Cargando…
Modest induction of phase 2 enzyme activity in the F-344 rat prostate
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men and is thought to arise as a result of endogenous oxidative stress in the face of compromised carcinogen defenses. We tested whether carcinogen defense (phase 2) enzymes could be induced in the prostate tissues of rats afte...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16539699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-62 |
_version_ | 1782127173828608000 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Sunita B Brooks, James D |
author_facet | Jones, Sunita B Brooks, James D |
author_sort | Jones, Sunita B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men and is thought to arise as a result of endogenous oxidative stress in the face of compromised carcinogen defenses. We tested whether carcinogen defense (phase 2) enzymes could be induced in the prostate tissues of rats after oral feeding of candidate phase 2 enzyme inducing compounds. METHODS: Male F344 rats were gavage fed sulforaphane, β-naphthoflavone, curcumin, dimethyl fumarate or vehicle control over five days, and on the sixth day, prostate, liver, kidney and bladder tissues were harvested. Cytosolic enzyme activities of nicotinamide quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), total glutathione transferase (using DCNB) and mu-class glutathione transferase (using CDNB) were determined in the treated and control animals and compared. RESULTS: In prostatic tissues, sulforaphane produced modest but significant increases in the enzymatic activities of NQO1, total GST and GST-mu compared to control animals. β-naphthoflavone significantly increased NQO1 and GST-mu activities and curcumin increased total GST and GST-mu enzymatic activities. Dimethyl fumarate did not significantly increase prostatic phase 2 enzyme activity. Compared to control animals, sulforaphane also significantly induced NQO1 or total GST enzyme activity in the liver, kidney and, most significantly, in the bladder tissues. All compounds were well tolerated over the course of the gavage feedings. CONCLUSION: Orally administered compounds will induce modestly phase 2 enzyme activity in the prostate although the significance of this degree of induction is unknown. The 4 different compounds also altered phase 2 enzyme activity to different degrees in different tissue types. Orally administered sulforaphane potently induces phase 2 enzymes in bladder tissues and should be investigated as a bladder cancer preventive agent. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1421427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14214272006-04-01 Modest induction of phase 2 enzyme activity in the F-344 rat prostate Jones, Sunita B Brooks, James D BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men and is thought to arise as a result of endogenous oxidative stress in the face of compromised carcinogen defenses. We tested whether carcinogen defense (phase 2) enzymes could be induced in the prostate tissues of rats after oral feeding of candidate phase 2 enzyme inducing compounds. METHODS: Male F344 rats were gavage fed sulforaphane, β-naphthoflavone, curcumin, dimethyl fumarate or vehicle control over five days, and on the sixth day, prostate, liver, kidney and bladder tissues were harvested. Cytosolic enzyme activities of nicotinamide quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), total glutathione transferase (using DCNB) and mu-class glutathione transferase (using CDNB) were determined in the treated and control animals and compared. RESULTS: In prostatic tissues, sulforaphane produced modest but significant increases in the enzymatic activities of NQO1, total GST and GST-mu compared to control animals. β-naphthoflavone significantly increased NQO1 and GST-mu activities and curcumin increased total GST and GST-mu enzymatic activities. Dimethyl fumarate did not significantly increase prostatic phase 2 enzyme activity. Compared to control animals, sulforaphane also significantly induced NQO1 or total GST enzyme activity in the liver, kidney and, most significantly, in the bladder tissues. All compounds were well tolerated over the course of the gavage feedings. CONCLUSION: Orally administered compounds will induce modestly phase 2 enzyme activity in the prostate although the significance of this degree of induction is unknown. The 4 different compounds also altered phase 2 enzyme activity to different degrees in different tissue types. Orally administered sulforaphane potently induces phase 2 enzymes in bladder tissues and should be investigated as a bladder cancer preventive agent. BioMed Central 2006-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1421427/ /pubmed/16539699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-62 Text en Copyright © 2006 Jones and Brooks; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jones, Sunita B Brooks, James D Modest induction of phase 2 enzyme activity in the F-344 rat prostate |
title | Modest induction of phase 2 enzyme activity in the F-344 rat prostate |
title_full | Modest induction of phase 2 enzyme activity in the F-344 rat prostate |
title_fullStr | Modest induction of phase 2 enzyme activity in the F-344 rat prostate |
title_full_unstemmed | Modest induction of phase 2 enzyme activity in the F-344 rat prostate |
title_short | Modest induction of phase 2 enzyme activity in the F-344 rat prostate |
title_sort | modest induction of phase 2 enzyme activity in the f-344 rat prostate |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16539699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-62 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonessunitab modestinductionofphase2enzymeactivityinthef344ratprostate AT brooksjamesd modestinductionofphase2enzymeactivityinthef344ratprostate |