Cargando…
Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice
BACKGROUND: Most data on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing come from urologic cohorts comprised of volunteers for screening programs. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PSA testing for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. METHODS: PSA testing results were compared with a refer...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-19 |
_version_ | 1782120454086983680 |
---|---|
author | Hoffman, Richard M Gilliland, Frank D Adams-Cameron, Meg Hunt, William C Key, Charles R |
author_facet | Hoffman, Richard M Gilliland, Frank D Adams-Cameron, Meg Hunt, William C Key, Charles R |
author_sort | Hoffman, Richard M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most data on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing come from urologic cohorts comprised of volunteers for screening programs. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PSA testing for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. METHODS: PSA testing results were compared with a reference standard of prostate biopsy. Subjects were 2,620 men 40 years and older undergoing (PSA) testing and biopsy from 1/1/95 through 12/31/98 in the Albuquerque, New Mexico metropolitan area. Diagnostic measures included the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 930 subjects (35%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.67 and the PSA cutpoint of 4 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 33%. The likelihood ratio for a positive test (LR+) was 1.28 and 0.42 for a negative test (LR-). PSA testing was most sensitive (90%) but least specific (27%) in older men. Age-specific reference ranges improved specificity in older men (49%) but decreased sensitivity (70%), with an LR+ of 1.38. Lowering the PSA cutpoint to 2 ng/ml resulted in a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 20%, and an LR+ of 1.19. CONCLUSIONS: PSA testing had fair discriminating power for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. The PSA cutpoint of 4 ng/ml was sensitive but relatively non-specific and associated likelihood ratios only moderately revised probabilities for cancer. Using age-specific reference ranges and a PSA cutpoint below 4 ng/ml improved test specificity and sensitivity, respectively, but did not improve the overall accuracy of PSA testing. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-137591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1375912002-12-08 Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice Hoffman, Richard M Gilliland, Frank D Adams-Cameron, Meg Hunt, William C Key, Charles R BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Most data on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing come from urologic cohorts comprised of volunteers for screening programs. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PSA testing for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. METHODS: PSA testing results were compared with a reference standard of prostate biopsy. Subjects were 2,620 men 40 years and older undergoing (PSA) testing and biopsy from 1/1/95 through 12/31/98 in the Albuquerque, New Mexico metropolitan area. Diagnostic measures included the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 930 subjects (35%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.67 and the PSA cutpoint of 4 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 33%. The likelihood ratio for a positive test (LR+) was 1.28 and 0.42 for a negative test (LR-). PSA testing was most sensitive (90%) but least specific (27%) in older men. Age-specific reference ranges improved specificity in older men (49%) but decreased sensitivity (70%), with an LR+ of 1.38. Lowering the PSA cutpoint to 2 ng/ml resulted in a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 20%, and an LR+ of 1.19. CONCLUSIONS: PSA testing had fair discriminating power for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. The PSA cutpoint of 4 ng/ml was sensitive but relatively non-specific and associated likelihood ratios only moderately revised probabilities for cancer. Using age-specific reference ranges and a PSA cutpoint below 4 ng/ml improved test specificity and sensitivity, respectively, but did not improve the overall accuracy of PSA testing. BioMed Central 2002-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC137591/ /pubmed/12398793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-19 Text en Copyright © 2002 Hoffman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hoffman, Richard M Gilliland, Frank D Adams-Cameron, Meg Hunt, William C Key, Charles R Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice |
title | Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice |
title_full | Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice |
title_fullStr | Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice |
title_short | Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice |
title_sort | prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoffmanrichardm prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice AT gillilandfrankd prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice AT adamscameronmeg prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice AT huntwilliamc prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice AT keycharlesr prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice |