Cargando…
Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q
INTRODUCTION: Chromosome arm 16q is the second most frequent target of loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer and is, therefore, a candidate to contain one or more classic tumour suppressor genes (TSGs). E-cadherin at 16q22 was identified as a TSG in lobular breast cancer, but TSGs in ductal breast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1410740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16280054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1337 |
_version_ | 1782127062697377792 |
---|---|
author | van Wezel, Tom Lombaerts, Marcel van Roon, Eddy H Philippo, Katja Baelde, Hans J Szuhai, Karoly Cornelisse, Cees J Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie |
author_facet | van Wezel, Tom Lombaerts, Marcel van Roon, Eddy H Philippo, Katja Baelde, Hans J Szuhai, Karoly Cornelisse, Cees J Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie |
author_sort | van Wezel, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chromosome arm 16q is the second most frequent target of loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer and is, therefore, a candidate to contain one or more classic tumour suppressor genes (TSGs). E-cadherin at 16q22 was identified as a TSG in lobular breast cancer, but TSGs in ductal breast cancer remain elusive. Several genes have been suggested as potential candidates (e.g. CBFA2T3, CTCF and WWOX) but no inactivating mutations could be identified in these genes and they thus fail to fit the classic two-hit model for a TSG. With the completion of the human transcriptome, new candidate genes can be distinguished. Besides mutational inactivation, a TSG could, at least in a subset of the tumours, be transcriptionally suppressed or even inactivated. Studying candidate genes for expression and somatic mutations could thus identify the TSGs. METHODS: Possible candidates CBFA2T3, TERF2 and TERF2IP, FBXL8 and LRRC29 and FANCA were studied for insertion and deletion mutations and for expression differences using quantitative RT-PCR in a panel of tumour cell lines and primary tumours with and without loss of 16q. RESULTS: None of the genes showed mutations or obvious expression differences. FANCA expression increased with tumour grade. CONCLUSION: Apparently, the underlying genetics at chromosome 16q are complex or the TSGs remain to be identified. Multiple mechanisms, such as mutations, promoter hypermethylation or haploinsufficiency, might lead to the inactivation of a TSG. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1410740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14107402006-03-24 Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q van Wezel, Tom Lombaerts, Marcel van Roon, Eddy H Philippo, Katja Baelde, Hans J Szuhai, Karoly Cornelisse, Cees J Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Chromosome arm 16q is the second most frequent target of loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer and is, therefore, a candidate to contain one or more classic tumour suppressor genes (TSGs). E-cadherin at 16q22 was identified as a TSG in lobular breast cancer, but TSGs in ductal breast cancer remain elusive. Several genes have been suggested as potential candidates (e.g. CBFA2T3, CTCF and WWOX) but no inactivating mutations could be identified in these genes and they thus fail to fit the classic two-hit model for a TSG. With the completion of the human transcriptome, new candidate genes can be distinguished. Besides mutational inactivation, a TSG could, at least in a subset of the tumours, be transcriptionally suppressed or even inactivated. Studying candidate genes for expression and somatic mutations could thus identify the TSGs. METHODS: Possible candidates CBFA2T3, TERF2 and TERF2IP, FBXL8 and LRRC29 and FANCA were studied for insertion and deletion mutations and for expression differences using quantitative RT-PCR in a panel of tumour cell lines and primary tumours with and without loss of 16q. RESULTS: None of the genes showed mutations or obvious expression differences. FANCA expression increased with tumour grade. CONCLUSION: Apparently, the underlying genetics at chromosome 16q are complex or the TSGs remain to be identified. Multiple mechanisms, such as mutations, promoter hypermethylation or haploinsufficiency, might lead to the inactivation of a TSG. BioMed Central 2005 2005-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1410740/ /pubmed/16280054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1337 Text en Copyright © 2005 van Wezel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Wezel, Tom Lombaerts, Marcel van Roon, Eddy H Philippo, Katja Baelde, Hans J Szuhai, Karoly Cornelisse, Cees J Cleton-Jansen, Anne-Marie Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q |
title | Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q |
title_full | Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q |
title_fullStr | Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q |
title_full_unstemmed | Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q |
title_short | Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q |
title_sort | expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1410740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16280054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanwezeltom expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q AT lombaertsmarcel expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q AT vanrooneddyh expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q AT philippokatja expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q AT baeldehansj expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q AT szuhaikaroly expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q AT cornelisseceesj expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q AT cletonjansenannemarie expressionanalysisofcandidatebreasttumoursuppressorgenesonchromosome16q |