Cargando…
Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)
BACKGROUND: Laboratory animals are commonly used for evaluating the physiological properties of the mammalian ovarian follicle and the enclosed oocyte. The use of different species to determine the morphological relationship between the follicle and oocyte has led to a recognizable pattern of follic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1413548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16509981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2 |
_version_ | 1782127083450793984 |
---|---|
author | Griffin, Jeanine Emery, Benjamin R Huang, Ivan Peterson, C Matthew Carrell, Douglas T |
author_facet | Griffin, Jeanine Emery, Benjamin R Huang, Ivan Peterson, C Matthew Carrell, Douglas T |
author_sort | Griffin, Jeanine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laboratory animals are commonly used for evaluating the physiological properties of the mammalian ovarian follicle and the enclosed oocyte. The use of different species to determine the morphological relationship between the follicle and oocyte has led to a recognizable pattern of follicular stages, but differences in follicle size, oocyte diameter and granulosa cell proliferation are not consistent across the different species. In an effort to better understand how these differences are expressed across multiple species, this investigation evaluates oocyte and follicle diameters and granulosa cell proliferation in the mouse, hamster, pig, and human. METHODS: Histological sections of ovaries from the mouse, hamster, pig, and human were used to calculate the diameter of the oocyte and follicle and the number of granulosa cells present at pre-determined stages of follicular development. A statistical analysis of these data was performed to determine the relationship of follicular growth and development within and between the species tested. RESULTS: These data have revealed that the relationships of the features listed are tightly regulated within each species, but they vary between the species studied. CONCLUSION: This information may be useful for comparative studies conducted in different animal models and the human. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1413548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14135482006-03-25 Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) Griffin, Jeanine Emery, Benjamin R Huang, Ivan Peterson, C Matthew Carrell, Douglas T J Exp Clin Assist Reprod Research BACKGROUND: Laboratory animals are commonly used for evaluating the physiological properties of the mammalian ovarian follicle and the enclosed oocyte. The use of different species to determine the morphological relationship between the follicle and oocyte has led to a recognizable pattern of follicular stages, but differences in follicle size, oocyte diameter and granulosa cell proliferation are not consistent across the different species. In an effort to better understand how these differences are expressed across multiple species, this investigation evaluates oocyte and follicle diameters and granulosa cell proliferation in the mouse, hamster, pig, and human. METHODS: Histological sections of ovaries from the mouse, hamster, pig, and human were used to calculate the diameter of the oocyte and follicle and the number of granulosa cells present at pre-determined stages of follicular development. A statistical analysis of these data was performed to determine the relationship of follicular growth and development within and between the species tested. RESULTS: These data have revealed that the relationships of the features listed are tightly regulated within each species, but they vary between the species studied. CONCLUSION: This information may be useful for comparative studies conducted in different animal models and the human. BioMed Central 2006-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1413548/ /pubmed/16509981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2 Text en Copyright © 2006 Griffin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Griffin, Jeanine Emery, Benjamin R Huang, Ivan Peterson, C Matthew Carrell, Douglas T Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) |
title | Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) |
title_full | Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) |
title_short | Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) |
title_sort | comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1413548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16509981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT griffinjeanine comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman AT emerybenjaminr comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman AT huangivan comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman AT petersoncmatthew comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman AT carrelldouglast comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman |