Cargando…
Pro/con clinical debate: do colloids have advantages over crystalloids in paediatric sepsis?
Despite decades of resuscitating patients with intravenous fluids in intensive care units, it is somewhat surprising that very little consensus exists regarding the type of fluid physicians should choose. Factors that influence decisions are often local culture or politics, hospital administrators,...
Autores principales: | Khandelwal, Puran, Bohn, Desmond, Carcillo, Joseph A, Thomas, Neal J |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12225598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1510 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Pro/con debate: Should synthetic colloids be used in patients with septic shock?
por: Downar, James, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Crystalloid and Colloid Compositions and Their Impact
por: Rudloff, Elke, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Does procalcitonin have clinical utility in the management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia? A PRO/CON debate
por: Chiotos, Kathleen, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Erratum: Crystalloid and Colloid Compositions and Their Impact
por: Frontiers Production Office,
Publicado: (2022) -
Fluid therapy change from synthetic colloids to only crystalloids in patients with severe sepsis
por: Bayer, O, et al.
Publicado: (2010)