Cargando…

Clinical review: Renal tubular acidosis – a physicochemical approach

The Canadian physiologist PA Stewart advanced the theory that the proton concentration, and hence pH, in any compartment is dependent on the charges of fully ionized and partly ionized species, and on the prevailing CO(2 )tension, all of which he dubbed independent variables. Because the kidneys reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ring, Troels, Frische, Sebastian, Nielsen, Søren
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3802
_version_ 1782127103514247168
author Ring, Troels
Frische, Sebastian
Nielsen, Søren
author_facet Ring, Troels
Frische, Sebastian
Nielsen, Søren
author_sort Ring, Troels
collection PubMed
description The Canadian physiologist PA Stewart advanced the theory that the proton concentration, and hence pH, in any compartment is dependent on the charges of fully ionized and partly ionized species, and on the prevailing CO(2 )tension, all of which he dubbed independent variables. Because the kidneys regulate the concentrations of the most important fully ionized species ([K(+)], [Na(+)], and [Cl(-)]) but neither CO(2 )nor weak acids, the implication is that it should be possible to ascertain the renal contribution to acid–base homeostasis based on the excretion of these ions. One further corollary of Stewart's theory is that, because pH is solely dependent on the named independent variables, transport of protons to and from a compartment by itself will not influence pH. This is apparently in great contrast to models of proton pumps and bicarbonate transporters currently being examined in great molecular detail. Failure of these pumps and cotransporters is at the root of disorders called renal tubular acidoses. The unquestionable relation between malfunction of proton transporters and renal tubular acidosis represents a problem for Stewart theory. This review shows that the dilemma for Stewart theory is only apparent because transport of acid–base equivalents is accompanied by electrolytes. We suggest that Stewart theory may lead to new questions that must be investigated experimentally. Also, recent evidence from physiology that pH may not regulate acid–base transport is in accordance with the concepts presented by Stewart.
format Text
id pubmed-1414010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14140102006-03-28 Clinical review: Renal tubular acidosis – a physicochemical approach Ring, Troels Frische, Sebastian Nielsen, Søren Crit Care Review The Canadian physiologist PA Stewart advanced the theory that the proton concentration, and hence pH, in any compartment is dependent on the charges of fully ionized and partly ionized species, and on the prevailing CO(2 )tension, all of which he dubbed independent variables. Because the kidneys regulate the concentrations of the most important fully ionized species ([K(+)], [Na(+)], and [Cl(-)]) but neither CO(2 )nor weak acids, the implication is that it should be possible to ascertain the renal contribution to acid–base homeostasis based on the excretion of these ions. One further corollary of Stewart's theory is that, because pH is solely dependent on the named independent variables, transport of protons to and from a compartment by itself will not influence pH. This is apparently in great contrast to models of proton pumps and bicarbonate transporters currently being examined in great molecular detail. Failure of these pumps and cotransporters is at the root of disorders called renal tubular acidoses. The unquestionable relation between malfunction of proton transporters and renal tubular acidosis represents a problem for Stewart theory. This review shows that the dilemma for Stewart theory is only apparent because transport of acid–base equivalents is accompanied by electrolytes. We suggest that Stewart theory may lead to new questions that must be investigated experimentally. Also, recent evidence from physiology that pH may not regulate acid–base transport is in accordance with the concepts presented by Stewart. BioMed Central 2005 2005-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1414010/ /pubmed/16356241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3802 Text en Copyright © 2005 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Ring, Troels
Frische, Sebastian
Nielsen, Søren
Clinical review: Renal tubular acidosis – a physicochemical approach
title Clinical review: Renal tubular acidosis – a physicochemical approach
title_full Clinical review: Renal tubular acidosis – a physicochemical approach
title_fullStr Clinical review: Renal tubular acidosis – a physicochemical approach
title_full_unstemmed Clinical review: Renal tubular acidosis – a physicochemical approach
title_short Clinical review: Renal tubular acidosis – a physicochemical approach
title_sort clinical review: renal tubular acidosis – a physicochemical approach
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3802
work_keys_str_mv AT ringtroels clinicalreviewrenaltubularacidosisaphysicochemicalapproach
AT frischesebastian clinicalreviewrenaltubularacidosisaphysicochemicalapproach
AT nielsensøren clinicalreviewrenaltubularacidosisaphysicochemicalapproach