Cargando…

Functional hemodynamic monitoring

Hemodynamic monitoring is a central component of intensive care. Patterns of hemodynamic variables often suggest cardiogenic, hypovolemic, obstructive, or distributive (septic) etiologies to cardiovascular insufficiency, thus defining the specific treatments required. Monitoring increases in invasiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinsky, Michael R, Payen, Didier
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3927
_version_ 1782127107310092288
author Pinsky, Michael R
Payen, Didier
author_facet Pinsky, Michael R
Payen, Didier
author_sort Pinsky, Michael R
collection PubMed
description Hemodynamic monitoring is a central component of intensive care. Patterns of hemodynamic variables often suggest cardiogenic, hypovolemic, obstructive, or distributive (septic) etiologies to cardiovascular insufficiency, thus defining the specific treatments required. Monitoring increases in invasiveness, as required, as the risk for cardiovascular instability-induced morbidity increases because of the need to define more accurately the diagnosis and monitor the response to therapy. Monitoring is also context specific: requirements during cardiac surgery will be different from those in the intensive care unit or emergency department. Solitary hemodynamic values are useful as threshold monitors (e.g. hypotension is always pathological, central venous pressure is only elevated in disease). Some hemodynamic values can only be interpreted relative to metabolic demand, whereas others have multiple meanings. Functional hemodynamic monitoring implies a therapeutic application, independent of diagnosis such as a therapeutic trial of fluid challenge to assess preload responsiveness. Newer methods for assessing preload responsiveness include monitoring changes in central venous pressure during spontaneous inspiration, and variations in arterial pulse pressure, systolic pressure, and aortic flow variation in response to vena caval collapse during positive pressure ventilation or passive leg raising. Defining preload responsiveness using these functional measures, coupled to treatment protocols, can improve outcome from critical illness. Potentially, as these and newer, less invasive hemodynamic measures are validated, they could be incorporated into such protocolized care in a cost-effective manner.
format Text
id pubmed-1414021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14140212006-03-28 Functional hemodynamic monitoring Pinsky, Michael R Payen, Didier Crit Care Review Hemodynamic monitoring is a central component of intensive care. Patterns of hemodynamic variables often suggest cardiogenic, hypovolemic, obstructive, or distributive (septic) etiologies to cardiovascular insufficiency, thus defining the specific treatments required. Monitoring increases in invasiveness, as required, as the risk for cardiovascular instability-induced morbidity increases because of the need to define more accurately the diagnosis and monitor the response to therapy. Monitoring is also context specific: requirements during cardiac surgery will be different from those in the intensive care unit or emergency department. Solitary hemodynamic values are useful as threshold monitors (e.g. hypotension is always pathological, central venous pressure is only elevated in disease). Some hemodynamic values can only be interpreted relative to metabolic demand, whereas others have multiple meanings. Functional hemodynamic monitoring implies a therapeutic application, independent of diagnosis such as a therapeutic trial of fluid challenge to assess preload responsiveness. Newer methods for assessing preload responsiveness include monitoring changes in central venous pressure during spontaneous inspiration, and variations in arterial pulse pressure, systolic pressure, and aortic flow variation in response to vena caval collapse during positive pressure ventilation or passive leg raising. Defining preload responsiveness using these functional measures, coupled to treatment protocols, can improve outcome from critical illness. Potentially, as these and newer, less invasive hemodynamic measures are validated, they could be incorporated into such protocolized care in a cost-effective manner. BioMed Central 2005 2005-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1414021/ /pubmed/16356240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3927 Text en Copyright © 2005 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Pinsky, Michael R
Payen, Didier
Functional hemodynamic monitoring
title Functional hemodynamic monitoring
title_full Functional hemodynamic monitoring
title_fullStr Functional hemodynamic monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Functional hemodynamic monitoring
title_short Functional hemodynamic monitoring
title_sort functional hemodynamic monitoring
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3927
work_keys_str_mv AT pinskymichaelr functionalhemodynamicmonitoring
AT payendidier functionalhemodynamicmonitoring