Cargando…

Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?

Contemporary intensive care unit (ICU) medicine has complicated the issue of what constitutes death in a life support environment. Not only is the distinction between sapient life and prolongation of vital signs blurred but the concept of death itself has been made more complex. The demand for organ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whetstine, Leslie, Streat, Stephen, Darwin, Mike, Crippen, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3894
_version_ 1782127112292925440
author Whetstine, Leslie
Streat, Stephen
Darwin, Mike
Crippen, David
author_facet Whetstine, Leslie
Streat, Stephen
Darwin, Mike
Crippen, David
author_sort Whetstine, Leslie
collection PubMed
description Contemporary intensive care unit (ICU) medicine has complicated the issue of what constitutes death in a life support environment. Not only is the distinction between sapient life and prolongation of vital signs blurred but the concept of death itself has been made more complex. The demand for organs to facilitate transplantation promotes a strong incentive to define clinical death in a manner that most effectively supplies that demand. We consider the problem of defining death in the ICU as a function of viable organ availability for transplantation
format Text
id pubmed-1414041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14140412006-03-28 Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead? Whetstine, Leslie Streat, Stephen Darwin, Mike Crippen, David Crit Care Review Contemporary intensive care unit (ICU) medicine has complicated the issue of what constitutes death in a life support environment. Not only is the distinction between sapient life and prolongation of vital signs blurred but the concept of death itself has been made more complex. The demand for organs to facilitate transplantation promotes a strong incentive to define clinical death in a manner that most effectively supplies that demand. We consider the problem of defining death in the ICU as a function of viable organ availability for transplantation BioMed Central 2005 2005-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1414041/ /pubmed/16356234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3894 Text en Copyright © 2005 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Review
Whetstine, Leslie
Streat, Stephen
Darwin, Mike
Crippen, David
Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?
title Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?
title_full Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?
title_fullStr Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?
title_full_unstemmed Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?
title_short Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?
title_sort pro/con ethics debate: when is dead really dead?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3894
work_keys_str_mv AT whetstineleslie proconethicsdebatewhenisdeadreallydead
AT streatstephen proconethicsdebatewhenisdeadreallydead
AT darwinmike proconethicsdebatewhenisdeadreallydead
AT crippendavid proconethicsdebatewhenisdeadreallydead