Cargando…

Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees

BACKGROUND: In occupational life, a mismatch between high expenditure of effort and receiving few rewards may promote the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors, however, there is insufficient evidence to support or refute this hypothesis. The aim of this study is to examine the extent to which the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kouvonen, Anne, Kivimäki, Mika, Virtanen, Marianna, Heponiemi, Tarja, Elovainio, Marko, Pentti, Jaana, Linna, Anne, Vahtera, Jussi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1379636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16464262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-24
_version_ 1782126824699985920
author Kouvonen, Anne
Kivimäki, Mika
Virtanen, Marianna
Heponiemi, Tarja
Elovainio, Marko
Pentti, Jaana
Linna, Anne
Vahtera, Jussi
author_facet Kouvonen, Anne
Kivimäki, Mika
Virtanen, Marianna
Heponiemi, Tarja
Elovainio, Marko
Pentti, Jaana
Linna, Anne
Vahtera, Jussi
author_sort Kouvonen, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In occupational life, a mismatch between high expenditure of effort and receiving few rewards may promote the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors, however, there is insufficient evidence to support or refute this hypothesis. The aim of this study is to examine the extent to which the dimensions of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) model – effort, rewards and ERI – are associated with the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors. METHODS: Based on data from the Finnish Public Sector Study, cross-sectional analyses were performed for 28,894 women and 7233 men. ERI was conceptualized as a ratio of effort and rewards. To control for individual differences in response styles, such as a personal disposition to answer negatively to questionnaires, occupational and organizational -level ecological ERI scores were constructed in addition to individual-level ERI scores. Risk factors included current smoking, heavy drinking, body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2), and physical inactivity. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate the likelihood of having one risk factor, two risk factors, and three or four risk factors. The associations between ERI and single risk factors were explored using binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, socioeconomic position, marital status, and type of job contract, women and men with high ecological ERI were 40% more likely to have simultaneously ≥3 lifestyle risk factors (vs. 0 risk factors) compared with their counterparts with low ERI. When examined separately, both low ecological effort and low ecological rewards were also associated with an elevated prevalence of risk factor co-occurrence. The results obtained with the individual-level scores were in the same direction. The associations of ecological ERI with single risk factors were generally less marked than the associations with the co-occurrence of risk factors. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a high ratio of occupational efforts relative to rewards may be associated with an elevated risk of having multiple lifestyle risk factors. However, an unexpected association between low effort and a higher likelihood of risk factor co-occurrence as well as the absence of data on overcommitment (and thereby a lack of full test of the ERI model) warrant caution in regard to the extent to which the entire ERI model is supported by our evidence.
format Text
id pubmed-1379636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-13796362006-02-23 Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees Kouvonen, Anne Kivimäki, Mika Virtanen, Marianna Heponiemi, Tarja Elovainio, Marko Pentti, Jaana Linna, Anne Vahtera, Jussi BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In occupational life, a mismatch between high expenditure of effort and receiving few rewards may promote the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors, however, there is insufficient evidence to support or refute this hypothesis. The aim of this study is to examine the extent to which the dimensions of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) model – effort, rewards and ERI – are associated with the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors. METHODS: Based on data from the Finnish Public Sector Study, cross-sectional analyses were performed for 28,894 women and 7233 men. ERI was conceptualized as a ratio of effort and rewards. To control for individual differences in response styles, such as a personal disposition to answer negatively to questionnaires, occupational and organizational -level ecological ERI scores were constructed in addition to individual-level ERI scores. Risk factors included current smoking, heavy drinking, body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2), and physical inactivity. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate the likelihood of having one risk factor, two risk factors, and three or four risk factors. The associations between ERI and single risk factors were explored using binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, socioeconomic position, marital status, and type of job contract, women and men with high ecological ERI were 40% more likely to have simultaneously ≥3 lifestyle risk factors (vs. 0 risk factors) compared with their counterparts with low ERI. When examined separately, both low ecological effort and low ecological rewards were also associated with an elevated prevalence of risk factor co-occurrence. The results obtained with the individual-level scores were in the same direction. The associations of ecological ERI with single risk factors were generally less marked than the associations with the co-occurrence of risk factors. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a high ratio of occupational efforts relative to rewards may be associated with an elevated risk of having multiple lifestyle risk factors. However, an unexpected association between low effort and a higher likelihood of risk factor co-occurrence as well as the absence of data on overcommitment (and thereby a lack of full test of the ERI model) warrant caution in regard to the extent to which the entire ERI model is supported by our evidence. BioMed Central 2006-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1379636/ /pubmed/16464262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-24 Text en Copyright © 2006 Kouvonen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kouvonen, Anne
Kivimäki, Mika
Virtanen, Marianna
Heponiemi, Tarja
Elovainio, Marko
Pentti, Jaana
Linna, Anne
Vahtera, Jussi
Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees
title Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees
title_full Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees
title_fullStr Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees
title_full_unstemmed Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees
title_short Effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees
title_sort effort-reward imbalance at work and the co-occurrence of lifestyle risk factors: cross-sectional survey in a sample of 36,127 public sector employees
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1379636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16464262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-24
work_keys_str_mv AT kouvonenanne effortrewardimbalanceatworkandthecooccurrenceoflifestyleriskfactorscrosssectionalsurveyinasampleof36127publicsectoremployees
AT kivimakimika effortrewardimbalanceatworkandthecooccurrenceoflifestyleriskfactorscrosssectionalsurveyinasampleof36127publicsectoremployees
AT virtanenmarianna effortrewardimbalanceatworkandthecooccurrenceoflifestyleriskfactorscrosssectionalsurveyinasampleof36127publicsectoremployees
AT heponiemitarja effortrewardimbalanceatworkandthecooccurrenceoflifestyleriskfactorscrosssectionalsurveyinasampleof36127publicsectoremployees
AT elovainiomarko effortrewardimbalanceatworkandthecooccurrenceoflifestyleriskfactorscrosssectionalsurveyinasampleof36127publicsectoremployees
AT penttijaana effortrewardimbalanceatworkandthecooccurrenceoflifestyleriskfactorscrosssectionalsurveyinasampleof36127publicsectoremployees
AT linnaanne effortrewardimbalanceatworkandthecooccurrenceoflifestyleriskfactorscrosssectionalsurveyinasampleof36127publicsectoremployees
AT vahterajussi effortrewardimbalanceatworkandthecooccurrenceoflifestyleriskfactorscrosssectionalsurveyinasampleof36127publicsectoremployees