Cargando…
Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?
Contemporary intensive care unit (ICU) medicine has complicated the issue of what constitutes death in a life support environment. Not only is the distinction between sapient life and prolongation of vital signs blurred but the concept of death itself has been made more complex. The demand for organ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3894 |
_version_ | 1782127112292925440 |
---|---|
author | Whetstine, Leslie Streat, Stephen Darwin, Mike Crippen, David |
author_facet | Whetstine, Leslie Streat, Stephen Darwin, Mike Crippen, David |
author_sort | Whetstine, Leslie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contemporary intensive care unit (ICU) medicine has complicated the issue of what constitutes death in a life support environment. Not only is the distinction between sapient life and prolongation of vital signs blurred but the concept of death itself has been made more complex. The demand for organs to facilitate transplantation promotes a strong incentive to define clinical death in a manner that most effectively supplies that demand. We consider the problem of defining death in the ICU as a function of viable organ availability for transplantation |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1414041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14140412006-03-28 Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead? Whetstine, Leslie Streat, Stephen Darwin, Mike Crippen, David Crit Care Review Contemporary intensive care unit (ICU) medicine has complicated the issue of what constitutes death in a life support environment. Not only is the distinction between sapient life and prolongation of vital signs blurred but the concept of death itself has been made more complex. The demand for organs to facilitate transplantation promotes a strong incentive to define clinical death in a manner that most effectively supplies that demand. We consider the problem of defining death in the ICU as a function of viable organ availability for transplantation BioMed Central 2005 2005-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1414041/ /pubmed/16356234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3894 Text en Copyright © 2005 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Review Whetstine, Leslie Streat, Stephen Darwin, Mike Crippen, David Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead? |
title | Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead? |
title_full | Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead? |
title_fullStr | Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead? |
title_short | Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead? |
title_sort | pro/con ethics debate: when is dead really dead? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3894 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whetstineleslie proconethicsdebatewhenisdeadreallydead AT streatstephen proconethicsdebatewhenisdeadreallydead AT darwinmike proconethicsdebatewhenisdeadreallydead AT crippendavid proconethicsdebatewhenisdeadreallydead |