Cargando…
Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer patients; however, neoadjuvant modalities are currently being tested. Neoadjuvant studies in several tumor types have underscored the prognostic significance of pathological response for survival;...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1386679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16457727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7800-3-3 |
_version_ | 1782126874617446400 |
---|---|
author | Candelaria, Myrna Chanona-Vilchis, José Cetina, Lucely Flores-Estrada, Diana López-Graniel, Carlos González-Enciso, Aaron Cantú, David Poitevin, Adela Rivera, Lesbia Hinojosa, Jose de la Garza, Jaime Dueñas-Gonzalez, Alfonso |
author_facet | Candelaria, Myrna Chanona-Vilchis, José Cetina, Lucely Flores-Estrada, Diana López-Graniel, Carlos González-Enciso, Aaron Cantú, David Poitevin, Adela Rivera, Lesbia Hinojosa, Jose de la Garza, Jaime Dueñas-Gonzalez, Alfonso |
author_sort | Candelaria, Myrna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer patients; however, neoadjuvant modalities are currently being tested. Neoadjuvant studies in several tumor types have underscored the prognostic significance of pathological response for survival; however there is a paucity of studies in cervical cancer investigating this issue. METHODS: Four cohorts of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IB2-IIIB); included prospectively in phase II protocols of either neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 1) cisplatin-gemcitabine, 2) oxaliplatin-gemcitabine, 3) carboplatin-paclitaxel or 4) chemoradiation with cisplatin or cisplatin-gemcitabine followed by radical hysterectomy were analyzed for pathological response and survival. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty three (86%) of the 178 patients treated within these trials, underwent radical hysterectomy and were analyzed. Overall, the mean age was 44.7 and almost two-thirds were FIGO stage IIB. Pathological response rates were as follows: Complete (pCR) in 60 cases (39.2%), Near-complete (p-Near-CR) in 24 (15.6 %) and partial (pPR) in 69 cases (45.1%). A higher proportion rate of pCR was observed in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (with cisplatin [19/40, 47.5%]; or with cisplatin-gemcitabine [24/41, 58.5%] compared with patients receiving only chemotherapy, 6/23 (26%), 3/8 (37.5%) and 8/41 (19.5%) for cisplatin-gemcitabine, oxaliplatin-gemcitabine and carboplatin-paclitaxel respectively [p = 0.0001]). A total of 29 relapses (18.9%) were documented. The pathological response was the only factor influencing on relapse, since only 4/60 (6.6%) patients with pCR relapsed, compared with 25/93 (26.8%) patients with viable tumor, either pNear-CR or pPR (p = 0.001). Overall survival was 98.3% in patients with pCR versus 83% for patients with either pNear-CR or pPR (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Complete pathological response but no Near-complete and partial responses is associated with longer survival in cervical cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1386679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-13866792006-03-02 Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma Candelaria, Myrna Chanona-Vilchis, José Cetina, Lucely Flores-Estrada, Diana López-Graniel, Carlos González-Enciso, Aaron Cantú, David Poitevin, Adela Rivera, Lesbia Hinojosa, Jose de la Garza, Jaime Dueñas-Gonzalez, Alfonso Int Semin Surg Oncol Case Report BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer patients; however, neoadjuvant modalities are currently being tested. Neoadjuvant studies in several tumor types have underscored the prognostic significance of pathological response for survival; however there is a paucity of studies in cervical cancer investigating this issue. METHODS: Four cohorts of patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IB2-IIIB); included prospectively in phase II protocols of either neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 1) cisplatin-gemcitabine, 2) oxaliplatin-gemcitabine, 3) carboplatin-paclitaxel or 4) chemoradiation with cisplatin or cisplatin-gemcitabine followed by radical hysterectomy were analyzed for pathological response and survival. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty three (86%) of the 178 patients treated within these trials, underwent radical hysterectomy and were analyzed. Overall, the mean age was 44.7 and almost two-thirds were FIGO stage IIB. Pathological response rates were as follows: Complete (pCR) in 60 cases (39.2%), Near-complete (p-Near-CR) in 24 (15.6 %) and partial (pPR) in 69 cases (45.1%). A higher proportion rate of pCR was observed in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (with cisplatin [19/40, 47.5%]; or with cisplatin-gemcitabine [24/41, 58.5%] compared with patients receiving only chemotherapy, 6/23 (26%), 3/8 (37.5%) and 8/41 (19.5%) for cisplatin-gemcitabine, oxaliplatin-gemcitabine and carboplatin-paclitaxel respectively [p = 0.0001]). A total of 29 relapses (18.9%) were documented. The pathological response was the only factor influencing on relapse, since only 4/60 (6.6%) patients with pCR relapsed, compared with 25/93 (26.8%) patients with viable tumor, either pNear-CR or pPR (p = 0.001). Overall survival was 98.3% in patients with pCR versus 83% for patients with either pNear-CR or pPR (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Complete pathological response but no Near-complete and partial responses is associated with longer survival in cervical cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. BioMed Central 2006-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1386679/ /pubmed/16457727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7800-3-3 Text en Copyright © 2006 Candelaria et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Candelaria, Myrna Chanona-Vilchis, José Cetina, Lucely Flores-Estrada, Diana López-Graniel, Carlos González-Enciso, Aaron Cantú, David Poitevin, Adela Rivera, Lesbia Hinojosa, Jose de la Garza, Jaime Dueñas-Gonzalez, Alfonso Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma |
title | Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma |
title_full | Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma |
title_short | Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma |
title_sort | prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1386679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16457727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7800-3-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT candelariamyrna prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT chanonavilchisjose prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT cetinalucely prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT floresestradadiana prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT lopezgranielcarlos prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT gonzalezencisoaaron prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT cantudavid prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT poitevinadela prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT riveralesbia prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT hinojosajose prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT delagarzajaime prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma AT duenasgonzalezalfonso prognosticsignificanceofpathologicalresponseafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyorchemoradiationforlocallyadvancedcervicalcarcinoma |