Cargando…
Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims
BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians underestimate the prevalence of domestic violence and community violence. Victims are therefore at risk of further episodes of violence, with psychological and physical consequences. We used an interview to assess the prevalence of domestic and community violence...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16526962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-15 |
_version_ | 1782127168022642688 |
---|---|
author | Morier-Genoud, Claire Bodenmann, Patrick Favrat, Bernard Vannotti, Marco |
author_facet | Morier-Genoud, Claire Bodenmann, Patrick Favrat, Bernard Vannotti, Marco |
author_sort | Morier-Genoud, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians underestimate the prevalence of domestic violence and community violence. Victims are therefore at risk of further episodes of violence, with psychological and physical consequences. We used an interview to assess the prevalence of domestic and community violence among Swiss natives and foreigners. In a follow-up study, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for the positive patients. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of violence by use of a questionnaire in an interview, in an academic general internal medicine clinic in Switzerland. In a follow-up, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for positive patients. The participants were 38 residents and 446 consecutive patients. Questionnaires were presented in the principal language spoken by our patients. They addressed sociodemographics, present and past violence, the security or lack of security felt by victims of violence, and the patients' own violence. Between 3 and 6 months after the first interview, we did a follow-up of all patients who had reported domestic violence in the last year. RESULTS: Of the 366 patients included in the study, 36 (9.8%) reported being victims of physical violence during the last year (physicians identified only 4 patients out of the 36), and 34/366 (9.3%) reported being victims of psychological violence. Domestic violence was responsible for 67.3% of the cases, and community violence for 21.8%. In 10.9% of the cases, both forms of violence were found. Of 29 patients who reported being victims of domestic violence, 22 were found in the follow-up. The frequency of violence had diminished (4/22) or the violence had ceased (17/22). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of violence is high; domestic violence is more frequent than community violence. There was no statistically significant difference between the Swiss and foreign patients' responses related to the rates of violence. Patients in a currently violent relationship stated that participating in the study helped them and that the violence decreased or ceased a few months later. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1421406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14214062006-04-01 Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims Morier-Genoud, Claire Bodenmann, Patrick Favrat, Bernard Vannotti, Marco BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians underestimate the prevalence of domestic violence and community violence. Victims are therefore at risk of further episodes of violence, with psychological and physical consequences. We used an interview to assess the prevalence of domestic and community violence among Swiss natives and foreigners. In a follow-up study, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for the positive patients. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of violence by use of a questionnaire in an interview, in an academic general internal medicine clinic in Switzerland. In a follow-up, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for positive patients. The participants were 38 residents and 446 consecutive patients. Questionnaires were presented in the principal language spoken by our patients. They addressed sociodemographics, present and past violence, the security or lack of security felt by victims of violence, and the patients' own violence. Between 3 and 6 months after the first interview, we did a follow-up of all patients who had reported domestic violence in the last year. RESULTS: Of the 366 patients included in the study, 36 (9.8%) reported being victims of physical violence during the last year (physicians identified only 4 patients out of the 36), and 34/366 (9.3%) reported being victims of psychological violence. Domestic violence was responsible for 67.3% of the cases, and community violence for 21.8%. In 10.9% of the cases, both forms of violence were found. Of 29 patients who reported being victims of domestic violence, 22 were found in the follow-up. The frequency of violence had diminished (4/22) or the violence had ceased (17/22). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of violence is high; domestic violence is more frequent than community violence. There was no statistically significant difference between the Swiss and foreign patients' responses related to the rates of violence. Patients in a currently violent relationship stated that participating in the study helped them and that the violence decreased or ceased a few months later. BioMed Central 2006-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1421406/ /pubmed/16526962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-15 Text en Copyright © 2006 Morier-Genoud et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Morier-Genoud, Claire Bodenmann, Patrick Favrat, Bernard Vannotti, Marco Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims |
title | Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims |
title_full | Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims |
title_fullStr | Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims |
title_full_unstemmed | Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims |
title_short | Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims |
title_sort | violence in primary care: prevalence and follow-up of victims |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16526962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moriergenoudclaire violenceinprimarycareprevalenceandfollowupofvictims AT bodenmannpatrick violenceinprimarycareprevalenceandfollowupofvictims AT favratbernard violenceinprimarycareprevalenceandfollowupofvictims AT vannottimarco violenceinprimarycareprevalenceandfollowupofvictims |