Cargando…
The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?
BACKGROUND: If intervention A bests B in one randomized trial, and B bests C in another randomized trial, can one conclude that A is better than C? The problem was motivated by the planning of a randomized trial, where A is spiral-CT screening, B is x-ray screening, and C is no screening. On its sur...
Autores principales: | Baker, Stuart G, Kramer, Barnett S |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12429069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-2-13 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?
por: Baker, Stuart G, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
The fallacy of enrolling only high-risk subjects in cancer prevention trials: Is there a "free lunch"?
por: Baker, Stuart G, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Dismissing the fallacies of childhood eczema management: case scenarios and an overview of best practices
por: Hon, Kam Lun, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The best of B.B. King
por: King, B. B.
Publicado: (1983) -
The best of B. B. King
por: King, B. B.
Publicado: (1980)