Cargando…

Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q

INTRODUCTION: Chromosome arm 16q is the second most frequent target of loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer and is, therefore, a candidate to contain one or more classic tumour suppressor genes (TSGs). E-cadherin at 16q22 was identified as a TSG in lobular breast cancer, but TSGs in ductal breast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Wezel, Tom, Lombaerts, Marcel, van Roon, Eddy H, Philippo, Katja, Baelde, Hans J, Szuhai, Karoly, Cornelisse, Cees J, Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1410740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16280054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1337
_version_ 1782127062697377792
author van Wezel, Tom
Lombaerts, Marcel
van Roon, Eddy H
Philippo, Katja
Baelde, Hans J
Szuhai, Karoly
Cornelisse, Cees J
Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie
author_facet van Wezel, Tom
Lombaerts, Marcel
van Roon, Eddy H
Philippo, Katja
Baelde, Hans J
Szuhai, Karoly
Cornelisse, Cees J
Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie
author_sort van Wezel, Tom
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chromosome arm 16q is the second most frequent target of loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer and is, therefore, a candidate to contain one or more classic tumour suppressor genes (TSGs). E-cadherin at 16q22 was identified as a TSG in lobular breast cancer, but TSGs in ductal breast cancer remain elusive. Several genes have been suggested as potential candidates (e.g. CBFA2T3, CTCF and WWOX) but no inactivating mutations could be identified in these genes and they thus fail to fit the classic two-hit model for a TSG. With the completion of the human transcriptome, new candidate genes can be distinguished. Besides mutational inactivation, a TSG could, at least in a subset of the tumours, be transcriptionally suppressed or even inactivated. Studying candidate genes for expression and somatic mutations could thus identify the TSGs. METHODS: Possible candidates CBFA2T3, TERF2 and TERF2IP, FBXL8 and LRRC29 and FANCA were studied for insertion and deletion mutations and for expression differences using quantitative RT-PCR in a panel of tumour cell lines and primary tumours with and without loss of 16q. RESULTS: None of the genes showed mutations or obvious expression differences. FANCA expression increased with tumour grade. CONCLUSION: Apparently, the underlying genetics at chromosome 16q are complex or the TSGs remain to be identified. Multiple mechanisms, such as mutations, promoter hypermethylation or haploinsufficiency, might lead to the inactivation of a TSG.
format Text
id pubmed-1410740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14107402006-03-24 Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q van Wezel, Tom Lombaerts, Marcel van Roon, Eddy H Philippo, Katja Baelde, Hans J Szuhai, Karoly Cornelisse, Cees J Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Chromosome arm 16q is the second most frequent target of loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer and is, therefore, a candidate to contain one or more classic tumour suppressor genes (TSGs). E-cadherin at 16q22 was identified as a TSG in lobular breast cancer, but TSGs in ductal breast cancer remain elusive. Several genes have been suggested as potential candidates (e.g. CBFA2T3, CTCF and WWOX) but no inactivating mutations could be identified in these genes and they thus fail to fit the classic two-hit model for a TSG. With the completion of the human transcriptome, new candidate genes can be distinguished. Besides mutational inactivation, a TSG could, at least in a subset of the tumours, be transcriptionally suppressed or even inactivated. Studying candidate genes for expression and somatic mutations could thus identify the TSGs. METHODS: Possible candidates CBFA2T3, TERF2 and TERF2IP, FBXL8 and LRRC29 and FANCA were studied for insertion and deletion mutations and for expression differences using quantitative RT-PCR in a panel of tumour cell lines and primary tumours with and without loss of 16q. RESULTS: None of the genes showed mutations or obvious expression differences. FANCA expression increased with tumour grade. CONCLUSION: Apparently, the underlying genetics at chromosome 16q are complex or the TSGs remain to be identified. Multiple mechanisms, such as mutations, promoter hypermethylation or haploinsufficiency, might lead to the inactivation of a TSG. BioMed Central 2005 2005-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1410740/ /pubmed/16280054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1337 Text en Copyright © 2005 van Wezel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Wezel, Tom
Lombaerts, Marcel
van Roon, Eddy H
Philippo, Katja
Baelde, Hans J
Szuhai, Karoly
Cornelisse, Cees J
Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie
Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q
title Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q
title_full Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q
title_fullStr Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q
title_full_unstemmed Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q
title_short Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q
title_sort expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1410740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16280054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1337
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwezeltom expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q
AT lombaertsmarcel expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q
AT vanrooneddyh expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q
AT philippokatja expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q
AT baeldehansj expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q
AT szuhaikaroly expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q
AT cornelisseceesj expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q
AT cletonjansenannemarie expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q