Cargando…

Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening

BACKGROUND: Children with congenital hearing impairment benefit from early detection and management of their hearing loss. These and related considerations led to the recommendation of universal newborn hearing screening. In 2001 the first phase of a national Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grill, Eva, Uus, Kai, Hessel, Franz, Davies, Linda, Taylor, Rod S, Wasem, Juergen, Bamford, John
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1402282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16504089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-14
_version_ 1782127009149747200
author Grill, Eva
Uus, Kai
Hessel, Franz
Davies, Linda
Taylor, Rod S
Wasem, Juergen
Bamford, John
author_facet Grill, Eva
Uus, Kai
Hessel, Franz
Davies, Linda
Taylor, Rod S
Wasem, Juergen
Bamford, John
author_sort Grill, Eva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children with congenital hearing impairment benefit from early detection and management of their hearing loss. These and related considerations led to the recommendation of universal newborn hearing screening. In 2001 the first phase of a national Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHSP) was implemented in England. Objective of this study was to assess costs and effectiveness for hospital and community-based newborn hearing screening systems in England based on data from this first phase with regard to the effects of alterations to parameter values. METHODS: Design: Clinical effectiveness analysis using a Markov Model. Outcome measure: quality weighted detected child months (QCM). RESULTS: Both hospital and community programmes yielded 794 QCM at the age of 6 months with total costs of £3,690,000 per 100,000 screened children in hospital and £3,340,000 in community. Simulated costs would be lower in hospital in 48% of the trials. Any statistically significant difference between hospital and community in prevalence, test sensitivity, test specificity and costs would result in significant differences in cost-effectiveness between hospital and community. CONCLUSION: This modelling exercise informs decision makers by a quantitative projection of available data and the explicit and transparent statements about assumptions and the degree of uncertainty. Further evaluation of the cost-effectiveness should focus on the potential differences in test parameters and prevalence in these two settings.
format Text
id pubmed-1402282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14022822006-03-16 Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening Grill, Eva Uus, Kai Hessel, Franz Davies, Linda Taylor, Rod S Wasem, Juergen Bamford, John BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Children with congenital hearing impairment benefit from early detection and management of their hearing loss. These and related considerations led to the recommendation of universal newborn hearing screening. In 2001 the first phase of a national Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHSP) was implemented in England. Objective of this study was to assess costs and effectiveness for hospital and community-based newborn hearing screening systems in England based on data from this first phase with regard to the effects of alterations to parameter values. METHODS: Design: Clinical effectiveness analysis using a Markov Model. Outcome measure: quality weighted detected child months (QCM). RESULTS: Both hospital and community programmes yielded 794 QCM at the age of 6 months with total costs of £3,690,000 per 100,000 screened children in hospital and £3,340,000 in community. Simulated costs would be lower in hospital in 48% of the trials. Any statistically significant difference between hospital and community in prevalence, test sensitivity, test specificity and costs would result in significant differences in cost-effectiveness between hospital and community. CONCLUSION: This modelling exercise informs decision makers by a quantitative projection of available data and the explicit and transparent statements about assumptions and the degree of uncertainty. Further evaluation of the cost-effectiveness should focus on the potential differences in test parameters and prevalence in these two settings. BioMed Central 2006-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC1402282/ /pubmed/16504089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-14 Text en Copyright © 2006 Grill et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grill, Eva
Uus, Kai
Hessel, Franz
Davies, Linda
Taylor, Rod S
Wasem, Juergen
Bamford, John
Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening
title Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening
title_full Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening
title_fullStr Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening
title_short Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening
title_sort neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1402282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16504089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-14
work_keys_str_mv AT grilleva neonatalhearingscreeningmodellingcostandeffectivenessofhospitalandcommunitybasedscreening
AT uuskai neonatalhearingscreeningmodellingcostandeffectivenessofhospitalandcommunitybasedscreening
AT hesselfranz neonatalhearingscreeningmodellingcostandeffectivenessofhospitalandcommunitybasedscreening
AT davieslinda neonatalhearingscreeningmodellingcostandeffectivenessofhospitalandcommunitybasedscreening
AT taylorrods neonatalhearingscreeningmodellingcostandeffectivenessofhospitalandcommunitybasedscreening
AT wasemjuergen neonatalhearingscreeningmodellingcostandeffectivenessofhospitalandcommunitybasedscreening
AT bamfordjohn neonatalhearingscreeningmodellingcostandeffectivenessofhospitalandcommunitybasedscreening