Cargando…

The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length

BACKGROUND: In general, the length of a protein sequence is determined by its function and the wide variance in the lengths of an organism's proteins reflects the diversity of specific functional roles for these proteins. However, additional evolutionary forces that affect the length of a prote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lipman, David J, Souvorov, Alexander, Koonin, Eugene V, Panchenko, Anna R, Tatusova, Tatiana A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12410938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-2-20
_version_ 1782120457460252672
author Lipman, David J
Souvorov, Alexander
Koonin, Eugene V
Panchenko, Anna R
Tatusova, Tatiana A
author_facet Lipman, David J
Souvorov, Alexander
Koonin, Eugene V
Panchenko, Anna R
Tatusova, Tatiana A
author_sort Lipman, David J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In general, the length of a protein sequence is determined by its function and the wide variance in the lengths of an organism's proteins reflects the diversity of specific functional roles for these proteins. However, additional evolutionary forces that affect the length of a protein may be revealed by studying the length distributions of proteins evolving under weaker functional constraints. RESULTS: We performed sequence comparisons to distinguish highly conserved and poorly conserved proteins from the bacterium Escherichia coli, the archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus, and the eukaryotes Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and Homo sapiens. For all organisms studied, the conserved and nonconserved proteins have strikingly different length distributions. The conserved proteins are, on average, longer than the poorly conserved ones, and the length distributions for the poorly conserved proteins have a relatively narrow peak, in contrast to the conserved proteins whose lengths spread over a wider range of values. For the two prokaryotes studied, the poorly conserved proteins approximate the minimal length distribution expected for a diverse range of structural folds. CONCLUSIONS: There is a relationship between protein conservation and sequence length. For all the organisms studied, there seems to be a significant evolutionary trend favoring shorter proteins in the absence of other, more specific functional constraints.
format Text
id pubmed-137605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1376052002-12-08 The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length Lipman, David J Souvorov, Alexander Koonin, Eugene V Panchenko, Anna R Tatusova, Tatiana A BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: In general, the length of a protein sequence is determined by its function and the wide variance in the lengths of an organism's proteins reflects the diversity of specific functional roles for these proteins. However, additional evolutionary forces that affect the length of a protein may be revealed by studying the length distributions of proteins evolving under weaker functional constraints. RESULTS: We performed sequence comparisons to distinguish highly conserved and poorly conserved proteins from the bacterium Escherichia coli, the archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus, and the eukaryotes Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and Homo sapiens. For all organisms studied, the conserved and nonconserved proteins have strikingly different length distributions. The conserved proteins are, on average, longer than the poorly conserved ones, and the length distributions for the poorly conserved proteins have a relatively narrow peak, in contrast to the conserved proteins whose lengths spread over a wider range of values. For the two prokaryotes studied, the poorly conserved proteins approximate the minimal length distribution expected for a diverse range of structural folds. CONCLUSIONS: There is a relationship between protein conservation and sequence length. For all the organisms studied, there seems to be a significant evolutionary trend favoring shorter proteins in the absence of other, more specific functional constraints. BioMed Central 2002-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC137605/ /pubmed/12410938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-2-20 Text en Copyright © 2002 Lipman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lipman, David J
Souvorov, Alexander
Koonin, Eugene V
Panchenko, Anna R
Tatusova, Tatiana A
The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length
title The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length
title_full The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length
title_fullStr The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length
title_full_unstemmed The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length
title_short The relationship of protein conservation and sequence length
title_sort relationship of protein conservation and sequence length
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12410938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-2-20
work_keys_str_mv AT lipmandavidj therelationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength
AT souvorovalexander therelationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength
AT koonineugenev therelationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength
AT panchenkoannar therelationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength
AT tatusovatatianaa therelationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength
AT lipmandavidj relationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength
AT souvorovalexander relationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength
AT koonineugenev relationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength
AT panchenkoannar relationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength
AT tatusovatatianaa relationshipofproteinconservationandsequencelength