Cargando…
Structures of ω repressors bound to direct and inverted DNA repeats explain modulation of transcription
Repressor ω regulates transcription of genes required for copy number control, accurate segregation and stable maintenance of inc18 plasmids hosted by Gram-positive bacteria. ω belongs to homodimeric ribbon-helix-helix (RHH(2)) repressors typified by a central, antiparallel β-sheet for DNA major gro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1401508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16528102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl015 |
_version_ | 1782126994013552640 |
---|---|
author | Weihofen, Wilhelm Andreas Cicek, Aslan Pratto, Florencia Alonso, Juan Carlos Saenger, Wolfram |
author_facet | Weihofen, Wilhelm Andreas Cicek, Aslan Pratto, Florencia Alonso, Juan Carlos Saenger, Wolfram |
author_sort | Weihofen, Wilhelm Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Repressor ω regulates transcription of genes required for copy number control, accurate segregation and stable maintenance of inc18 plasmids hosted by Gram-positive bacteria. ω belongs to homodimeric ribbon-helix-helix (RHH(2)) repressors typified by a central, antiparallel β-sheet for DNA major groove binding. Homodimeric ω(2) binds cooperatively to promotors with 7 to 10 consecutive non-palindromic DNA heptad repeats (5′-(A)/(T)ATCAC(A)/(T)-3′, symbolized by →) in palindromic inverted, converging (→←) or diverging (←→) orientation and also, unique to ω(2) and contrasting other RHH(2) repressors, to non-palindromic direct (→→) repeats. Here we investigate with crystal structures how ω(2) binds specifically to heptads in minimal operators with (→→) and (→←) repeats. Since the pseudo-2-fold axis relating the monomers in ω(2) passes the central C–G base pair of each heptad with ∼0.3 Å downstream offset, the separation between the pseudo-2-fold axes is exactly 7 bp in (→→), ∼0.6 Å shorter in (→←) but would be ∼0.6 Å longer in (←→). These variations grade interactions between adjacent ω(2) and explain modulations in cooperative binding affinity of ω(2) to operators with different heptad orientations. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1401508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14015082006-03-16 Structures of ω repressors bound to direct and inverted DNA repeats explain modulation of transcription Weihofen, Wilhelm Andreas Cicek, Aslan Pratto, Florencia Alonso, Juan Carlos Saenger, Wolfram Nucleic Acids Res Article Repressor ω regulates transcription of genes required for copy number control, accurate segregation and stable maintenance of inc18 plasmids hosted by Gram-positive bacteria. ω belongs to homodimeric ribbon-helix-helix (RHH(2)) repressors typified by a central, antiparallel β-sheet for DNA major groove binding. Homodimeric ω(2) binds cooperatively to promotors with 7 to 10 consecutive non-palindromic DNA heptad repeats (5′-(A)/(T)ATCAC(A)/(T)-3′, symbolized by →) in palindromic inverted, converging (→←) or diverging (←→) orientation and also, unique to ω(2) and contrasting other RHH(2) repressors, to non-palindromic direct (→→) repeats. Here we investigate with crystal structures how ω(2) binds specifically to heptads in minimal operators with (→→) and (→←) repeats. Since the pseudo-2-fold axis relating the monomers in ω(2) passes the central C–G base pair of each heptad with ∼0.3 Å downstream offset, the separation between the pseudo-2-fold axes is exactly 7 bp in (→→), ∼0.6 Å shorter in (→←) but would be ∼0.6 Å longer in (←→). These variations grade interactions between adjacent ω(2) and explain modulations in cooperative binding affinity of ω(2) to operators with different heptad orientations. Oxford University Press 2006 2006-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1401508/ /pubmed/16528102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl015 Text en © The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved |
spellingShingle | Article Weihofen, Wilhelm Andreas Cicek, Aslan Pratto, Florencia Alonso, Juan Carlos Saenger, Wolfram Structures of ω repressors bound to direct and inverted DNA repeats explain modulation of transcription |
title | Structures of ω repressors bound to direct and inverted DNA repeats explain modulation of transcription |
title_full | Structures of ω repressors bound to direct and inverted DNA repeats explain modulation of transcription |
title_fullStr | Structures of ω repressors bound to direct and inverted DNA repeats explain modulation of transcription |
title_full_unstemmed | Structures of ω repressors bound to direct and inverted DNA repeats explain modulation of transcription |
title_short | Structures of ω repressors bound to direct and inverted DNA repeats explain modulation of transcription |
title_sort | structures of ω repressors bound to direct and inverted dna repeats explain modulation of transcription |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1401508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16528102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weihofenwilhelmandreas structuresofōrepressorsboundtodirectandinverteddnarepeatsexplainmodulationoftranscription AT cicekaslan structuresofōrepressorsboundtodirectandinverteddnarepeatsexplainmodulationoftranscription AT prattoflorencia structuresofōrepressorsboundtodirectandinverteddnarepeatsexplainmodulationoftranscription AT alonsojuancarlos structuresofōrepressorsboundtodirectandinverteddnarepeatsexplainmodulationoftranscription AT saengerwolfram structuresofōrepressorsboundtodirectandinverteddnarepeatsexplainmodulationoftranscription |