Cargando…

Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians underestimate the prevalence of domestic violence and community violence. Victims are therefore at risk of further episodes of violence, with psychological and physical consequences. We used an interview to assess the prevalence of domestic and community violence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morier-Genoud, Claire, Bodenmann, Patrick, Favrat, Bernard, Vannotti, Marco
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16526962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-15
_version_ 1782127168022642688
author Morier-Genoud, Claire
Bodenmann, Patrick
Favrat, Bernard
Vannotti, Marco
author_facet Morier-Genoud, Claire
Bodenmann, Patrick
Favrat, Bernard
Vannotti, Marco
author_sort Morier-Genoud, Claire
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians underestimate the prevalence of domestic violence and community violence. Victims are therefore at risk of further episodes of violence, with psychological and physical consequences. We used an interview to assess the prevalence of domestic and community violence among Swiss natives and foreigners. In a follow-up study, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for the positive patients. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of violence by use of a questionnaire in an interview, in an academic general internal medicine clinic in Switzerland. In a follow-up, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for positive patients. The participants were 38 residents and 446 consecutive patients. Questionnaires were presented in the principal language spoken by our patients. They addressed sociodemographics, present and past violence, the security or lack of security felt by victims of violence, and the patients' own violence. Between 3 and 6 months after the first interview, we did a follow-up of all patients who had reported domestic violence in the last year. RESULTS: Of the 366 patients included in the study, 36 (9.8%) reported being victims of physical violence during the last year (physicians identified only 4 patients out of the 36), and 34/366 (9.3%) reported being victims of psychological violence. Domestic violence was responsible for 67.3% of the cases, and community violence for 21.8%. In 10.9% of the cases, both forms of violence were found. Of 29 patients who reported being victims of domestic violence, 22 were found in the follow-up. The frequency of violence had diminished (4/22) or the violence had ceased (17/22). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of violence is high; domestic violence is more frequent than community violence. There was no statistically significant difference between the Swiss and foreign patients' responses related to the rates of violence. Patients in a currently violent relationship stated that participating in the study helped them and that the violence decreased or ceased a few months later.
format Text
id pubmed-1421406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14214062006-04-01 Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims Morier-Genoud, Claire Bodenmann, Patrick Favrat, Bernard Vannotti, Marco BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians underestimate the prevalence of domestic violence and community violence. Victims are therefore at risk of further episodes of violence, with psychological and physical consequences. We used an interview to assess the prevalence of domestic and community violence among Swiss natives and foreigners. In a follow-up study, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for the positive patients. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of violence by use of a questionnaire in an interview, in an academic general internal medicine clinic in Switzerland. In a follow-up, we evaluated the consequences of the interview for positive patients. The participants were 38 residents and 446 consecutive patients. Questionnaires were presented in the principal language spoken by our patients. They addressed sociodemographics, present and past violence, the security or lack of security felt by victims of violence, and the patients' own violence. Between 3 and 6 months after the first interview, we did a follow-up of all patients who had reported domestic violence in the last year. RESULTS: Of the 366 patients included in the study, 36 (9.8%) reported being victims of physical violence during the last year (physicians identified only 4 patients out of the 36), and 34/366 (9.3%) reported being victims of psychological violence. Domestic violence was responsible for 67.3% of the cases, and community violence for 21.8%. In 10.9% of the cases, both forms of violence were found. Of 29 patients who reported being victims of domestic violence, 22 were found in the follow-up. The frequency of violence had diminished (4/22) or the violence had ceased (17/22). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of violence is high; domestic violence is more frequent than community violence. There was no statistically significant difference between the Swiss and foreign patients' responses related to the rates of violence. Patients in a currently violent relationship stated that participating in the study helped them and that the violence decreased or ceased a few months later. BioMed Central 2006-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1421406/ /pubmed/16526962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-15 Text en Copyright © 2006 Morier-Genoud et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morier-Genoud, Claire
Bodenmann, Patrick
Favrat, Bernard
Vannotti, Marco
Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims
title Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims
title_full Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims
title_fullStr Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims
title_full_unstemmed Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims
title_short Violence in primary care: Prevalence and follow-up of victims
title_sort violence in primary care: prevalence and follow-up of victims
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16526962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-15
work_keys_str_mv AT moriergenoudclaire violenceinprimarycareprevalenceandfollowupofvictims
AT bodenmannpatrick violenceinprimarycareprevalenceandfollowupofvictims
AT favratbernard violenceinprimarycareprevalenceandfollowupofvictims
AT vannottimarco violenceinprimarycareprevalenceandfollowupofvictims