Cargando…

CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research?

Previously, we reviewed the evidence for the efficacy of CAM approaches for pediatric pain (volume 2; issue 2; 2005) using criteria developed by the American Psychological Association Division 12 Task Force. Our review focused on CAM modalities that had been tested with at least one controlled trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tsao, Jennie C. I.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1375226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16550236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nek003
_version_ 1782126815872024576
author Tsao, Jennie C. I.
author_facet Tsao, Jennie C. I.
author_sort Tsao, Jennie C. I.
collection PubMed
description Previously, we reviewed the evidence for the efficacy of CAM approaches for pediatric pain (volume 2; issue 2; 2005) using criteria developed by the American Psychological Association Division 12 Task Force. Our review focused on CAM modalities that had been tested with at least one controlled trial or multiple baseline study. In addition, only those trials in which children comprised the study sample were included. Thus, several CAM modalities were not included in our review. Key ethical and other reasons for the limited literature on CAM for pediatric pain as well as directions for future studies are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-1375226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13752262006-03-20 CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research? Tsao, Jennie C. I. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Commentary Previously, we reviewed the evidence for the efficacy of CAM approaches for pediatric pain (volume 2; issue 2; 2005) using criteria developed by the American Psychological Association Division 12 Task Force. Our review focused on CAM modalities that had been tested with at least one controlled trial or multiple baseline study. In addition, only those trials in which children comprised the study sample were included. Thus, several CAM modalities were not included in our review. Key ethical and other reasons for the limited literature on CAM for pediatric pain as well as directions for future studies are discussed. Oxford University Press 2006-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1375226/ /pubmed/16550236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nek003 Text en © The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved
spellingShingle Commentary
Tsao, Jennie C. I.
CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research?
title CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research?
title_full CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research?
title_fullStr CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research?
title_full_unstemmed CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research?
title_short CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research?
title_sort cam for pediatric pain: what is state-of-the-research?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1375226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16550236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nek003
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaojennieci camforpediatricpainwhatisstateoftheresearch