Cargando…
Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters
INTRODUCTION: Central venous catheterization is commonly used in critically ill patients and may cause different complications, including infection. Although there are many studies about CVC-related infection, very few have analyzed it in detail. The objective of this study was to analyze the incide...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16280064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3824 |
_version_ | 1782127109770051584 |
---|---|
author | Lorente, Leonardo Henry, Christophe Martín, María M Jiménez, Alejandro Mora, María L |
author_facet | Lorente, Leonardo Henry, Christophe Martín, María M Jiménez, Alejandro Mora, María L |
author_sort | Lorente, Leonardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Central venous catheterization is commonly used in critically ill patients and may cause different complications, including infection. Although there are many studies about CVC-related infection, very few have analyzed it in detail. The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence of catheter-related local infection (CRLI) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) with central venous catheters (CVCs) according to different access sites. METHODS: This is a prospective and observational study, conducted in a 24-bed medical surgical intensive care unit of a 650-bed university hospital. All consecutive patients admitted to the ICU during 3 years (1 May 2000 and 30 April 2003) were included. RESULTS: The study included 2,018 patients. The number of CVCs and days of catheterization duration were: global, 2,595 and 18,999; subclavian, 917 and 8,239; jugular, 1,390 and 8,361; femoral, 288 and 2,399. CRLI incidence density was statistically higher for femoral than for jugular (15.83 versus 7.65, p < 0.001) and subclavian (15.83 versus 1.57, p < 0.001) accesses, and higher for jugular than for subclavian access (7.65 versus 1.57, p < 0.001). CRBSI incidence density was statistically higher for femoral than for jugular (8.34 versus 2.99, p = 0.002) and subclavian (8.34 versus 0.97, p < 0.001) accesses, and higher for jugular than for subclavian access (2.99 versus 0.97, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the order for punction, to minimize the CVC-related infection risk, should be subclavian (first order), jugular (second order) and femoral vein (third order). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1414031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14140312006-03-28 Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters Lorente, Leonardo Henry, Christophe Martín, María M Jiménez, Alejandro Mora, María L Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Central venous catheterization is commonly used in critically ill patients and may cause different complications, including infection. Although there are many studies about CVC-related infection, very few have analyzed it in detail. The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence of catheter-related local infection (CRLI) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) with central venous catheters (CVCs) according to different access sites. METHODS: This is a prospective and observational study, conducted in a 24-bed medical surgical intensive care unit of a 650-bed university hospital. All consecutive patients admitted to the ICU during 3 years (1 May 2000 and 30 April 2003) were included. RESULTS: The study included 2,018 patients. The number of CVCs and days of catheterization duration were: global, 2,595 and 18,999; subclavian, 917 and 8,239; jugular, 1,390 and 8,361; femoral, 288 and 2,399. CRLI incidence density was statistically higher for femoral than for jugular (15.83 versus 7.65, p < 0.001) and subclavian (15.83 versus 1.57, p < 0.001) accesses, and higher for jugular than for subclavian access (7.65 versus 1.57, p < 0.001). CRBSI incidence density was statistically higher for femoral than for jugular (8.34 versus 2.99, p = 0.002) and subclavian (8.34 versus 0.97, p < 0.001) accesses, and higher for jugular than for subclavian access (2.99 versus 0.97, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the order for punction, to minimize the CVC-related infection risk, should be subclavian (first order), jugular (second order) and femoral vein (third order). BioMed Central 2005 2005-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1414031/ /pubmed/16280064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3824 Text en Copyright © 2005 Lorente et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Research Lorente, Leonardo Henry, Christophe Martín, María M Jiménez, Alejandro Mora, María L Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters |
title | Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters |
title_full | Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters |
title_fullStr | Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters |
title_full_unstemmed | Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters |
title_short | Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters |
title_sort | central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16280064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3824 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorenteleonardo centralvenouscatheterrelatedinfectioninaprospectiveandobservationalstudyof2595catheters AT henrychristophe centralvenouscatheterrelatedinfectioninaprospectiveandobservationalstudyof2595catheters AT martinmariam centralvenouscatheterrelatedinfectioninaprospectiveandobservationalstudyof2595catheters AT jimenezalejandro centralvenouscatheterrelatedinfectioninaprospectiveandobservationalstudyof2595catheters AT moramarial centralvenouscatheterrelatedinfectioninaprospectiveandobservationalstudyof2595catheters |