Cargando…

Weekly induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgical cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: Traditional intraperitoneal (IP) therapy administered simultaneously with intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in the primary setting has been well documented. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the role of weekly IP therapy as an inducing intervention before front-line IV ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu Zang, Rong, Li, Zi Ting, Tang, Jie, Huang, Xiao, Mo Cai, Shu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1373630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16423287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-4-4
_version_ 1782126803131826176
author Yu Zang, Rong
Li, Zi Ting
Tang, Jie
Huang, Xiao
Mo Cai, Shu
author_facet Yu Zang, Rong
Li, Zi Ting
Tang, Jie
Huang, Xiao
Mo Cai, Shu
author_sort Yu Zang, Rong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional intraperitoneal (IP) therapy administered simultaneously with intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in the primary setting has been well documented. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the role of weekly IP therapy as an inducing intervention before front-line IV chemotherapy, particularly in patients with bulky residual disease after surgery. METHODS: A total of 426 patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated between 1990 and 1999, were reviewed. Follow-up data were available in 409 patients. Of whom, 230 patients received postoperative weekly IP therapy with a median cycles of 4, other 179 patients who did not receive any IP therapy were used as the control group. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 51 years (range, 20–77 years). One hundred eighty-nine patients with stage III disease and 41 patients with stage IV disease were treated with postoperative IP therapy, respectively. Complications and toxicity were observed in 68 patients (29.5%), but there were no grade 4 toxicities and no patients died of complications or toxicities. In patients with residual disease > 1 cm, the median survival of those with IP delivery of chemotherapy and those without was 21.6 months and 18.8 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]= 0.69, P = 0.02). Whereas, in patients with residual disease ≤ 1 cm, the median survival was 46.8 months and 37.6 months, respectively (HR= 0.73, P = 0.09). Multivariate analysis suggested that the factors age ≤ 60 years, stage III, IP therapy and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy were associated with a better prognosis for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: Weekly postoperative IP therapy as an inducing intervention is practical for both physicians and patients with acceptable complications and associated with a lengthened survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Whether this arm can be used in lieu of a traditional one needs further randomized trial to confirm the preliminary results.
format Text
id pubmed-1373630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13736302006-02-18 Weekly induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgical cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer Yu Zang, Rong Li, Zi Ting Tang, Jie Huang, Xiao Mo Cai, Shu World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Traditional intraperitoneal (IP) therapy administered simultaneously with intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in the primary setting has been well documented. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the role of weekly IP therapy as an inducing intervention before front-line IV chemotherapy, particularly in patients with bulky residual disease after surgery. METHODS: A total of 426 patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated between 1990 and 1999, were reviewed. Follow-up data were available in 409 patients. Of whom, 230 patients received postoperative weekly IP therapy with a median cycles of 4, other 179 patients who did not receive any IP therapy were used as the control group. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 51 years (range, 20–77 years). One hundred eighty-nine patients with stage III disease and 41 patients with stage IV disease were treated with postoperative IP therapy, respectively. Complications and toxicity were observed in 68 patients (29.5%), but there were no grade 4 toxicities and no patients died of complications or toxicities. In patients with residual disease > 1 cm, the median survival of those with IP delivery of chemotherapy and those without was 21.6 months and 18.8 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]= 0.69, P = 0.02). Whereas, in patients with residual disease ≤ 1 cm, the median survival was 46.8 months and 37.6 months, respectively (HR= 0.73, P = 0.09). Multivariate analysis suggested that the factors age ≤ 60 years, stage III, IP therapy and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy were associated with a better prognosis for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: Weekly postoperative IP therapy as an inducing intervention is practical for both physicians and patients with acceptable complications and associated with a lengthened survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Whether this arm can be used in lieu of a traditional one needs further randomized trial to confirm the preliminary results. BioMed Central 2006-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1373630/ /pubmed/16423287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-4-4 Text en Copyright © 2006 Yu Zang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Yu Zang, Rong
Li, Zi Ting
Tang, Jie
Huang, Xiao
Mo Cai, Shu
Weekly induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgical cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
title Weekly induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgical cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
title_full Weekly induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgical cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Weekly induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgical cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Weekly induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgical cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
title_short Weekly induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgical cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
title_sort weekly induction intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgical cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1373630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16423287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-4-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yuzangrong weeklyinductionintraperitonealchemotherapyafterprimarysurgicalcytoreductioninpatientswithadvancedepithelialovariancancer
AT liziting weeklyinductionintraperitonealchemotherapyafterprimarysurgicalcytoreductioninpatientswithadvancedepithelialovariancancer
AT tangjie weeklyinductionintraperitonealchemotherapyafterprimarysurgicalcytoreductioninpatientswithadvancedepithelialovariancancer
AT huangxiao weeklyinductionintraperitonealchemotherapyafterprimarysurgicalcytoreductioninpatientswithadvancedepithelialovariancancer
AT mocaishu weeklyinductionintraperitonealchemotherapyafterprimarysurgicalcytoreductioninpatientswithadvancedepithelialovariancancer