Cargando…

Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice

BACKGROUND: Most data on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing come from urologic cohorts comprised of volunteers for screening programs. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PSA testing for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. METHODS: PSA testing results were compared with a refer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffman, Richard M, Gilliland, Frank D, Adams-Cameron, Meg, Hunt, William C, Key, Charles R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-19
_version_ 1782120454086983680
author Hoffman, Richard M
Gilliland, Frank D
Adams-Cameron, Meg
Hunt, William C
Key, Charles R
author_facet Hoffman, Richard M
Gilliland, Frank D
Adams-Cameron, Meg
Hunt, William C
Key, Charles R
author_sort Hoffman, Richard M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most data on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing come from urologic cohorts comprised of volunteers for screening programs. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PSA testing for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. METHODS: PSA testing results were compared with a reference standard of prostate biopsy. Subjects were 2,620 men 40 years and older undergoing (PSA) testing and biopsy from 1/1/95 through 12/31/98 in the Albuquerque, New Mexico metropolitan area. Diagnostic measures included the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 930 subjects (35%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.67 and the PSA cutpoint of 4 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 33%. The likelihood ratio for a positive test (LR+) was 1.28 and 0.42 for a negative test (LR-). PSA testing was most sensitive (90%) but least specific (27%) in older men. Age-specific reference ranges improved specificity in older men (49%) but decreased sensitivity (70%), with an LR+ of 1.38. Lowering the PSA cutpoint to 2 ng/ml resulted in a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 20%, and an LR+ of 1.19. CONCLUSIONS: PSA testing had fair discriminating power for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. The PSA cutpoint of 4 ng/ml was sensitive but relatively non-specific and associated likelihood ratios only moderately revised probabilities for cancer. Using age-specific reference ranges and a PSA cutpoint below 4 ng/ml improved test specificity and sensitivity, respectively, but did not improve the overall accuracy of PSA testing.
format Text
id pubmed-137591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1375912002-12-08 Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice Hoffman, Richard M Gilliland, Frank D Adams-Cameron, Meg Hunt, William C Key, Charles R BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Most data on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing come from urologic cohorts comprised of volunteers for screening programs. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PSA testing for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. METHODS: PSA testing results were compared with a reference standard of prostate biopsy. Subjects were 2,620 men 40 years and older undergoing (PSA) testing and biopsy from 1/1/95 through 12/31/98 in the Albuquerque, New Mexico metropolitan area. Diagnostic measures included the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 930 subjects (35%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.67 and the PSA cutpoint of 4 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 33%. The likelihood ratio for a positive test (LR+) was 1.28 and 0.42 for a negative test (LR-). PSA testing was most sensitive (90%) but least specific (27%) in older men. Age-specific reference ranges improved specificity in older men (49%) but decreased sensitivity (70%), with an LR+ of 1.38. Lowering the PSA cutpoint to 2 ng/ml resulted in a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 20%, and an LR+ of 1.19. CONCLUSIONS: PSA testing had fair discriminating power for detecting prostate cancer in community practice. The PSA cutpoint of 4 ng/ml was sensitive but relatively non-specific and associated likelihood ratios only moderately revised probabilities for cancer. Using age-specific reference ranges and a PSA cutpoint below 4 ng/ml improved test specificity and sensitivity, respectively, but did not improve the overall accuracy of PSA testing. BioMed Central 2002-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC137591/ /pubmed/12398793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-19 Text en Copyright © 2002 Hoffman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hoffman, Richard M
Gilliland, Frank D
Adams-Cameron, Meg
Hunt, William C
Key, Charles R
Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice
title Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice
title_full Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice
title_fullStr Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice
title_full_unstemmed Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice
title_short Prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice
title_sort prostate-specific antigen testing accuracy in community practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12398793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-19
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmanrichardm prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice
AT gillilandfrankd prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice
AT adamscameronmeg prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice
AT huntwilliamc prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice
AT keycharlesr prostatespecificantigentestingaccuracyincommunitypractice