Cargando…

Venous thromboembolism deserves your attention

The survey of how Canadian intensive care units (ICUs) prevent and diagnose venous thromboembolism (VTE) presented in this issue of Critical Care illustrates considerable variability. Lack of optimal patient care reflects how VTE is rated in ICUs. The discussion should no longer focus on the inciden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Marc Samama, Charles
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11737903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1046
_version_ 1782120434603393024
author Marc Samama, Charles
author_facet Marc Samama, Charles
author_sort Marc Samama, Charles
collection PubMed
description The survey of how Canadian intensive care units (ICUs) prevent and diagnose venous thromboembolism (VTE) presented in this issue of Critical Care illustrates considerable variability. Lack of optimal patient care reflects how VTE is rated in ICUs. The discussion should no longer focus on the incidence of thrombosis, but rather on its prevention. Unfractionated heparin remains the most commonly used agent to prevent VTE, despite the recognized efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the ICU setting. In addition, too few ICU directors consider the use of mechanical prophylactic measures, such as graded elastic stockings and venous foot pump. The present situation calls for large randomized controlled trials in either medical or surgical ICU patients, and for new education programmes in order to modify the care of ICU patients with regard to VTE.
format Text
id pubmed-137365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1373652003-02-27 Venous thromboembolism deserves your attention Marc Samama, Charles Crit Care Commentary The survey of how Canadian intensive care units (ICUs) prevent and diagnose venous thromboembolism (VTE) presented in this issue of Critical Care illustrates considerable variability. Lack of optimal patient care reflects how VTE is rated in ICUs. The discussion should no longer focus on the incidence of thrombosis, but rather on its prevention. Unfractionated heparin remains the most commonly used agent to prevent VTE, despite the recognized efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the ICU setting. In addition, too few ICU directors consider the use of mechanical prophylactic measures, such as graded elastic stockings and venous foot pump. The present situation calls for large randomized controlled trials in either medical or surgical ICU patients, and for new education programmes in order to modify the care of ICU patients with regard to VTE. BioMed Central 2001 2001-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC137365/ /pubmed/11737903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1046 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Marc Samama, Charles
Venous thromboembolism deserves your attention
title Venous thromboembolism deserves your attention
title_full Venous thromboembolism deserves your attention
title_fullStr Venous thromboembolism deserves your attention
title_full_unstemmed Venous thromboembolism deserves your attention
title_short Venous thromboembolism deserves your attention
title_sort venous thromboembolism deserves your attention
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11737903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1046
work_keys_str_mv AT marcsamamacharles venousthromboembolismdeservesyourattention