Cargando…

Diagnostic role of new Doppler index in assessment of renal artery stenosis

BACKGROUND: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is one of the main causes of secondary systemic arterial hypertension. Several non-invasive diagnostic methods for RAS have been used in hypertensive patients, such as color Doppler ultrasound (US). The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chain, Sergio, Luciardi, Hector, Feldman, Gabriela, Berman, Sofia, Herrera, Ramón N, Ochoa, Javier, Muntaner, Juan, Escudero, Eduardo M, Ronderos, Ricardo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1373647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16436206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-4-4
_version_ 1782126807234904064
author Chain, Sergio
Luciardi, Hector
Feldman, Gabriela
Berman, Sofia
Herrera, Ramón N
Ochoa, Javier
Muntaner, Juan
Escudero, Eduardo M
Ronderos, Ricardo
author_facet Chain, Sergio
Luciardi, Hector
Feldman, Gabriela
Berman, Sofia
Herrera, Ramón N
Ochoa, Javier
Muntaner, Juan
Escudero, Eduardo M
Ronderos, Ricardo
author_sort Chain, Sergio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is one of the main causes of secondary systemic arterial hypertension. Several non-invasive diagnostic methods for RAS have been used in hypertensive patients, such as color Doppler ultrasound (US). The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a new renal Doppler US direct-method parameter: the renal-renal ratio (RRR), and compare with the sensitivity and specificity of direct-method conventional parameters: renal peak systolic velocity (RPSV) and renal aortic ratio (RAR), for the diagnosis of severe RAS. METHODS: Our study group included 34 patients with severe arterial hypertension (21 males and 13 females), mean age 54 (± 8.92) years old consecutively evaluated by renal color Doppler ultrasound (US) for significant RAS diagnosis. All of them underwent digital subtraction arteriography (DSA). RAS was significant if a diameter reduction > 50% was found. The parameters measured were: RPSV, RAR and RRR. The RRR was defined as the ratio between RPSV at the proximal or mid segment of the renal artery and RPSV measured at the distal segment of the renal artery. The sensitivity and specificity cutoff for the new RRR was calculated and compared with the sensitivity and specificity of RPSV and RAR. RESULTS: The accuracy of the direct method parameters for significant RAS were: RPSV >200 cm/s with 97% sensitivity, 72% specificity, 81% positive predictive value and 95% negative predictive value; RAR >3 with 77% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 90% positive predictive value and 76% negative predictive value. The optimal sensitivity and specificity cutoff for the new RRR was >2.7 with 97% sensitivity (p < 0.004) and 96% specificity (p < 0.02), with 97% positive predictive value and 97% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: The new RRR has improved specificity compared with the direct method conventional parameters (RPSV >200cm/s and RAR >3). Both RRR and RPSV show better sensitivity than RAR for the RAS diagnosis.
format Text
id pubmed-1373647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13736472006-02-18 Diagnostic role of new Doppler index in assessment of renal artery stenosis Chain, Sergio Luciardi, Hector Feldman, Gabriela Berman, Sofia Herrera, Ramón N Ochoa, Javier Muntaner, Juan Escudero, Eduardo M Ronderos, Ricardo Cardiovasc Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is one of the main causes of secondary systemic arterial hypertension. Several non-invasive diagnostic methods for RAS have been used in hypertensive patients, such as color Doppler ultrasound (US). The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a new renal Doppler US direct-method parameter: the renal-renal ratio (RRR), and compare with the sensitivity and specificity of direct-method conventional parameters: renal peak systolic velocity (RPSV) and renal aortic ratio (RAR), for the diagnosis of severe RAS. METHODS: Our study group included 34 patients with severe arterial hypertension (21 males and 13 females), mean age 54 (± 8.92) years old consecutively evaluated by renal color Doppler ultrasound (US) for significant RAS diagnosis. All of them underwent digital subtraction arteriography (DSA). RAS was significant if a diameter reduction > 50% was found. The parameters measured were: RPSV, RAR and RRR. The RRR was defined as the ratio between RPSV at the proximal or mid segment of the renal artery and RPSV measured at the distal segment of the renal artery. The sensitivity and specificity cutoff for the new RRR was calculated and compared with the sensitivity and specificity of RPSV and RAR. RESULTS: The accuracy of the direct method parameters for significant RAS were: RPSV >200 cm/s with 97% sensitivity, 72% specificity, 81% positive predictive value and 95% negative predictive value; RAR >3 with 77% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 90% positive predictive value and 76% negative predictive value. The optimal sensitivity and specificity cutoff for the new RRR was >2.7 with 97% sensitivity (p < 0.004) and 96% specificity (p < 0.02), with 97% positive predictive value and 97% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION: The new RRR has improved specificity compared with the direct method conventional parameters (RPSV >200cm/s and RAR >3). Both RRR and RPSV show better sensitivity than RAR for the RAS diagnosis. BioMed Central 2006-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1373647/ /pubmed/16436206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-4-4 Text en Copyright © 2006 Chain et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chain, Sergio
Luciardi, Hector
Feldman, Gabriela
Berman, Sofia
Herrera, Ramón N
Ochoa, Javier
Muntaner, Juan
Escudero, Eduardo M
Ronderos, Ricardo
Diagnostic role of new Doppler index in assessment of renal artery stenosis
title Diagnostic role of new Doppler index in assessment of renal artery stenosis
title_full Diagnostic role of new Doppler index in assessment of renal artery stenosis
title_fullStr Diagnostic role of new Doppler index in assessment of renal artery stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic role of new Doppler index in assessment of renal artery stenosis
title_short Diagnostic role of new Doppler index in assessment of renal artery stenosis
title_sort diagnostic role of new doppler index in assessment of renal artery stenosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1373647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16436206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-4-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chainsergio diagnosticroleofnewdopplerindexinassessmentofrenalarterystenosis
AT luciardihector diagnosticroleofnewdopplerindexinassessmentofrenalarterystenosis
AT feldmangabriela diagnosticroleofnewdopplerindexinassessmentofrenalarterystenosis
AT bermansofia diagnosticroleofnewdopplerindexinassessmentofrenalarterystenosis
AT herreraramonn diagnosticroleofnewdopplerindexinassessmentofrenalarterystenosis
AT ochoajavier diagnosticroleofnewdopplerindexinassessmentofrenalarterystenosis
AT muntanerjuan diagnosticroleofnewdopplerindexinassessmentofrenalarterystenosis
AT escuderoeduardom diagnosticroleofnewdopplerindexinassessmentofrenalarterystenosis
AT ronderosricardo diagnosticroleofnewdopplerindexinassessmentofrenalarterystenosis