Cargando…
CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research?
Previously, we reviewed the evidence for the efficacy of CAM approaches for pediatric pain (volume 2; issue 2; 2005) using criteria developed by the American Psychological Association Division 12 Task Force. Our review focused on CAM modalities that had been tested with at least one controlled trial...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1375226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16550236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nek003 |
_version_ | 1782126815872024576 |
---|---|
author | Tsao, Jennie C. I. |
author_facet | Tsao, Jennie C. I. |
author_sort | Tsao, Jennie C. I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previously, we reviewed the evidence for the efficacy of CAM approaches for pediatric pain (volume 2; issue 2; 2005) using criteria developed by the American Psychological Association Division 12 Task Force. Our review focused on CAM modalities that had been tested with at least one controlled trial or multiple baseline study. In addition, only those trials in which children comprised the study sample were included. Thus, several CAM modalities were not included in our review. Key ethical and other reasons for the limited literature on CAM for pediatric pain as well as directions for future studies are discussed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1375226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-13752262006-03-20 CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research? Tsao, Jennie C. I. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Commentary Previously, we reviewed the evidence for the efficacy of CAM approaches for pediatric pain (volume 2; issue 2; 2005) using criteria developed by the American Psychological Association Division 12 Task Force. Our review focused on CAM modalities that had been tested with at least one controlled trial or multiple baseline study. In addition, only those trials in which children comprised the study sample were included. Thus, several CAM modalities were not included in our review. Key ethical and other reasons for the limited literature on CAM for pediatric pain as well as directions for future studies are discussed. Oxford University Press 2006-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1375226/ /pubmed/16550236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nek003 Text en © The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved |
spellingShingle | Commentary Tsao, Jennie C. I. CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research? |
title | CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research? |
title_full | CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research? |
title_fullStr | CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research? |
title_full_unstemmed | CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research? |
title_short | CAM for Pediatric Pain: What is State-of-the-Research? |
title_sort | cam for pediatric pain: what is state-of-the-research? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1375226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16550236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nek003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsaojennieci camforpediatricpainwhatisstateoftheresearch |