Debate: Steroid use in ACTH non-responsive septic shock patients with high baseline cortisol levels
por: Annane, Djillali, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Pro/con debate: Should synthetic colloids be used in patients with septic shock?
por: Downar, James, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Pro/con ethics debate: is nonheart-beating organ donation ethically acceptable?
por: Whetstine, Leslie, et al.
Publicado: (2002)