Cargando…

Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)

BACKGROUND: Laboratory animals are commonly used for evaluating the physiological properties of the mammalian ovarian follicle and the enclosed oocyte. The use of different species to determine the morphological relationship between the follicle and oocyte has led to a recognizable pattern of follic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffin, Jeanine, Emery, Benjamin R, Huang, Ivan, Peterson, C Matthew, Carrell, Douglas T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1413548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16509981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2
_version_ 1782127083450793984
author Griffin, Jeanine
Emery, Benjamin R
Huang, Ivan
Peterson, C Matthew
Carrell, Douglas T
author_facet Griffin, Jeanine
Emery, Benjamin R
Huang, Ivan
Peterson, C Matthew
Carrell, Douglas T
author_sort Griffin, Jeanine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laboratory animals are commonly used for evaluating the physiological properties of the mammalian ovarian follicle and the enclosed oocyte. The use of different species to determine the morphological relationship between the follicle and oocyte has led to a recognizable pattern of follicular stages, but differences in follicle size, oocyte diameter and granulosa cell proliferation are not consistent across the different species. In an effort to better understand how these differences are expressed across multiple species, this investigation evaluates oocyte and follicle diameters and granulosa cell proliferation in the mouse, hamster, pig, and human. METHODS: Histological sections of ovaries from the mouse, hamster, pig, and human were used to calculate the diameter of the oocyte and follicle and the number of granulosa cells present at pre-determined stages of follicular development. A statistical analysis of these data was performed to determine the relationship of follicular growth and development within and between the species tested. RESULTS: These data have revealed that the relationships of the features listed are tightly regulated within each species, but they vary between the species studied. CONCLUSION: This information may be useful for comparative studies conducted in different animal models and the human.
format Text
id pubmed-1413548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14135482006-03-25 Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) Griffin, Jeanine Emery, Benjamin R Huang, Ivan Peterson, C Matthew Carrell, Douglas T J Exp Clin Assist Reprod Research BACKGROUND: Laboratory animals are commonly used for evaluating the physiological properties of the mammalian ovarian follicle and the enclosed oocyte. The use of different species to determine the morphological relationship between the follicle and oocyte has led to a recognizable pattern of follicular stages, but differences in follicle size, oocyte diameter and granulosa cell proliferation are not consistent across the different species. In an effort to better understand how these differences are expressed across multiple species, this investigation evaluates oocyte and follicle diameters and granulosa cell proliferation in the mouse, hamster, pig, and human. METHODS: Histological sections of ovaries from the mouse, hamster, pig, and human were used to calculate the diameter of the oocyte and follicle and the number of granulosa cells present at pre-determined stages of follicular development. A statistical analysis of these data was performed to determine the relationship of follicular growth and development within and between the species tested. RESULTS: These data have revealed that the relationships of the features listed are tightly regulated within each species, but they vary between the species studied. CONCLUSION: This information may be useful for comparative studies conducted in different animal models and the human. BioMed Central 2006-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1413548/ /pubmed/16509981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2 Text en Copyright © 2006 Griffin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Griffin, Jeanine
Emery, Benjamin R
Huang, Ivan
Peterson, C Matthew
Carrell, Douglas T
Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)
title Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)
title_full Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)
title_short Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)
title_sort comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1413548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16509981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2
work_keys_str_mv AT griffinjeanine comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman
AT emerybenjaminr comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman
AT huangivan comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman
AT petersoncmatthew comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman
AT carrelldouglast comparativeanalysisoffolliclemorphologyandoocytediameterinfourmammalianspeciesmousehamsterpigandhuman