Cargando…

Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]

BACKGROUND: Recently a clinical prediction rule (CPR) has been developed and validated that accurately identifies patients with low back pain (LBP) that are likely to benefit from a lumbo-pelvic thrust manipulation. The studies that developed and validated the rule used the identical manipulation pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cleland, Joshua A, Fritz, Julie M, Childs, John D, Kulig, Kornelia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16472379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-11
_version_ 1782127166708776960
author Cleland, Joshua A
Fritz, Julie M
Childs, John D
Kulig, Kornelia
author_facet Cleland, Joshua A
Fritz, Julie M
Childs, John D
Kulig, Kornelia
author_sort Cleland, Joshua A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently a clinical prediction rule (CPR) has been developed and validated that accurately identifies patients with low back pain (LBP) that are likely to benefit from a lumbo-pelvic thrust manipulation. The studies that developed and validated the rule used the identical manipulation procedure. However, recent evidence suggests that different manual therapy techniques may result similar outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of three different manual therapy techniques in a subgroup of patient with low back pain that satisfy the CPR. METHODS/DESIGN: Consecutive patients with LBP referred to physical therapy clinics in one of four geographical locations who satisfy the CPR will be invited to participate in this randomized clinical trial. Subjects who agree to participate will undergo a standard evaluation and complete a number of patient self-report questionnaires including the Oswestry Disability Index (OSW), which will serve as the primary outcome measure. Following the baseline examination patients will be randomly assigned to receive the lumbopelvic manipulation used in the development of the CPR, an alternative lumbar manipulation technique, or non-thrust lumbar mobilization technique for the first 2 visits. Beginning on visit 3, all 3 groups will receive an identical standard exercise program for 3 visits (visits 3,4,5). Outcomes of interest will be captured by a therapist blind to group assignment at 1 week (3(rd )visit), 4 weeks (6(th )visit) and at a 6-month follow-up. The primary aim of the study will be tested with analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the change in OSW score from baseline to 4-weeks (OSW(Baseline )– OSW(4-weeks)) as the dependent variable. The independent variable will be treatment with three levels (lumbo-pelvic manipulation, alternative lumbar manipulation, lumbar mobilization). DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first to investigate the effectiveness of various manual therapy techniques for patients with LBP who satisfy a CPR.
format Text
id pubmed-1421401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14214012006-04-01 Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998] Cleland, Joshua A Fritz, Julie M Childs, John D Kulig, Kornelia BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Recently a clinical prediction rule (CPR) has been developed and validated that accurately identifies patients with low back pain (LBP) that are likely to benefit from a lumbo-pelvic thrust manipulation. The studies that developed and validated the rule used the identical manipulation procedure. However, recent evidence suggests that different manual therapy techniques may result similar outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of three different manual therapy techniques in a subgroup of patient with low back pain that satisfy the CPR. METHODS/DESIGN: Consecutive patients with LBP referred to physical therapy clinics in one of four geographical locations who satisfy the CPR will be invited to participate in this randomized clinical trial. Subjects who agree to participate will undergo a standard evaluation and complete a number of patient self-report questionnaires including the Oswestry Disability Index (OSW), which will serve as the primary outcome measure. Following the baseline examination patients will be randomly assigned to receive the lumbopelvic manipulation used in the development of the CPR, an alternative lumbar manipulation technique, or non-thrust lumbar mobilization technique for the first 2 visits. Beginning on visit 3, all 3 groups will receive an identical standard exercise program for 3 visits (visits 3,4,5). Outcomes of interest will be captured by a therapist blind to group assignment at 1 week (3(rd )visit), 4 weeks (6(th )visit) and at a 6-month follow-up. The primary aim of the study will be tested with analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the change in OSW score from baseline to 4-weeks (OSW(Baseline )– OSW(4-weeks)) as the dependent variable. The independent variable will be treatment with three levels (lumbo-pelvic manipulation, alternative lumbar manipulation, lumbar mobilization). DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first to investigate the effectiveness of various manual therapy techniques for patients with LBP who satisfy a CPR. BioMed Central 2006-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1421401/ /pubmed/16472379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-11 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cleland et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cleland, Joshua A
Fritz, Julie M
Childs, John D
Kulig, Kornelia
Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]
title Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]
title_full Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]
title_fullStr Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]
title_short Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998]
title_sort comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [nct00257998]
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16472379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-11
work_keys_str_mv AT clelandjoshuaa comparisonoftheeffectivenessofthreemanualphysicaltherapytechniquesinasubgroupofpatientswithlowbackpainwhosatisfyaclinicalpredictionrulestudyprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrialnct00257998
AT fritzjuliem comparisonoftheeffectivenessofthreemanualphysicaltherapytechniquesinasubgroupofpatientswithlowbackpainwhosatisfyaclinicalpredictionrulestudyprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrialnct00257998
AT childsjohnd comparisonoftheeffectivenessofthreemanualphysicaltherapytechniquesinasubgroupofpatientswithlowbackpainwhosatisfyaclinicalpredictionrulestudyprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrialnct00257998
AT kuligkornelia comparisonoftheeffectivenessofthreemanualphysicaltherapytechniquesinasubgroupofpatientswithlowbackpainwhosatisfyaclinicalpredictionrulestudyprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrialnct00257998