Cargando…

A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003)

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the research productivity of different world regions in the field of Parasitology. METHODS: Using the PubMed database we retrieved articles from journals included in the "Parasitology" category of the "Journal Citation Reports&qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falagas, Matthew E, Papastamataki, Paraskevi A, Bliziotis, Ioannis A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1431540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16545114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-56
_version_ 1782127197830512640
author Falagas, Matthew E
Papastamataki, Paraskevi A
Bliziotis, Ioannis A
author_facet Falagas, Matthew E
Papastamataki, Paraskevi A
Bliziotis, Ioannis A
author_sort Falagas, Matthew E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the research productivity of different world regions in the field of Parasitology. METHODS: Using the PubMed database we retrieved articles from journals included in the "Parasitology" category of the "Journal Citation Reports" database of the Institute for Scientific Information for the period 1995–2003. Research productivity was evaluated based on a methodology we developed and used in other bibliometric studies by analysing: (1) the total number of publications, (2) the mean impact factor of all papers, and (3) the product of the above two parameters, (4) the research productivity in relation to gross domestic product of each region, and (5) the research productivity in relation to gross national income per capita and population of each region. RESULTS: Data on the country of origin of the research was available for 18,110 out of 18,377 articles (98.6% of all articles from the included journals). Western Europe exceeds all world regions in research production for the period studied (34.8% of total articles), with USA ranking second (19.9%), and Latin America & the Caribbean ranking third (17.2%). The mean impact factor in articles published in Parasitology journals was highest for the USA (1.88). Oceania ranked first in research productivity when adjustments for both the gross national income per capita (GNIPC) and population were made. Eastern Europe almost tripled the production of articles from only 1.9% of total production in 1995 to 4.3% in 2003. Similarly, Latin America and the Caribbean and Asia doubled their production. However, the absolute and relative production by some developing areas, including Africa, is still very low, despite the fact that parasitic diseases are major public health problems in these areas. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that more help should be provided by the developed nations to developing areas for improvement of the infrastructure of research.
format Text
id pubmed-1431540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14315402006-04-06 A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003) Falagas, Matthew E Papastamataki, Paraskevi A Bliziotis, Ioannis A BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the research productivity of different world regions in the field of Parasitology. METHODS: Using the PubMed database we retrieved articles from journals included in the "Parasitology" category of the "Journal Citation Reports" database of the Institute for Scientific Information for the period 1995–2003. Research productivity was evaluated based on a methodology we developed and used in other bibliometric studies by analysing: (1) the total number of publications, (2) the mean impact factor of all papers, and (3) the product of the above two parameters, (4) the research productivity in relation to gross domestic product of each region, and (5) the research productivity in relation to gross national income per capita and population of each region. RESULTS: Data on the country of origin of the research was available for 18,110 out of 18,377 articles (98.6% of all articles from the included journals). Western Europe exceeds all world regions in research production for the period studied (34.8% of total articles), with USA ranking second (19.9%), and Latin America & the Caribbean ranking third (17.2%). The mean impact factor in articles published in Parasitology journals was highest for the USA (1.88). Oceania ranked first in research productivity when adjustments for both the gross national income per capita (GNIPC) and population were made. Eastern Europe almost tripled the production of articles from only 1.9% of total production in 1995 to 4.3% in 2003. Similarly, Latin America and the Caribbean and Asia doubled their production. However, the absolute and relative production by some developing areas, including Africa, is still very low, despite the fact that parasitic diseases are major public health problems in these areas. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that more help should be provided by the developed nations to developing areas for improvement of the infrastructure of research. BioMed Central 2006-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1431540/ /pubmed/16545114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-56 Text en Copyright © 2006 Falagas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Falagas, Matthew E
Papastamataki, Paraskevi A
Bliziotis, Ioannis A
A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003)
title A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003)
title_full A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003)
title_fullStr A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003)
title_full_unstemmed A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003)
title_short A bibliometric analysis of research productivity in Parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003)
title_sort bibliometric analysis of research productivity in parasitology by different world regions during a 9-year period (1995–2003)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1431540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16545114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-56
work_keys_str_mv AT falagasmatthewe abibliometricanalysisofresearchproductivityinparasitologybydifferentworldregionsduringa9yearperiod19952003
AT papastamatakiparaskevia abibliometricanalysisofresearchproductivityinparasitologybydifferentworldregionsduringa9yearperiod19952003
AT bliziotisioannisa abibliometricanalysisofresearchproductivityinparasitologybydifferentworldregionsduringa9yearperiod19952003
AT falagasmatthewe bibliometricanalysisofresearchproductivityinparasitologybydifferentworldregionsduringa9yearperiod19952003
AT papastamatakiparaskevia bibliometricanalysisofresearchproductivityinparasitologybydifferentworldregionsduringa9yearperiod19952003
AT bliziotisioannisa bibliometricanalysisofresearchproductivityinparasitologybydifferentworldregionsduringa9yearperiod19952003